The Impact of Usage Method and Coffee Variety on Consumer Preferences of Coffee Creamers

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Dominic Rovai, Kumpol Homwongpanich, Megan Watson, MaryAnne Drake
{"title":"The Impact of Usage Method and Coffee Variety on Consumer Preferences of Coffee Creamers","authors":"Dominic Rovai,&nbsp;Kumpol Homwongpanich,&nbsp;Megan Watson,&nbsp;MaryAnne Drake","doi":"10.1111/joss.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumer evaluation of coffee creamers necessitates evaluation in a cup of coffee. Two phases of research were used to determine if method of serving creamer or coffee variety impacted the acceptance of four creamers. In Phase I, consumers evaluated creamers in medium roast coffee using one of three methods: (1) Fixed amount (<i>n</i> = 127), (2) free pour (<i>n</i> = 120), and (3) warm-up (<i>n</i> = 122). In Phase II, the serving method was constant (fixed amount), but consumers (<i>n</i> = 134) evaluated creamers in two coffees (light and dark roast). Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics. No significant interactions (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) were observed for overall liking (key metric) for either creamer × method (Phase I) or creamer × coffee (Phase II). Thus, the choice of serving method will not impact creamer preference. Further, the choice of coffee roast will not impact creamer preference, but creamers served in light roast coffee had higher liking scores than creamers served in dark roast coffee.</p>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer evaluation of coffee creamers necessitates evaluation in a cup of coffee. Two phases of research were used to determine if method of serving creamer or coffee variety impacted the acceptance of four creamers. In Phase I, consumers evaluated creamers in medium roast coffee using one of three methods: (1) Fixed amount (n = 127), (2) free pour (n = 120), and (3) warm-up (n = 122). In Phase II, the serving method was constant (fixed amount), but consumers (n = 134) evaluated creamers in two coffees (light and dark roast). Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics. No significant interactions (p > 0.05) were observed for overall liking (key metric) for either creamer × method (Phase I) or creamer × coffee (Phase II). Thus, the choice of serving method will not impact creamer preference. Further, the choice of coffee roast will not impact creamer preference, but creamers served in light roast coffee had higher liking scores than creamers served in dark roast coffee.

Abstract Image

使用方法和咖啡品种对咖啡奶精消费者偏好的影响
消费者对咖啡奶精的评价需要在一杯咖啡中进行评价。两个阶段的研究被用来确定提供奶精的方法或咖啡品种是否会影响四种奶精的接受度。在第一阶段,消费者使用三种方法中的一种来评估中烘焙咖啡中的奶油:(1)固定数量(n = 127),(2)自由倒入(n = 120),(3)预热(n = 122)。在第二阶段,上菜方法是固定的(固定的量),但消费者(n = 134)评估了两种咖啡(浅烘焙和深烘焙)中的奶精。数据分析采用单因素和多因素统计。在奶精×方法(第一阶段)或奶精×咖啡(第二阶段)的总体喜好(关键指标)方面,没有观察到显著的相互作用(p > 0.05)。因此,服务方法的选择不会影响奶精的偏好。此外,烘焙咖啡的选择不会影响奶精的偏好,但浅烘焙咖啡中的奶精比深烘焙咖啡中的奶精有更高的喜欢得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信