Mobile-based Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Urology Training: Implementation and Outcomes

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Fabian J. Aschwanden , Luca Afferi , Lukas Kandler , Adrian P. Marty , Philipp Baumeister , Agostino Mattei , Marko Kozomara , Christian D. Fankhauser
{"title":"Mobile-based Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities in Urology Training: Implementation and Outcomes","authors":"Fabian J. Aschwanden ,&nbsp;Luca Afferi ,&nbsp;Lukas Kandler ,&nbsp;Adrian P. Marty ,&nbsp;Philipp Baumeister ,&nbsp;Agostino Mattei ,&nbsp;Marko Kozomara ,&nbsp;Christian D. Fankhauser","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Urology residency programs often lack consistent feedback mechanisms and tracking of an individual’s progress. Competency-based medical education, using entrustable professional activities (EPAs), offers a solution but faces challenges in implementation. The aim of this study was to implement and assess a smartphone application for real-time EPA assessments in urology residency programs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mobile application was introduced to 13 urology residents and ten supervisors at a Swiss training institution. Assessment characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Agreement between trainees and supervisors on task complexity and supervision levels was evaluated using Cohen’s and Fleiss’ κ metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Over a period of 7 mo, 246 EPA assessments were recorded, of which 214 assessments were completed, representing a completion rate of 86%. Procedural EPAs accounted for 92% of the assessments, and nonprocedural EPAs for 8%. Cohen’s κ indicated moderate agreement for task complexity (κ = 0.56) and supervision levels (κ = 0.55). Higher agreement was observed when trainees were rated competent in supervising others (κ = 0.71). Limitations include the focus on procedural tasks and the small sample size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>A mobile application can effectively facilitate real-time EPA assessments in urology training, promoting frequent feedback conversations and efficient tracking of resident progress. However, greater emphasis on nonprocedural EPAs is needed.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We tested a mobile phone app that provides real-time feedback to urology residents and found that it enhanced their training experience. While the app effectively tracks progress in carrying out procedures, more focus is needed on developing nonprocedural skills such as patient counseling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Urology residency programs often lack consistent feedback mechanisms and tracking of an individual’s progress. Competency-based medical education, using entrustable professional activities (EPAs), offers a solution but faces challenges in implementation. The aim of this study was to implement and assess a smartphone application for real-time EPA assessments in urology residency programs.

Methods

A mobile application was introduced to 13 urology residents and ten supervisors at a Swiss training institution. Assessment characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Agreement between trainees and supervisors on task complexity and supervision levels was evaluated using Cohen’s and Fleiss’ κ metrics.

Key findings and limitations

Over a period of 7 mo, 246 EPA assessments were recorded, of which 214 assessments were completed, representing a completion rate of 86%. Procedural EPAs accounted for 92% of the assessments, and nonprocedural EPAs for 8%. Cohen’s κ indicated moderate agreement for task complexity (κ = 0.56) and supervision levels (κ = 0.55). Higher agreement was observed when trainees were rated competent in supervising others (κ = 0.71). Limitations include the focus on procedural tasks and the small sample size.

Conclusions and clinical implications

A mobile application can effectively facilitate real-time EPA assessments in urology training, promoting frequent feedback conversations and efficient tracking of resident progress. However, greater emphasis on nonprocedural EPAs is needed.

Patient summary

We tested a mobile phone app that provides real-time feedback to urology residents and found that it enhanced their training experience. While the app effectively tracks progress in carrying out procedures, more focus is needed on developing nonprocedural skills such as patient counseling.
泌尿外科培训中可信赖的专业活动的移动评估:实施和结果
背景和目的泌尿外科住院医师项目通常缺乏一致的反馈机制和对个人进展的跟踪。基于能力的医学教育,利用可委托的专业活动(EPAs),提供了一种解决方案,但在实施中面临挑战。本研究的目的是在泌尿外科住院医师项目中实施和评估用于实时EPA评估的智能手机应用程序。方法对瑞士某培训机构13名泌尿外科住院医师和10名主管进行手机应用。采用描述性统计分析评价特征。使用Cohen ' s和Fleiss ' s κ指标评估学员和主管对任务复杂性和监督水平的一致性。在7个月的时间里,记录了246项EPA评估,其中214项评估完成,完成率为86%。程序性环境影响评估占评估的92%,非程序性环境影响评估占8%。Cohen’s κ表示对任务复杂性(κ = 0.56)和监督水平(κ = 0.55)的中度一致。当受训者被评为有能力监督他人时,一致性较高(κ = 0.71)。局限性包括对程序性任务的关注和小样本量。结论及临床意义一款移动应用程序可以有效地促进泌尿外科培训中的实时EPA评估,促进频繁的反馈对话和有效的住院医师进度跟踪。但是,需要更加强调非程序性环境保护措施。我们测试了一个向泌尿外科住院医师提供实时反馈的手机应用程序,发现它提高了他们的培训体验。虽然该应用程序可以有效地跟踪手术的进展,但需要更多地关注患者咨询等非程序性技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信