Technique refinement for complex locoregional reconstruction after spine surgery: Optimization of closed suction drain use

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Nikhil Sobti , Carole S.L. Spake , Daniel Hu , Elijah Persad-Paisley , Vinay Rao , Victor King , Rahul Sastry , Adetokunbo Oyelese , Ziya Gokaslan , Daniel Kwan , Paul Y. Liu , Albert S. Woo
{"title":"Technique refinement for complex locoregional reconstruction after spine surgery: Optimization of closed suction drain use","authors":"Nikhil Sobti ,&nbsp;Carole S.L. Spake ,&nbsp;Daniel Hu ,&nbsp;Elijah Persad-Paisley ,&nbsp;Vinay Rao ,&nbsp;Victor King ,&nbsp;Rahul Sastry ,&nbsp;Adetokunbo Oyelese ,&nbsp;Ziya Gokaslan ,&nbsp;Daniel Kwan ,&nbsp;Paul Y. Liu ,&nbsp;Albert S. Woo","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Plastic surgeons have become increasingly involved in the locoregional closure of spinal wounds after instrumentation, which has proven to minimize postoperative complications, especially among high-risk patient populations. Therefore, optimization and standardization of surgical techniques, including drain placement, for complex spine closure remain paramount. This study aims to investigate drain usage after plastic surgery closure for spine wounds to identify risk factors for postoperative complications that may provide insight to further guide intraoperative decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted to identify 174 consecutive patients who underwent spinal instrumentation with plastic surgery-assisted locoregional flap closure performed at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2016 and July 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients who underwent locoregional complex closure of spinal wounds with a single drain (n = 89) demonstrated a lower incidence of infection (4.5% versus 16.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.01) and wound dehiscence (1.1% versus 9.4%, <em>p</em> = 0.02) when compared with the multidrain cohort (n = 85) via univariate and binomial regression analysis. The depth of infection (superficial versus deep) did not vary between groups. Seroma rates were comparable (13.5% versus 15.3%, <em>p</em> = 0.76). Longer time interval to drain removal (&gt;3 weeks) was found to increase the risk of infection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results suggest that the use of multiple drains after locoregional closure of spinal wounds may confer an increased risk of surgical site infection, without theorized protection from seroma formation. In addition, the duration of drain placement should be used to guide the timing of drain removal, instead of daily output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"103 ","pages":"Pages 148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525000889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Plastic surgeons have become increasingly involved in the locoregional closure of spinal wounds after instrumentation, which has proven to minimize postoperative complications, especially among high-risk patient populations. Therefore, optimization and standardization of surgical techniques, including drain placement, for complex spine closure remain paramount. This study aims to investigate drain usage after plastic surgery closure for spine wounds to identify risk factors for postoperative complications that may provide insight to further guide intraoperative decision making.

Methods

An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted to identify 174 consecutive patients who underwent spinal instrumentation with plastic surgery-assisted locoregional flap closure performed at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2016 and July 2021.

Results

Patients who underwent locoregional complex closure of spinal wounds with a single drain (n = 89) demonstrated a lower incidence of infection (4.5% versus 16.5%, p = 0.01) and wound dehiscence (1.1% versus 9.4%, p = 0.02) when compared with the multidrain cohort (n = 85) via univariate and binomial regression analysis. The depth of infection (superficial versus deep) did not vary between groups. Seroma rates were comparable (13.5% versus 15.3%, p = 0.76). Longer time interval to drain removal (>3 weeks) was found to increase the risk of infection.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the use of multiple drains after locoregional closure of spinal wounds may confer an increased risk of surgical site infection, without theorized protection from seroma formation. In addition, the duration of drain placement should be used to guide the timing of drain removal, instead of daily output.
导言整形外科医生越来越多地参与脊柱伤口器械术后的局部闭合,事实证明这可以最大限度地减少术后并发症,尤其是在高危患者群体中。因此,优化和标准化包括引流管放置在内的复杂脊柱闭合手术技术仍然至关重要。本研究旨在调查脊柱伤口整形手术闭合后引流管的使用情况,以确定术后并发症的风险因素,从而为进一步指导术中决策提供启示。研究方法在2016年1月至2021年7月期间,在一家三级学术医疗中心进行了一项经IRB批准的回顾性病历审查,确定了174名接受脊柱器械手术并在整形手术辅助下进行局部皮瓣闭合的连续患者。结果通过单变量和二项回归分析,与多引流管队列(n = 85)相比,使用单引流管进行脊柱伤口局部复合闭合的患者(n = 89)感染(4.5% 对 16.5%,p = 0.01)和伤口裂开(1.1% 对 9.4%,p = 0.02)发生率较低。各组的感染深度(表层与深层)没有差异。血清肿发生率相当(13.5% 对 15.3%,P = 0.76)。结论我们的研究结果表明,脊柱伤口局部闭合后使用多根引流管可能会增加手术部位感染的风险,但理论上并不会防止血清肿的形成。此外,应根据引流管放置的持续时间来确定移除引流管的时间,而不是每天的排出量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信