A dose–response meta-analysis of grape by-product effects on lamb growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
J. Bahrampour , A.H. Piray , A. Mousaie , M. H. Ghaffari
{"title":"A dose–response meta-analysis of grape by-product effects on lamb growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters","authors":"J. Bahrampour ,&nbsp;A.H. Piray ,&nbsp;A. Mousaie ,&nbsp;M. H. Ghaffari","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous studies on feeding grape by-products (<strong>GBP</strong>) to lambs have shown conflicting results regarding performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and blood constituents. To clarify these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and dose-dependent effects of GBP in lamb diets. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, including the localisation of knots, leave-one-out tests and the exclusion of data points with high GBP addition (more than 600 g/kg). The results showed that GBP addition had no statistically significant effect on DMI (<em>P</em> = 0.92), average daily gain (<em>P</em> = 0.21) or final live weight (<em>P</em> = 0.36). However, GBP inclusion had a significant effect on feed conversion ratio (<em>P</em> = 0.002), with lambs fed up to 450 g/kg GBP showing an improved feed conversion ratio, which peaked at 200 g/kg. ADF digestibility was not significantly affected by GBP inclusion (<em>P</em> = 0.08). Conversely, significant negative linear correlations were observed between the consumption of GBP and the digestibility of OM (<em>P</em> = 0.03), CP (<em>P</em> = 0.002), DM (<em>P</em> = 0.001) and NDF (<em>P</em> = 0.004). In contrast, the intake of GBP was positively associated with fat digestibility (<em>P</em> = 0.001). The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between GBP intake and urinary nitrogen excretion, nitrogen consumed, faecal nitrogen excretion, or nitrogen retained. Blood analysis also showed no significant correlation between GBP consumption and serum concentrations of albumin, cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, or total protein. However, blood urea nitrogen concentration showed a significant non-linear, J-shaped relationship with GBP consumption (<em>P</em> = 0.001), decreasing with GBP inclusion up to 250 g/kg DM, with no significant changes at higher levels. No statistically significant effects of GBP on serum AST (<em>P</em> = 0.28) or GGT (<em>P</em> = 0.93) were observed. In contrast, GBP intake of up to 200 g/kg DM significantly reduced ALT activity in serum (<em>P</em> = 0.009). In conclusion, the intake of GBP shows a dose-dependent response that affects nutrient digestibility and may influence feed efficiency and health status of lambs. Intake of GBP in the range of 200–400 g/kg DM can improve feed conversion ratio and health but can also reduce the digestibility of certain feed components such as OM, DM, CP and NDF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 101449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731125000321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies on feeding grape by-products (GBP) to lambs have shown conflicting results regarding performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, and blood constituents. To clarify these uncertainties, we conducted a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and dose-dependent effects of GBP in lamb diets. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, including the localisation of knots, leave-one-out tests and the exclusion of data points with high GBP addition (more than 600 g/kg). The results showed that GBP addition had no statistically significant effect on DMI (P = 0.92), average daily gain (P = 0.21) or final live weight (P = 0.36). However, GBP inclusion had a significant effect on feed conversion ratio (P = 0.002), with lambs fed up to 450 g/kg GBP showing an improved feed conversion ratio, which peaked at 200 g/kg. ADF digestibility was not significantly affected by GBP inclusion (P = 0.08). Conversely, significant negative linear correlations were observed between the consumption of GBP and the digestibility of OM (P = 0.03), CP (P = 0.002), DM (P = 0.001) and NDF (P = 0.004). In contrast, the intake of GBP was positively associated with fat digestibility (P = 0.001). The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between GBP intake and urinary nitrogen excretion, nitrogen consumed, faecal nitrogen excretion, or nitrogen retained. Blood analysis also showed no significant correlation between GBP consumption and serum concentrations of albumin, cholesterol, glucose, triglycerides, or total protein. However, blood urea nitrogen concentration showed a significant non-linear, J-shaped relationship with GBP consumption (P = 0.001), decreasing with GBP inclusion up to 250 g/kg DM, with no significant changes at higher levels. No statistically significant effects of GBP on serum AST (P = 0.28) or GGT (P = 0.93) were observed. In contrast, GBP intake of up to 200 g/kg DM significantly reduced ALT activity in serum (P = 0.009). In conclusion, the intake of GBP shows a dose-dependent response that affects nutrient digestibility and may influence feed efficiency and health status of lambs. Intake of GBP in the range of 200–400 g/kg DM can improve feed conversion ratio and health but can also reduce the digestibility of certain feed components such as OM, DM, CP and NDF.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信