Christopher A. Febres-Aldana, Morana Vojnic, Igor Odintsov, Tom Zhang, Ryan Cheng, Catherine Z. Beach, Daniel Lu, Marissa S. Mattar, Andrea M. Gazzo, Leo Gili, Manju Harshan, Ali Ameri, Stephen Machnicki, Xiuying Xiao, William W. Lockwood, Xiao-yan Zhou, Qianlan Yao, Alexander Drilon, Natasha Rekhtman, Nameeta Shah, Anqi Li, Zebing Liu, Soo-Ryum Yang, Monika A. Davare, Marc Ladanyi, Romel Somwar
{"title":"Pan-cancer analysis of oncogenic MET fusions reveals distinct pathogenomic subsets with differential sensitivity to MET-targeted therapy","authors":"Christopher A. Febres-Aldana, Morana Vojnic, Igor Odintsov, Tom Zhang, Ryan Cheng, Catherine Z. Beach, Daniel Lu, Marissa S. Mattar, Andrea M. Gazzo, Leo Gili, Manju Harshan, Ali Ameri, Stephen Machnicki, Xiuying Xiao, William W. Lockwood, Xiao-yan Zhou, Qianlan Yao, Alexander Drilon, Natasha Rekhtman, Nameeta Shah, Anqi Li, Zebing Liu, Soo-Ryum Yang, Monika A. Davare, Marc Ladanyi, Romel Somwar","doi":"10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MET fusions (MET-Fs) are oncogenic drivers that remain poorly characterized. Analysis of 56 MET-F-positive tumors from an institutional cohort of 91,119 patients (79,864 DNA-seq plus 11,255 RNA-seq) uncovered two forms of MET-F pathobiology. The first group featured 5’ partners with homodimerization domains fused in-frame with MET-tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), primarily originated from translocations, frequently excluded MET exon 14, mediated oncogenesis through cytoplasmic aggregation and constitutive activation, and were markedly sensitive to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in pre-clinical models and patients with lung cancer. The second group lacked partner homodimerization motifs and retained MET transmembrane and extracellular domains. Their pathogenesis involved intrachromosomal rearrangements, resulting in partner selection for promoter hijacking and fusion allele amplification. Membrane-bound fusions were enriched in gliomas with RTK co-alterations. We provide a framework to comprehend the heterogeneous landscape of MET-Fs, supporting that fusion oncogenicity and MET-TKI sensitivity are determined by structural topology and pathogenomic context.","PeriodicalId":9430,"journal":{"name":"Cancer discovery","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
MET fusions (MET-Fs) are oncogenic drivers that remain poorly characterized. Analysis of 56 MET-F-positive tumors from an institutional cohort of 91,119 patients (79,864 DNA-seq plus 11,255 RNA-seq) uncovered two forms of MET-F pathobiology. The first group featured 5’ partners with homodimerization domains fused in-frame with MET-tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), primarily originated from translocations, frequently excluded MET exon 14, mediated oncogenesis through cytoplasmic aggregation and constitutive activation, and were markedly sensitive to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in pre-clinical models and patients with lung cancer. The second group lacked partner homodimerization motifs and retained MET transmembrane and extracellular domains. Their pathogenesis involved intrachromosomal rearrangements, resulting in partner selection for promoter hijacking and fusion allele amplification. Membrane-bound fusions were enriched in gliomas with RTK co-alterations. We provide a framework to comprehend the heterogeneous landscape of MET-Fs, supporting that fusion oncogenicity and MET-TKI sensitivity are determined by structural topology and pathogenomic context.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Discovery publishes high-impact, peer-reviewed articles detailing significant advances in both research and clinical trials. Serving as a premier cancer information resource, the journal also features Review Articles, Perspectives, Commentaries, News stories, and Research Watch summaries to keep readers abreast of the latest findings in the field. Covering a wide range of topics, from laboratory research to clinical trials and epidemiologic studies, Cancer Discovery spans the entire spectrum of cancer research and medicine.