Multifactorial Assessment of Complication Risks in Embolization for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm.

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0095
Arata Nagai, Shinya Sonobe, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Eiryo Kawakami, Yasushi Matsumoto, Hirotoshi Imamura, Tetsu Satow, Koji Iihara, Chiaki Sakai, Nobuyuki Sakai, Shigeru Miyachi, Hidenori Endo, Teiji Tominaga
{"title":"Multifactorial Assessment of Complication Risks in Embolization for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm.","authors":"Arata Nagai, Shinya Sonobe, Kuniyasu Niizuma, Tetsuo Ishikawa, Eiryo Kawakami, Yasushi Matsumoto, Hirotoshi Imamura, Tetsu Satow, Koji Iihara, Chiaki Sakai, Nobuyuki Sakai, Shigeru Miyachi, Hidenori Endo, Teiji Tominaga","doi":"10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Complications in neuroendovascular therapy for cerebral aneurysm (AN) affect the clinical course of patients. Patient conditions, operating procedures, and operator expertise were highlighted as risk factors for complications. These risk factors often combine and constitute particularly strong risks, resulting in a worsened clinical course. In this study, we performed a multifactorial assessment of complication risks in neuroendovascular therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patient data from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3, which is a nationwide retrospective cohort study of neuroendovascular procedures conducted between 2010 and 2014. Patients who underwent coil embolization for a ruptured anterior communicating artery (Acom) AN, an internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) AN, or basilar artery bifurcation (BA-bif) AN were included in this analysis. Information on 16 explanatory variables and 1 objective variable for each patient was obtained from the dataset as nominal variables. The explanatory variables consisted of patient factors, procedural factors, and an operator factor. The objective variable was whether the following complications occurred: intraprocedural bleeding, postprocedural bleeding, and procedure-related infarction. The specific situations involving multiple risk factors associated with high complication rates were identified using a programmed method. The impact of the absence of a supervising physician was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2971 patients were analyzed. The complication rates for patients with Acom ANs, IC-PC ANs, and BA-bif ANs were 12.9%, 10.2%, and 13.7%, respectively. A total of 15 specific situations were identified as follows: 3 related to an Acom AN, with complication rates ranging from 19.3% to 20.3%; 4 related to an IC-PC AN, with complication rates ranging from 15.6% to 17.9%; and 8 related to a BA-bif AN, with complication rates ranging from 20.6% to 33.3%. In 4 of these situations, the absence of a supervising physician significantly impacted complication rates. For instance, the complication rate for patients with IC-PC AN treated under local anesthesia was 16.0% overall, but it was 23.8% without supervising physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multifactorial assessment based on patient, procedural, and operator factors provides more reliable risk estimations and will help improve the clinical course.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2024-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Complications in neuroendovascular therapy for cerebral aneurysm (AN) affect the clinical course of patients. Patient conditions, operating procedures, and operator expertise were highlighted as risk factors for complications. These risk factors often combine and constitute particularly strong risks, resulting in a worsened clinical course. In this study, we performed a multifactorial assessment of complication risks in neuroendovascular therapy.

Methods: We analyzed patient data from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3, which is a nationwide retrospective cohort study of neuroendovascular procedures conducted between 2010 and 2014. Patients who underwent coil embolization for a ruptured anterior communicating artery (Acom) AN, an internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery (IC-PC) AN, or basilar artery bifurcation (BA-bif) AN were included in this analysis. Information on 16 explanatory variables and 1 objective variable for each patient was obtained from the dataset as nominal variables. The explanatory variables consisted of patient factors, procedural factors, and an operator factor. The objective variable was whether the following complications occurred: intraprocedural bleeding, postprocedural bleeding, and procedure-related infarction. The specific situations involving multiple risk factors associated with high complication rates were identified using a programmed method. The impact of the absence of a supervising physician was also assessed.

Results: A total of 2971 patients were analyzed. The complication rates for patients with Acom ANs, IC-PC ANs, and BA-bif ANs were 12.9%, 10.2%, and 13.7%, respectively. A total of 15 specific situations were identified as follows: 3 related to an Acom AN, with complication rates ranging from 19.3% to 20.3%; 4 related to an IC-PC AN, with complication rates ranging from 15.6% to 17.9%; and 8 related to a BA-bif AN, with complication rates ranging from 20.6% to 33.3%. In 4 of these situations, the absence of a supervising physician significantly impacted complication rates. For instance, the complication rate for patients with IC-PC AN treated under local anesthesia was 16.0% overall, but it was 23.8% without supervising physicians.

Conclusion: Multifactorial assessment based on patient, procedural, and operator factors provides more reliable risk estimations and will help improve the clinical course.

脑动脉瘤破裂栓塞术并发症的多因素评价。
目的:探讨神经血管内治疗脑动脉瘤的并发症对患者临床病程的影响。患者情况、手术程序和操作人员专业知识被强调为并发症的危险因素。这些危险因素往往结合在一起,构成特别严重的危险,导致临床病程恶化。在这项研究中,我们对神经血管内治疗的并发症风险进行了多因素评估。方法:我们分析了来自日本神经血管内治疗登记处的患者数据,这是一项2010年至2014年间进行的全国性神经血管内手术回顾性队列研究。因前交通动脉(Acom) AN、颈内动脉-后交通动脉(IC-PC) AN或基底动脉分叉(BA-bif) AN破裂而接受线圈栓塞治疗的患者被纳入该分析。每个患者的16个解释变量和1个客观变量的信息作为名义变量从数据集中获得。解释变量包括患者因素、程序因素和操作人员因素。客观变量是是否发生以下并发症:术中出血、术后出血和手术相关梗死。使用程序化方法确定涉及与高并发症发生率相关的多种危险因素的具体情况。还评估了督导医生缺席的影响。结果:共分析2971例患者。Acom an、IC-PC an和ba - biif an的并发症发生率分别为12.9%、10.2%和13.7%。共确定15例具体情况如下:3例与acoman相关,并发症发生率为19.3% ~ 20.3%;4例与IC-PC an相关,并发症发生率为15.6% ~ 17.9%;8例与BA-bif AN相关,并发症发生率从20.6%到33.3%不等。在其中4个病例中,缺乏督导医师显著影响了并发症发生率。例如,局部麻醉下IC-PC - AN患者的并发症发生率为16.0%,而在没有医生监督的情况下,并发症发生率为23.8%。结论:基于患者、手术和操作人员因素的多因素评估提供了更可靠的风险评估,有助于改善临床病程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信