Developing intervention fidelity strategies for a behaviour change intervention delivered in primary care dental practices: the RETURN fidelity strategy.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Victoria Lowers, B Young, R V Harris
{"title":"Developing intervention fidelity strategies for a behaviour change intervention delivered in primary care dental practices: the RETURN fidelity strategy.","authors":"Victoria Lowers, B Young, R V Harris","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02732-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behaviour change interventions delivered in real-world settings could be vulnerable to threats to internal and external validity if methodological considerations are overlooked. The primary dental care setting is a difficult environment within which to deliver research protocols presenting unique challenges for robust scientific research delivery. Intervention fidelity strategies are an important mechanism to improve the scientific rigor of such studies. Feasibility studies provide a vital opportunity to refine and optimise research processes and implementation strategies before embarking on larger scale projects. This paper sets out the development of a comprehensive intervention fidelity strategy guided by The National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium.(BCC) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using observations (53 h) and qualitative interviews (17 patient interviews and 2 staff interviews) conducted during the delivery of the RETURN feasibility study (InteRventions to rEduce inequaliTies in the Uptake of Routine deNtal care), an intervention fidelity strategy was developed for use in the RETURN main trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comprehensive intervention fidelity strategy was developed, structured around the five domains of the BCC's recommendations (design, training, delivery, receipt, enactment) and attending to the goals pertaining to each of those domains. This paper sets out the fidelity strategy implemented in the RETURN main trial.</p><p><strong>Implications and conclusions: </strong>The RETURN fidelity strategy was influenced by the unique research environment the primary dental care setting presents. The strategy could serve as a blueprint to other researchers conducting research in similar settings. It is also intended that this strategy is read alongside the RETURN results upon their publication.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN10853330, registered: 07/10/2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02732-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behaviour change interventions delivered in real-world settings could be vulnerable to threats to internal and external validity if methodological considerations are overlooked. The primary dental care setting is a difficult environment within which to deliver research protocols presenting unique challenges for robust scientific research delivery. Intervention fidelity strategies are an important mechanism to improve the scientific rigor of such studies. Feasibility studies provide a vital opportunity to refine and optimise research processes and implementation strategies before embarking on larger scale projects. This paper sets out the development of a comprehensive intervention fidelity strategy guided by The National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium.(BCC) recommendations.

Method: Using observations (53 h) and qualitative interviews (17 patient interviews and 2 staff interviews) conducted during the delivery of the RETURN feasibility study (InteRventions to rEduce inequaliTies in the Uptake of Routine deNtal care), an intervention fidelity strategy was developed for use in the RETURN main trial.

Results: A comprehensive intervention fidelity strategy was developed, structured around the five domains of the BCC's recommendations (design, training, delivery, receipt, enactment) and attending to the goals pertaining to each of those domains. This paper sets out the fidelity strategy implemented in the RETURN main trial.

Implications and conclusions: The RETURN fidelity strategy was influenced by the unique research environment the primary dental care setting presents. The strategy could serve as a blueprint to other researchers conducting research in similar settings. It is also intended that this strategy is read alongside the RETURN results upon their publication.

Trial registration: ISRCTN10853330, registered: 07/10/2019.

为初级保健牙科实践中提供的行为改变干预制定干预保真策略:回归保真策略。
背景:如果忽视方法学方面的考虑,在现实环境中实施的行为改变干预措施可能容易受到内部和外部有效性的威胁。初级牙科保健设置是一个困难的环境,其中提供研究方案提出了强大的科学研究交付独特的挑战。干预保真策略是提高此类研究科学严谨性的重要机制。可行性研究为在开展更大规模项目之前完善和优化研究过程和实施战略提供了重要机会。本文在美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟(BCC)的建议指导下,阐述了一种综合干预保真策略的发展。方法:通过在RETURN可行性研究(减少常规牙科护理不平等的干预措施)期间进行的观察(53小时)和定性访谈(17名患者访谈和2名工作人员访谈),制定了用于RETURN主要试验的干预保真策略。结果:制定了一项全面的干预保真策略,围绕BCC建议的五个领域(设计、培训、交付、接收、制定)构建,并关注与每个领域相关的目标。本文阐述了在RETURN主试验中实施的保真度策略。含义和结论:回归保真度策略受到初级牙科保健设置的独特研究环境的影响。该策略可以作为在类似环境下进行研究的其他研究人员的蓝图。还打算将此策略与出版后的RETURN结果一起阅读。试验注册:ISRCTN10853330,注册日期:07/10/2019。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信