Mass spectrometry-based ligand binding assays in biomedical research.

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Expert Review of Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1080/14789450.2025.2467263
Tobias Meisinger, Amelie Vogt, Robin Kretz, Helen S Hammer, Hannes Planatscher, Oliver Poetz
{"title":"Mass spectrometry-based ligand binding assays in biomedical research.","authors":"Tobias Meisinger, Amelie Vogt, Robin Kretz, Helen S Hammer, Hannes Planatscher, Oliver Poetz","doi":"10.1080/14789450.2025.2467263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ligand binding assays combining immunoaffinity enrichment steps with mass spectrometry (MS) readout have gained attention as a highly specific and sensitive tool for protein quantification. These techniques typically combine enzymatic fragmentation of the sample or enriched protein with capture on the protein or peptide-level for quantification. Antibodies ensure specific target recognition, while MS offers quantitative accuracy with isotopically labeled internal standards. This dual approach supports a broad dynamic range, enabling protein measurements from picomolar to nanomolar levels. These methods have diverse applications, from quantifying signaling proteins in basic research to biomarker monitoring in clinical trials and analyzing the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review delves into the diverse workflows of immunoaffinity-MS, shedding light on the innovative strategies employed, their practical applications, efficacy, and inherent limitations in the realm of protein quantification.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Immunoaffinity-MS has transformed protein analysis, but widespread adoption is hindered by complex workflows, high instrument costs, and limited capture molecule availability. Efforts to enhance automation, standardize workflows, and advance technological innovation aim to overcome these barriers. Improvements in mass spectrometer sensitivity, advances in recombinant capture technologies, and support from public initiatives are poised to further improve the reliability and accessibility of this method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50463,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":"123-140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2025.2467263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ligand binding assays combining immunoaffinity enrichment steps with mass spectrometry (MS) readout have gained attention as a highly specific and sensitive tool for protein quantification. These techniques typically combine enzymatic fragmentation of the sample or enriched protein with capture on the protein or peptide-level for quantification. Antibodies ensure specific target recognition, while MS offers quantitative accuracy with isotopically labeled internal standards. This dual approach supports a broad dynamic range, enabling protein measurements from picomolar to nanomolar levels. These methods have diverse applications, from quantifying signaling proteins in basic research to biomarker monitoring in clinical trials and analyzing the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic proteins.

Areas covered: This review delves into the diverse workflows of immunoaffinity-MS, shedding light on the innovative strategies employed, their practical applications, efficacy, and inherent limitations in the realm of protein quantification.

Expert opinion: Immunoaffinity-MS has transformed protein analysis, but widespread adoption is hindered by complex workflows, high instrument costs, and limited capture molecule availability. Efforts to enhance automation, standardize workflows, and advance technological innovation aim to overcome these barriers. Improvements in mass spectrometer sensitivity, advances in recombinant capture technologies, and support from public initiatives are poised to further improve the reliability and accessibility of this method.

生物医学研究中基于质谱的配体结合分析。
结合免疫亲和富集步骤和质谱(MS)读数的配体结合试验作为一种高度特异性和敏感性的蛋白质定量工具受到了关注。这些技术通常将样品或富集蛋白的酶裂解与蛋白质或肽水平的捕获相结合以进行定量。抗体确保特定的目标识别,而质谱提供定量准确性与同位素标记的内部标准。这种双重方法支持广泛的动态范围,使蛋白质测量从皮摩尔到纳摩尔水平。这些方法有多种应用,从基础研究中的信号蛋白定量到临床试验中的生物标志物监测和治疗蛋白的药代动力学分析。涵盖领域:本综述深入研究了免疫亲和-质谱的不同工作流程,揭示了所采用的创新策略,它们的实际应用,功效和蛋白质定量领域的固有局限性。专家意见:免疫亲和-质谱已经改变了蛋白质分析,但由于复杂的工作流程、高昂的仪器成本和有限的捕获分子可用性,阻碍了广泛采用。提高自动化、标准化工作流程和推进技术创新的努力旨在克服这些障碍。质谱仪灵敏度的提高、重组捕获技术的进步以及公众倡议的支持将进一步提高该方法的可靠性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Proteomics
Expert Review of Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Proteomics (ISSN 1478-9450) seeks to collect together technologies, methods and discoveries from the field of proteomics to advance scientific understanding of the many varied roles protein expression plays in human health and disease. The journal coverage includes, but is not limited to, overviews of specific technological advances in the development of protein arrays, interaction maps, data archives and biological assays, performance of new technologies and prospects for future drug discovery. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies and a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Article highlights - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信