Bystander assessments for hazardous alcohol use: Qualitative methods for item development informed by bystander theory.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michelle Haikalis, Rochelle K Rosen, Matthew K Meisel, Lindsay M Orchowski, Kate B Carey, Jennifer E Merrill, Kelli Bradley, Nancy P Barnett
{"title":"Bystander assessments for hazardous alcohol use: Qualitative methods for item development informed by bystander theory.","authors":"Michelle Haikalis, Rochelle K Rosen, Matthew K Meisel, Lindsay M Orchowski, Kate B Carey, Jennifer E Merrill, Kelli Bradley, Nancy P Barnett","doi":"10.1037/adb0001050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i><b>Objective</b></i>: Dissemination of methods for developing psychometric instruments is essential for the production of high-quality research. This article describes a multistep process used to conduct the qualitative phase in the development of a battery of measures related to bystander behavior for hazardous alcohol use among young adults. <i><b>Method</b></i>: Qualitative methods were used to inform the content and wording of developed items to be relevant to young adults' lived experiences. First, focus groups (eight groups; <i>N</i> = 60) used multiple approaches to revise items on available bystander measures from the interpersonal violence prevention literature and to create new items relevant for hazardous drinking situations. Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts yielded several themes within identified categories of signs (i.e., exposure to hazardous drinking), strategies, barriers, facilitators, positive consequences, and negative consequences. Following item development and revision by a team of content experts, cognitive interviews (<i>N</i> = 20) ensured clarity of instructions, items, and response options. <b><i>Results</i></b>: This qualitative work yielded item sets that are ready to move on to administration for quantitative psychometric validation. We used a rigorous qualitative approach to ensure constructs, items, and eventual measures accurately reflect the experience of witnesses to hazardous drinking among others. <b><i>Conclusions</i></b>: Generated item sets will facilitate research applying bystander intervention to alcohol-related harm. Qualitative methods described herein should be useful for researchers applying existing frameworks to new areas and themes identified from this work will facilitate research focused on bystander intervention to prevent alcohol-related harms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":"39 1","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dissemination of methods for developing psychometric instruments is essential for the production of high-quality research. This article describes a multistep process used to conduct the qualitative phase in the development of a battery of measures related to bystander behavior for hazardous alcohol use among young adults. Method: Qualitative methods were used to inform the content and wording of developed items to be relevant to young adults' lived experiences. First, focus groups (eight groups; N = 60) used multiple approaches to revise items on available bystander measures from the interpersonal violence prevention literature and to create new items relevant for hazardous drinking situations. Thematic analysis of focus group transcripts yielded several themes within identified categories of signs (i.e., exposure to hazardous drinking), strategies, barriers, facilitators, positive consequences, and negative consequences. Following item development and revision by a team of content experts, cognitive interviews (N = 20) ensured clarity of instructions, items, and response options. Results: This qualitative work yielded item sets that are ready to move on to administration for quantitative psychometric validation. We used a rigorous qualitative approach to ensure constructs, items, and eventual measures accurately reflect the experience of witnesses to hazardous drinking among others. Conclusions: Generated item sets will facilitate research applying bystander intervention to alcohol-related harm. Qualitative methods described herein should be useful for researchers applying existing frameworks to new areas and themes identified from this work will facilitate research focused on bystander intervention to prevent alcohol-related harms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信