Is there any difference in the perioperative outcome between male and female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion? A propensity score matching analysis study of 570 patients.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chee Kidd Chiu, Siti Mariam Abd Gani, Yuki Mihara, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Chris Yin Wei Chan, Mun Keong Kwan
{"title":"Is there any difference in the perioperative outcome between male and female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion? A propensity score matching analysis study of 570 patients.","authors":"Chee Kidd Chiu, Siti Mariam Abd Gani, Yuki Mihara, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Chris Yin Wei Chan, Mun Keong Kwan","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01057-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the perioperative outcome differences between male and female AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of 570 patients (84 male, 486 female). Patients were divided into male and female groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed with match tolerance of 0.005. Preoperative data collected were age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), Lenke curve classification, preoperative Cobb angle, and preoperative flexibility. Intraoperative data collected were operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, amount of salvaged blood, number of patients required transfusion, number of screws and fusion level. Postoperative data collected were postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate, length of postoperative hospital stay and perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before matching, age, height, weight, and fusion level showed significant difference between genders (p < 0.05). After matching, there was no difference in the perioperative outcome parameters. When matched patients excluding height and weight, males had significantly longer wound, higher intraoperative blood loss and more blood salvaged from cell saver. When matched patients excluding fusion levels, males had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss. When matched patients excluding age, we found no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Male AIS patients who underwent PSF surgeries were older, taller, heavier and had longer fusion levels but there was no difference in perioperative outcomes between matched male and female patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01057-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the perioperative outcome differences between male and female AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgeries.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of 570 patients (84 male, 486 female). Patients were divided into male and female groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed with match tolerance of 0.005. Preoperative data collected were age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), Lenke curve classification, preoperative Cobb angle, and preoperative flexibility. Intraoperative data collected were operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, amount of salvaged blood, number of patients required transfusion, number of screws and fusion level. Postoperative data collected were postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate, length of postoperative hospital stay and perioperative complications.

Results: Before matching, age, height, weight, and fusion level showed significant difference between genders (p < 0.05). After matching, there was no difference in the perioperative outcome parameters. When matched patients excluding height and weight, males had significantly longer wound, higher intraoperative blood loss and more blood salvaged from cell saver. When matched patients excluding fusion levels, males had significantly higher intraoperative blood loss. When matched patients excluding age, we found no significant differences.

Conclusion: Male AIS patients who underwent PSF surgeries were older, taller, heavier and had longer fusion levels but there was no difference in perioperative outcomes between matched male and female patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信