Examining Different Methods to Assess Busulfan Exposure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Maxwell Thompson, Christine E Staatz, Christopher J Fraser, Stefanie Hennig, Rachael Lawson
{"title":"Examining Different Methods to Assess Busulfan Exposure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Maxwell Thompson, Christine E Staatz, Christopher J Fraser, Stefanie Hennig, Rachael Lawson","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based method (MBM) can be used to estimate the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUCcum) during therapeutic drug monitoring. Understanding predictive differences among these techniques should assist in switching between them and interpreting their results. The aim of this study was to compare busulfan AUCcum prediction based on NCA technique (Kinetica) and MBM (NextDose) applied to the same concentration-time data from pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on busulfan therapy administered once daily through intermittent infusion were obtained from 4 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Busulfan concentrations were measured at 3, 3.25, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after infusion initiation over 4 treatment days. Information on busulfan dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and patient covariate factors (if required) were supplied sequentially to Kinetica and NextDose to generate NCA-based and MBM-based predictions of busulfan exposure; differences in AUCcum estimates at the end of the treatment course were compared using Bland-Altman plots, box plots, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 90 HSCT recipients (2131 busulfan samples) were included. The median patient age and weight were 4.3 years and 17.0 kg, respectively. Median AUCcum estimated based on NCA and MBM were 78.0 mg.h/L [range: 51.7-107.0] and 85.5 mg.h/L [range: 60.6-120.8], respectively, with statistically significant difference in AUCcum values (P < 0.001). The mean percentage difference in AUCcum values between the 2 different methods suggested that if the AUCcum target using MBMs (NextDose) is 78-101 mg.h/L, then an equivalent target using NCA (Kinetica) would be reduced by 9.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When switching between NCA and MBMs to estimate busulfan AUCcum in pediatric HSCT recipients, a change in the target AUCcum is likely required to maintain a similar drug exposure during therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based method (MBM) can be used to estimate the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUCcum) during therapeutic drug monitoring. Understanding predictive differences among these techniques should assist in switching between them and interpreting their results. The aim of this study was to compare busulfan AUCcum prediction based on NCA technique (Kinetica) and MBM (NextDose) applied to the same concentration-time data from pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Methods: Data on busulfan therapy administered once daily through intermittent infusion were obtained from 4 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Busulfan concentrations were measured at 3, 3.25, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after infusion initiation over 4 treatment days. Information on busulfan dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and patient covariate factors (if required) were supplied sequentially to Kinetica and NextDose to generate NCA-based and MBM-based predictions of busulfan exposure; differences in AUCcum estimates at the end of the treatment course were compared using Bland-Altman plots, box plots, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

Results: Data from 90 HSCT recipients (2131 busulfan samples) were included. The median patient age and weight were 4.3 years and 17.0 kg, respectively. Median AUCcum estimated based on NCA and MBM were 78.0 mg.h/L [range: 51.7-107.0] and 85.5 mg.h/L [range: 60.6-120.8], respectively, with statistically significant difference in AUCcum values (P < 0.001). The mean percentage difference in AUCcum values between the 2 different methods suggested that if the AUCcum target using MBMs (NextDose) is 78-101 mg.h/L, then an equivalent target using NCA (Kinetica) would be reduced by 9.1%.

Conclusions: When switching between NCA and MBMs to estimate busulfan AUCcum in pediatric HSCT recipients, a change in the target AUCcum is likely required to maintain a similar drug exposure during therapeutic drug monitoring.

背景:非室分析法(NCA)和基于模型的方法(MBM)可用于估算治疗药物监测过程中的累积浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCcum)。了解这些技术之间的预测差异有助于在它们之间进行切换并解释其结果。本研究的目的是比较基于NCA技术(Kinetica)和MBM技术(NextDose)对儿科造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者相同浓度-时间数据进行的丁硫浓度-时间曲线下面积预测:方法:我们从澳大利亚和新西兰的4家医院获得了每天一次间歇输注硫丹治疗的数据。在4个治疗日中,分别于输注开始后的3、3.25、4、5、6和8小时测定了硫丹浓度。Kinetica和NextDose依次提供了有关硫丹剂量、药代动力学特征和患者协变量因素(如需要)的信息,以生成基于NCA和基于MBM的硫丹暴露预测;使用Bland-Altman图、盒图和Wilcoxon符号秩和检验比较了疗程结束时AUCcum估计值的差异:结果:共纳入了90名造血干细胞移植受者的数据(2131个硫丹样本)。患者年龄和体重的中位数分别为4.3岁和17.0公斤。根据NCA和MBM估计的中位AUCcum分别为78.0 mg.h/L [范围:51.7-107.0]和85.5 mg.h/L [范围:60.6-120.8],AUCcum值差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两种不同方法之间 AUCcum 值的平均百分比差异表明,如果使用 MBMs(NextDose)的 AUCcum 目标值为 78-101 mg.h/L,那么使用 NCA(Kinetica)的同等目标值将降低 9.1%:在儿科造血干细胞移植受者中切换 NCA 和 MBMs 来估算硫丹的 AUCcum 时,可能需要改变目标 AUCcum,以便在治疗药物监测期间保持相似的药物暴露量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信