Maxwell Thompson, Christine E Staatz, Christopher J Fraser, Stefanie Hennig, Rachael Lawson
{"title":"Examining Different Methods to Assess Busulfan Exposure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Maxwell Thompson, Christine E Staatz, Christopher J Fraser, Stefanie Hennig, Rachael Lawson","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based method (MBM) can be used to estimate the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUCcum) during therapeutic drug monitoring. Understanding predictive differences among these techniques should assist in switching between them and interpreting their results. The aim of this study was to compare busulfan AUCcum prediction based on NCA technique (Kinetica) and MBM (NextDose) applied to the same concentration-time data from pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on busulfan therapy administered once daily through intermittent infusion were obtained from 4 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Busulfan concentrations were measured at 3, 3.25, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after infusion initiation over 4 treatment days. Information on busulfan dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and patient covariate factors (if required) were supplied sequentially to Kinetica and NextDose to generate NCA-based and MBM-based predictions of busulfan exposure; differences in AUCcum estimates at the end of the treatment course were compared using Bland-Altman plots, box plots, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 90 HSCT recipients (2131 busulfan samples) were included. The median patient age and weight were 4.3 years and 17.0 kg, respectively. Median AUCcum estimated based on NCA and MBM were 78.0 mg.h/L [range: 51.7-107.0] and 85.5 mg.h/L [range: 60.6-120.8], respectively, with statistically significant difference in AUCcum values (P < 0.001). The mean percentage difference in AUCcum values between the 2 different methods suggested that if the AUCcum target using MBMs (NextDose) is 78-101 mg.h/L, then an equivalent target using NCA (Kinetica) would be reduced by 9.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When switching between NCA and MBMs to estimate busulfan AUCcum in pediatric HSCT recipients, a change in the target AUCcum is likely required to maintain a similar drug exposure during therapeutic drug monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based method (MBM) can be used to estimate the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUCcum) during therapeutic drug monitoring. Understanding predictive differences among these techniques should assist in switching between them and interpreting their results. The aim of this study was to compare busulfan AUCcum prediction based on NCA technique (Kinetica) and MBM (NextDose) applied to the same concentration-time data from pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.
Methods: Data on busulfan therapy administered once daily through intermittent infusion were obtained from 4 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Busulfan concentrations were measured at 3, 3.25, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after infusion initiation over 4 treatment days. Information on busulfan dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and patient covariate factors (if required) were supplied sequentially to Kinetica and NextDose to generate NCA-based and MBM-based predictions of busulfan exposure; differences in AUCcum estimates at the end of the treatment course were compared using Bland-Altman plots, box plots, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.
Results: Data from 90 HSCT recipients (2131 busulfan samples) were included. The median patient age and weight were 4.3 years and 17.0 kg, respectively. Median AUCcum estimated based on NCA and MBM were 78.0 mg.h/L [range: 51.7-107.0] and 85.5 mg.h/L [range: 60.6-120.8], respectively, with statistically significant difference in AUCcum values (P < 0.001). The mean percentage difference in AUCcum values between the 2 different methods suggested that if the AUCcum target using MBMs (NextDose) is 78-101 mg.h/L, then an equivalent target using NCA (Kinetica) would be reduced by 9.1%.
Conclusions: When switching between NCA and MBMs to estimate busulfan AUCcum in pediatric HSCT recipients, a change in the target AUCcum is likely required to maintain a similar drug exposure during therapeutic drug monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.