Network Meta-Analysis With Individual Participant-Level Data of Time-to-Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Kaiyuan Hua, Daniel Wojdyla, Anthony Carnicelli, Christopher Granger, Xiaofei Wang, Hwanhee Hong
{"title":"Network Meta-Analysis With Individual Participant-Level Data of Time-to-Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression.","authors":"Kaiyuan Hua, Daniel Wojdyla, Anthony Carnicelli, Christopher Granger, Xiaofei Wang, Hwanhee Hong","doi":"10.1002/sim.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accessibility of individual participant-level data (IPD) enhances the evaluation of moderation effects of patient covariates. It facilitates the provision of accurate estimation of intervention effects and confidence intervals by incorporating covariate correlations across multiple clinical trials. With a time-to-event outcome, Cox regression can be applied for network meta-analysis (NMA) using IPD. However, there lacks comprehensive reviews and comparisons of the specifications and assumptions of these Cox models and their impact on the interpretation of hazard ratios, effect moderation, and trial heterogeneity in IPD-NMA. In this paper, we examine various Cox models for IPD-NMA and compare different approaches to modeling trial, treatment, and covariate effects. We employ multiple graphical tools and statistical tests to assess proportional hazard assumptions and discuss their implications. Additionally, we explore the application of extended Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated. Practical guidance on interpreting and reporting NMA results is provided. A simulation study is conducted to compare the performance of different models. We illustrate the methods to conduct IPD-NMA through a real data example.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 5","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accessibility of individual participant-level data (IPD) enhances the evaluation of moderation effects of patient covariates. It facilitates the provision of accurate estimation of intervention effects and confidence intervals by incorporating covariate correlations across multiple clinical trials. With a time-to-event outcome, Cox regression can be applied for network meta-analysis (NMA) using IPD. However, there lacks comprehensive reviews and comparisons of the specifications and assumptions of these Cox models and their impact on the interpretation of hazard ratios, effect moderation, and trial heterogeneity in IPD-NMA. In this paper, we examine various Cox models for IPD-NMA and compare different approaches to modeling trial, treatment, and covariate effects. We employ multiple graphical tools and statistical tests to assess proportional hazard assumptions and discuss their implications. Additionally, we explore the application of extended Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated. Practical guidance on interpreting and reporting NMA results is provided. A simulation study is conducted to compare the performance of different models. We illustrate the methods to conduct IPD-NMA through a real data example.

个人参与者水平数据(IPD)的可获得性增强了对患者协变量调节效应的评估。它通过纳入多项临床试验中的协变量相关性,有助于准确估计干预效果和置信区间。对于从时间到事件的结果,Cox 回归可用于使用 IPD 进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。然而,对于这些 Cox 模型的规范和假设及其对 IPD-NMA 中危险比、效应调节和试验异质性解释的影响,目前还缺乏全面的综述和比较。在本文中,我们研究了 IPD-NMA 的各种 Cox 模型,并比较了对试验、治疗和协方差效应建模的不同方法。我们采用多种图形工具和统计检验来评估比例危险假设并讨论其影响。此外,我们还探讨了在违反比例危险假设时扩展 Cox 模型的应用。我们还提供了解释和报告 NMA 结果的实用指导。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以比较不同模型的性能。我们通过一个真实数据示例说明了进行 IPD-NMA 的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信