[Respiratory therapists in Germany: An analysis of their current training and work situation].

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumologie Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2510-2625
Dennis Flügge, Matthias Held
{"title":"[Respiratory therapists in Germany: An analysis of their current training and work situation].","authors":"Dennis Flügge, Matthias Held","doi":"10.1055/a-2510-2625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there has been a trainee program for respiratory therapists since 18 years, a representative survey of this field of activity is lacking. The aim of this study was to find out which professional groups felt addressed by the training program, how satisfied they were with the training and where the respiratory therapists were employed, to take a look at the organisation of the working conditions after further training and how cooperation with other professional groups functioned. An investigation into whether there were factors that had an influence on the above-mentioned points should provide an outlook on how respiratory therapy in Germany was likely to develop in the future and what would be important for its future work.In a quantitative cross-sectional study, a partially anonymised electronic survey was conducted among prospective and trained respiratory therapists in Germany. The survey was analysed using the (browser-based) programme \"Online Umfrage.com\" and the spreadsheet programme Microsoft Excel. The open questions were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.307 prospective and postgraduate respiratory therapists from all federal states and with varying years of continuing education took part in the survey. Most of the respondents worked in the clinical field; 90% of the respondents were rather or very satisfied with their further training. A quarter of them got no time off at all from work or only partially to participate in continuing education. Half of the respondents had not been able to get better salaries following their further training. Nevertheless, 81.25% of respiratory therapists said they would recommend the training programme to others. When asked what was important for the future, the answers varied and ranged from state recognition and better cooperation between training providers to better public relations work.Further training to become a respiratory therapist is seen as very positive. However, there are still significant problems in the areas of remuneration, time off and further training development. The type of supervisor was identified as one of the most important influencing factors. Thus, respiratory therapists who were subordinated to the medical service were more satisfied than those placed under the nursing service management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20197,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2510-2625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there has been a trainee program for respiratory therapists since 18 years, a representative survey of this field of activity is lacking. The aim of this study was to find out which professional groups felt addressed by the training program, how satisfied they were with the training and where the respiratory therapists were employed, to take a look at the organisation of the working conditions after further training and how cooperation with other professional groups functioned. An investigation into whether there were factors that had an influence on the above-mentioned points should provide an outlook on how respiratory therapy in Germany was likely to develop in the future and what would be important for its future work.In a quantitative cross-sectional study, a partially anonymised electronic survey was conducted among prospective and trained respiratory therapists in Germany. The survey was analysed using the (browser-based) programme "Online Umfrage.com" and the spreadsheet programme Microsoft Excel. The open questions were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.307 prospective and postgraduate respiratory therapists from all federal states and with varying years of continuing education took part in the survey. Most of the respondents worked in the clinical field; 90% of the respondents were rather or very satisfied with their further training. A quarter of them got no time off at all from work or only partially to participate in continuing education. Half of the respondents had not been able to get better salaries following their further training. Nevertheless, 81.25% of respiratory therapists said they would recommend the training programme to others. When asked what was important for the future, the answers varied and ranged from state recognition and better cooperation between training providers to better public relations work.Further training to become a respiratory therapist is seen as very positive. However, there are still significant problems in the areas of remuneration, time off and further training development. The type of supervisor was identified as one of the most important influencing factors. Thus, respiratory therapists who were subordinated to the medical service were more satisfied than those placed under the nursing service management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pneumologie
Pneumologie RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
416
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie DGP Organ des Deutschen Zentralkomitees zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose DZK Organ des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen BdP Fachärzte für Lungen- und Bronchialheilkunde, Pneumologen und Allergologen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信