Translating digital health services for nutrition care management of chronic conditions in outpatient settings: A multi-stakeholder e-Delphi study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12927
Amandine Barnett, Ingrid J Hickman, Katrina L Campbell, Jaimon T Kelly
{"title":"Translating digital health services for nutrition care management of chronic conditions in outpatient settings: A multi-stakeholder e-Delphi study.","authors":"Amandine Barnett, Ingrid J Hickman, Katrina L Campbell, Jaimon T Kelly","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and achieve expert consensus on the most important and feasible strategies to implement digital health services for nutrition care management of chronic conditions in outpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Determinants and strategies for implementing digital health services for nutrition care management were identified in line with the literature and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. These were presented to team leaders and senior clinicians, as well as dietetic and allied health directors in a two-round e-Delphi process. Consensus was reached when strategies were rated very important/feasible by at least 75% of respondents, calculated by the median, interquartile range and frequency. Following the two survey rounds, a final prioritisation survey was distributed to participants, where participants were asked to prioritise their top strategy for each determinant, which was analysed by frequency calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants participated in round one of the survey and 18 completed the final prioritisation round. Following the two rounds, 3 strategies did not meet consensus for importance and 7 strategies did not meet consensus for feasibility out of 25 strategies presented. Nine strategies were prioritised following the survey rounds. Key concepts of the strategies that met consensus and were prioritised related to (i) adhering to quality of care with effective evaluation processes; (ii) providing options for digital health upskilling and support; and (iii) individualising patient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Team leaders and senior clinicians as well as dietetic and allied health directors have indicated that there are many important digital health strategies yet not all are feasible to implement within current resourcing and systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"231-243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To identify and achieve expert consensus on the most important and feasible strategies to implement digital health services for nutrition care management of chronic conditions in outpatient settings.

Methods: Determinants and strategies for implementing digital health services for nutrition care management were identified in line with the literature and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. These were presented to team leaders and senior clinicians, as well as dietetic and allied health directors in a two-round e-Delphi process. Consensus was reached when strategies were rated very important/feasible by at least 75% of respondents, calculated by the median, interquartile range and frequency. Following the two survey rounds, a final prioritisation survey was distributed to participants, where participants were asked to prioritise their top strategy for each determinant, which was analysed by frequency calculations.

Results: Twenty participants participated in round one of the survey and 18 completed the final prioritisation round. Following the two rounds, 3 strategies did not meet consensus for importance and 7 strategies did not meet consensus for feasibility out of 25 strategies presented. Nine strategies were prioritised following the survey rounds. Key concepts of the strategies that met consensus and were prioritised related to (i) adhering to quality of care with effective evaluation processes; (ii) providing options for digital health upskilling and support; and (iii) individualising patient care.

Conclusion: Team leaders and senior clinicians as well as dietetic and allied health directors have indicated that there are many important digital health strategies yet not all are feasible to implement within current resourcing and systems.

Abstract Image

将数字健康服务转化为门诊慢性病的营养护理管理:一项多方利益相关者的电子德尔福研究。
目的:确定并达成专家共识的最重要和可行的战略,以实施数字卫生服务的营养保健管理慢性病门诊设置。方法:根据文献和实施研究综合框架确定实施营养保健管理数字卫生服务的决定因素和策略。在两轮电子德尔福程序中,将这些报告提交给小组领导和高级临床医生,以及饮食和联合卫生主任。当策略被至少75%的受访者评为非常重要/可行时,通过中位数,四分位数范围和频率计算,达成共识。在两轮调查之后,最终的优先级调查被分发给参与者,参与者被要求优先考虑每个决定因素的最高策略,并通过频率计算进行分析。结果:20名参与者参加了第一轮调查,18名完成了最后一轮优先排序。在两轮讨论之后,在提出的25个战略中,有3个战略在重要性方面没有达成共识,7个战略在可行性方面没有达成共识。在几轮调查之后,确定了九项战略的优先次序。符合协商一致意见并被列为优先事项的战略的关键概念涉及:(i)通过有效的评价程序坚持护理质量;㈡提供数字卫生技能提升和支持的备选方案;(三)个性化病人护理。结论:团队领导和高级临床医生以及饮食和联合卫生主任表示,有许多重要的数字卫生战略,但并非所有战略都可以在当前的资源和系统中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信