Jörg Wulff, Benjamin Koska, Michael Giese, Christian Bäumer, Ronald Richter, Andreas Foerster, Nikolaos E Bechrakis, Beate Timmermann
{"title":"Evaluation of OPTOS wide-field fundus image projections for radiotherapy planning of uveal melanoma.","authors":"Jörg Wulff, Benjamin Koska, Michael Giese, Christian Bäumer, Ronald Richter, Andreas Foerster, Nikolaos E Bechrakis, Beate Timmermann","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the relationship between the stereographic and azimuthal equidistant projection (AEP) of the human retina for radiotherapy planning with OPTOS optomap wide-field fundus images (Optos, UK). Further, the geometric accuracy of an OPTOS fundus image is quantified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The fundamental relationship between both projection modes was applied to transform images acquired with an OPTOS Silverstone camera to the azimuthal equidistant projection using MATLAB. Fundus images of four patients were used to quantitatively demonstrate the impact for neglecting the proper projection. For that purpose, a delineated contour for each patient was analyzed if created in a treatment planning system, which assumes AEP, and compared with an OPTOS image. Furthermore, an eye model with a novel 3D printed retina pattern was used to quantify the geometric accuracy for an OPTOS optomap image.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The difference between both projections was found substantial, leading to a change in delineated contours of more than 5 mm in the investigated cases and a change of delineated area of more than 40%. The geometric accuracy of OPTOS images of a customized eye model was found to be 0.2 mm on average, increasing to at most ∼0.5 mm at eye angles of 81°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fundamental difference in the representation of the eye fundus needs to be accounted for in radiotherapy planning of uveal melanoma. The basic underlying relationship for transformation is known, but more research is required to quantify other aberrations. The novel use of 3D printed retina patterns with known dimensions is providing a flexible approach for further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between the stereographic and azimuthal equidistant projection (AEP) of the human retina for radiotherapy planning with OPTOS optomap wide-field fundus images (Optos, UK). Further, the geometric accuracy of an OPTOS fundus image is quantified.
Methods: The fundamental relationship between both projection modes was applied to transform images acquired with an OPTOS Silverstone camera to the azimuthal equidistant projection using MATLAB. Fundus images of four patients were used to quantitatively demonstrate the impact for neglecting the proper projection. For that purpose, a delineated contour for each patient was analyzed if created in a treatment planning system, which assumes AEP, and compared with an OPTOS image. Furthermore, an eye model with a novel 3D printed retina pattern was used to quantify the geometric accuracy for an OPTOS optomap image.
Results: The difference between both projections was found substantial, leading to a change in delineated contours of more than 5 mm in the investigated cases and a change of delineated area of more than 40%. The geometric accuracy of OPTOS images of a customized eye model was found to be 0.2 mm on average, increasing to at most ∼0.5 mm at eye angles of 81°.
Conclusion: The fundamental difference in the representation of the eye fundus needs to be accounted for in radiotherapy planning of uveal melanoma. The basic underlying relationship for transformation is known, but more research is required to quantify other aberrations. The novel use of 3D printed retina patterns with known dimensions is providing a flexible approach for further investigations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic