{"title":"Commissioning of Halcyon enhanced leaf model in the Eclipse treatment planning system: Focus on simple slit fields and VMAT dose calculation.","authors":"Ryohei Miyasaka, Mari Shirai, Mitsunobu Igari, Yume Kojima, Yuki Kozawa, Toru Kawachi, Ryusuke Hara","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in Halcyon adds complexities to the dose calculation process owing to the variability of dosimetric characteristics with leaf motion. Recently, an enhanced leaf model (ELM) was developed to refine the MLC model in the Eclipse treatment planning system. This study investigates the performance of the Halcyon ELM by verifying doses for simple slit fields and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dose calculations were performed with Acuros XB using the ELM. To commission the leaf-tip model, the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was calculated (referred to as DLG<sub>ELM</sub>) and compared with Halcyon measurements. The DLGs were assessed under conditions both with and without leaf trailing between the MLC layers. The tongue-and-groove (TG) model was evaluated by comparing leaf-edge profiles and the outputs of the asynchronous sweeping gap. Furthermore, eleven VMAT plans were validated against chamber doses and Delta4 measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLG<sub>ELM</sub> demonstrated variation between layers, measuring 0.42 mm for the proximal layer and 0.23 mm for the distal layer, and showed a correspondence with the measured DLGs in 0.1 mm. Additionally, ELM reduced the discrepancy between calculated and measured DLGs when accounting for leaf trailing. In the TG model test, ELM calculations successfully mirrored the measured leaf-edge profiles. Moreover, the median dose difference between ELM calculations and chamber doses was -0.8% in asynchronous sweeping gaps. In the VMAT dose verification, the incorporation of ELM enhanced the target dose and resulted in a gamma pass rate (2%/2 mm) exceeding 95%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Halcyon ELM considerably improved the accuracy of simulating actual leaf-tip transmission, both with and without leaf trailing, and it effectively accounted for the additional blocking caused by TG design. Furthermore, the introduction of ELM in Eclipse considerably enhanced the VMAT dose calculation. ELM addresses the limitations of traditional leaf models and reduces uncertainties in Halcyon dose calculations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) in Halcyon adds complexities to the dose calculation process owing to the variability of dosimetric characteristics with leaf motion. Recently, an enhanced leaf model (ELM) was developed to refine the MLC model in the Eclipse treatment planning system. This study investigates the performance of the Halcyon ELM by verifying doses for simple slit fields and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.
Materials and methods: Dose calculations were performed with Acuros XB using the ELM. To commission the leaf-tip model, the dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was calculated (referred to as DLGELM) and compared with Halcyon measurements. The DLGs were assessed under conditions both with and without leaf trailing between the MLC layers. The tongue-and-groove (TG) model was evaluated by comparing leaf-edge profiles and the outputs of the asynchronous sweeping gap. Furthermore, eleven VMAT plans were validated against chamber doses and Delta4 measurements.
Results: DLGELM demonstrated variation between layers, measuring 0.42 mm for the proximal layer and 0.23 mm for the distal layer, and showed a correspondence with the measured DLGs in 0.1 mm. Additionally, ELM reduced the discrepancy between calculated and measured DLGs when accounting for leaf trailing. In the TG model test, ELM calculations successfully mirrored the measured leaf-edge profiles. Moreover, the median dose difference between ELM calculations and chamber doses was -0.8% in asynchronous sweeping gaps. In the VMAT dose verification, the incorporation of ELM enhanced the target dose and resulted in a gamma pass rate (2%/2 mm) exceeding 95%.
Conclusion: Halcyon ELM considerably improved the accuracy of simulating actual leaf-tip transmission, both with and without leaf trailing, and it effectively accounted for the additional blocking caused by TG design. Furthermore, the introduction of ELM in Eclipse considerably enhanced the VMAT dose calculation. ELM addresses the limitations of traditional leaf models and reduces uncertainties in Halcyon dose calculations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic