Sensitive detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease by a novel index of pressure-area relationship of the brachial artery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chikage Oshita, Takuya Nishikawa, Kazunori Uemura, Yuko Uchimura, Hiroki Teragawa
{"title":"Sensitive detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease by a novel index of pressure-area relationship of the brachial artery.","authors":"Chikage Oshita, Takuya Nishikawa, Kazunori Uemura, Yuko Uchimura, Hiroki Teragawa","doi":"10.1007/s00380-025-02528-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional area (eA) and volumetric elastic modulus (V<sub>E</sub>) of the brachial artery estimated by an oscillometric device have been introduced to evaluate the degree of severity of atherosclerosis. However, there were concerns over the clinical efficacy of eA and V<sub>E</sub>. In this study, we searched for a novel device-based index that effectively evaluates atherosclerosis, and compared its efficacy in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) with conventional indexes comprising eA, V<sub>E</sub>, carotid maximum intima-media thickness (IMT), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD). The Health Chronos TM-2772 device approximates the arterial pressure-area relation to a logarithmic function. We hypothesized that the asymptotic pressure (P<sub>a</sub>) of the logarithmic function that reflects the shift of the relation on the pressure axis may be effective in evaluating atherosclerosis. The diagnostic abilities of eA, V<sub>E</sub>, P<sub>a</sub>, IMT, CAVI, and FMD to detect CAD were analyzed in 60 patients who were classified into CAD (n = 30) and non-CAD (n = 30) groups based on coronary angiographic findings. In CAD group, P<sub>a</sub> and FMD were significantly lower, and max-IMT was significantly higher than the respective indices in non-CAD group. eA, V<sub>E</sub>, and CAVI showed no significant differences between the two groups. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of the indices for diagnosing the presence of CAD indicated that only P<sub>a</sub> [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.706, p < 0.01] and max-IMT (AUC = 0.752, p < 0.01) had acceptable diagnostic ability. The optimal cutoff values were 15.3 mmHg for P<sub>a</sub> (sensitivity 77%, specificity 67%) and 1.6 mm for max-IMT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 71%). In conclusion, P<sub>a</sub> may be a sensitive and effective index for evaluating the severity of atherosclerosis. Verification of the efficacy and usefulness of P<sub>a</sub> is warranted in further prospective multicenter studies and registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-025-02528-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-sectional area (eA) and volumetric elastic modulus (VE) of the brachial artery estimated by an oscillometric device have been introduced to evaluate the degree of severity of atherosclerosis. However, there were concerns over the clinical efficacy of eA and VE. In this study, we searched for a novel device-based index that effectively evaluates atherosclerosis, and compared its efficacy in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) with conventional indexes comprising eA, VE, carotid maximum intima-media thickness (IMT), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD). The Health Chronos TM-2772 device approximates the arterial pressure-area relation to a logarithmic function. We hypothesized that the asymptotic pressure (Pa) of the logarithmic function that reflects the shift of the relation on the pressure axis may be effective in evaluating atherosclerosis. The diagnostic abilities of eA, VE, Pa, IMT, CAVI, and FMD to detect CAD were analyzed in 60 patients who were classified into CAD (n = 30) and non-CAD (n = 30) groups based on coronary angiographic findings. In CAD group, Pa and FMD were significantly lower, and max-IMT was significantly higher than the respective indices in non-CAD group. eA, VE, and CAVI showed no significant differences between the two groups. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of the indices for diagnosing the presence of CAD indicated that only Pa [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.706, p < 0.01] and max-IMT (AUC = 0.752, p < 0.01) had acceptable diagnostic ability. The optimal cutoff values were 15.3 mmHg for Pa (sensitivity 77%, specificity 67%) and 1.6 mm for max-IMT (sensitivity 71%, specificity 71%). In conclusion, Pa may be a sensitive and effective index for evaluating the severity of atherosclerosis. Verification of the efficacy and usefulness of Pa is warranted in further prospective multicenter studies and registries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信