Factors influencing the establishment of hospital accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dilantha Dharmagunawardene, Paula Bowman, Mark Avery, David Greenfield, Reece Hinchcliff
{"title":"Factors influencing the establishment of hospital accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.","authors":"Dilantha Dharmagunawardene, Paula Bowman, Mark Avery, David Greenfield, Reece Hinchcliff","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospital accreditation programs are globally recognized as an important tool for enhancing quality and safety in health care; however, many programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are discontinued shortly after their establishment. This scoping review synthesized published evidence on factors influencing the establishment and sustainability of hospital accreditation programs in LMICs, to provide guidance to health stakeholders involved in these processes. Six databases were searched using the terms \"accreditation,\" \"health,\" \"hospital,\" and the country list of LMICs. Screening was undertaken collaboratively for validation. A framework to guide data extraction was developed by amalgamating eight existing classifications, theories, models, and frameworks concerning policy diffusion and implementation. The framework comprised the following domains: antecedent influences (A), contextual factors (C), establishment factors (E), standards, surveyors, stimulants (incentives), and survey-related factors (S-4S), governance (G), legislation (L), execution (implementation; E), and assessment and monitoring (AM), forming the ACES-GLEAM framework. Thirty-two sources were identified, with an increasing publication trend over time. The included studies reported upon a broad range of patterns, innovations, influencers, enablers, and barriers concerning accreditation program establishment in LMICs. Key questions emerged, including the degree of government involvement, incorporation of international standards versus development of bespoke standards, the use of local versus external surveyors, the use of financial and other incentives to promote engagement, and mandatory versus voluntary approaches of program implementation. Resource constraints were recognized as the most important barriers to sustainable establishment, while the influence of global accreditation and donor agencies were viewed as presenting both positive and negative impacts. Health stakeholders are encouraged to reflect upon and apply the ACES-GLEAM framework, incorporating the guiding principles outlined in this paper, to help establish hospital accreditation programs in LMICs in a way that facilitates sustainability and effectiveness over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"496-517"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospital accreditation programs are globally recognized as an important tool for enhancing quality and safety in health care; however, many programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are discontinued shortly after their establishment. This scoping review synthesized published evidence on factors influencing the establishment and sustainability of hospital accreditation programs in LMICs, to provide guidance to health stakeholders involved in these processes. Six databases were searched using the terms "accreditation," "health," "hospital," and the country list of LMICs. Screening was undertaken collaboratively for validation. A framework to guide data extraction was developed by amalgamating eight existing classifications, theories, models, and frameworks concerning policy diffusion and implementation. The framework comprised the following domains: antecedent influences (A), contextual factors (C), establishment factors (E), standards, surveyors, stimulants (incentives), and survey-related factors (S-4S), governance (G), legislation (L), execution (implementation; E), and assessment and monitoring (AM), forming the ACES-GLEAM framework. Thirty-two sources were identified, with an increasing publication trend over time. The included studies reported upon a broad range of patterns, innovations, influencers, enablers, and barriers concerning accreditation program establishment in LMICs. Key questions emerged, including the degree of government involvement, incorporation of international standards versus development of bespoke standards, the use of local versus external surveyors, the use of financial and other incentives to promote engagement, and mandatory versus voluntary approaches of program implementation. Resource constraints were recognized as the most important barriers to sustainable establishment, while the influence of global accreditation and donor agencies were viewed as presenting both positive and negative impacts. Health stakeholders are encouraged to reflect upon and apply the ACES-GLEAM framework, incorporating the guiding principles outlined in this paper, to help establish hospital accreditation programs in LMICs in a way that facilitates sustainability and effectiveness over time.

影响中低收入国家医院认证计划建立的因素:范围审查。
医院认证计划是全球公认的提高医疗质量和安全的重要工具;然而,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的许多项目在建立后不久就停止了。该范围审查综合了影响中低收入国家医院认证计划建立和可持续性的因素的已发表证据,为参与这些过程的卫生利益相关者提供指导。使用术语“认证”、“卫生”、“医院”和低收入和中等收入国家名单搜索了六个数据库。合作进行筛选以进行验证。通过合并有关政策扩散和执行的八种现有分类、理论、模型和框架,制定了一个指导数据提取的框架。该框架包括以下领域:前事影响(A)、情境因素(C)、确立因素(E)、标准、调查员、刺激物(激励)和调查相关因素(S-4S)、治理(G)、立法(L)、执行(实施;E),评估和监测(AM),形成ACES-GLEAM框架。确定了32个来源,随着时间的推移,出版趋势越来越多。纳入的研究报告了广泛的模式、创新、影响因素、推动因素和有关中低收入国家认证计划建立的障碍。关键问题出现了,包括政府参与的程度,国际标准的结合与定制标准的发展,使用本地与外部测量师,使用财政和其他激励措施来促进参与,以及强制性与自愿的方案实施方法。资源限制被认为是可持续建立的最重要障碍,而全球认证和捐助机构的影响被认为既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响。鼓励卫生利益相关者反思和应用纳入本文中概述的指导原则的ACES-GLEAM框架,以帮助在中低收入国家建立医院认证计划,以促进长期的可持续性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信