A machine learning model based on preoperative multiparametric quantitative DWI can effectively predict the survival and recurrence risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chao Qu, Piaoe Zeng, Changlei Li, Weiyu Hu, Dongxia Yang, Hangyan Wang, Huishu Yuan, Jingyu Cao, Dianrong Xiu
{"title":"A machine learning model based on preoperative multiparametric quantitative DWI can effectively predict the survival and recurrence risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Chao Qu, Piaoe Zeng, Changlei Li, Weiyu Hu, Dongxia Yang, Hangyan Wang, Huishu Yuan, Jingyu Cao, Dianrong Xiu","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01915-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a machine learning (ML) model combining preoperative multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and clinical features to better predict overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following radical surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection at two centers. Among 101 ML models tested for predicting postoperative OS and RFS, the best-performing model was identified based on comprehensive evaluation metrics, including C-index, Brier scores, AUC curves, clinical decision curves, and calibration curves. This model's risk stratification capability was further validated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random survival forest model achieved the highest C-index (0.828/0.723 for OS and 0.781/0.747 for RFS in training/validation cohorts). Incorporating nine key factors-D value, T-stage, ADC-value, postoperative 7th day CA19-9 level, AJCC stage, tumor differentiation, type of operation, tumor location, and age-optimized the model's predictive accuracy. The model had integrated Brier score below 0.13 and C/D AUC values above 0.85 for both OS and RFS predictions. It also outperformed traditional models in predictive ability and clinical benefit, as shown by clinical decision curves. Calibration curves confirmed good predictive consistency. Using cut-off scores of 16.73/29.05 for OS/RFS, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant prognostic differences between risk groups (p < 0.0001), highlighting the model's robust risk prediction and stratification capabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The random survival forest model, combining DWI and clinical features, accurately predicts survival and recurrence risk after radical resection of PDAC and effectively stratifies risk to guide clinical treatment.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>The construction of 101 ML models based on multiparametric quantitative DWI combined with clinical variables has enhanced the prediction performance for survival and recurrence risks in patients undergoing radical resection for PDAC.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>This study first develops DWI-based radiological-clinical ML models predicting PDAC prognosis. Among 101 models, RFS is the best and outperforms other traditional models. Multiparametric DWI is the key prognostic predictor, with model interpretations through SurvSHAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01915-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a machine learning (ML) model combining preoperative multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and clinical features to better predict overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following radical surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection at two centers. Among 101 ML models tested for predicting postoperative OS and RFS, the best-performing model was identified based on comprehensive evaluation metrics, including C-index, Brier scores, AUC curves, clinical decision curves, and calibration curves. This model's risk stratification capability was further validated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: The random survival forest model achieved the highest C-index (0.828/0.723 for OS and 0.781/0.747 for RFS in training/validation cohorts). Incorporating nine key factors-D value, T-stage, ADC-value, postoperative 7th day CA19-9 level, AJCC stage, tumor differentiation, type of operation, tumor location, and age-optimized the model's predictive accuracy. The model had integrated Brier score below 0.13 and C/D AUC values above 0.85 for both OS and RFS predictions. It also outperformed traditional models in predictive ability and clinical benefit, as shown by clinical decision curves. Calibration curves confirmed good predictive consistency. Using cut-off scores of 16.73/29.05 for OS/RFS, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant prognostic differences between risk groups (p < 0.0001), highlighting the model's robust risk prediction and stratification capabilities.

Conclusion: The random survival forest model, combining DWI and clinical features, accurately predicts survival and recurrence risk after radical resection of PDAC and effectively stratifies risk to guide clinical treatment.

Critical relevance statement: The construction of 101 ML models based on multiparametric quantitative DWI combined with clinical variables has enhanced the prediction performance for survival and recurrence risks in patients undergoing radical resection for PDAC.

Key points: This study first develops DWI-based radiological-clinical ML models predicting PDAC prognosis. Among 101 models, RFS is the best and outperforms other traditional models. Multiparametric DWI is the key prognostic predictor, with model interpretations through SurvSHAP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信