Development and application of predictive clinical biomarkers for low back pain care: recommendations from the ISSLS phenotype/precision spine focus group.
Paul W Hodges, Gwendolyn Sowa, Conor O'Neill, Nam Vo, Nadine Foster, Dino Samartzis, Jeffrey Lotz
{"title":"Development and application of predictive clinical biomarkers for low back pain care: recommendations from the ISSLS phenotype/precision spine focus group.","authors":"Paul W Hodges, Gwendolyn Sowa, Conor O'Neill, Nam Vo, Nadine Foster, Dino Samartzis, Jeffrey Lotz","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08720-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predictive biomarkers (or moderators of treatment) are features, or more likely feature clusters, that discriminate individuals who are more likely to experience a favourable or unfavourable effect from a specific treatment. Utilization of validated predictive biomarkers for chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatments is a plausible strategy to guide patients more rapidly to effective treatments thereby reducing wastage of finite healthcare funds on treatments that are ineffective (or potentially harmful). Yet, few predictive biomarkers have been successfully validated in clinical studies. This paper summarizes work by the Phenotype/Precision Spine Focus Group of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine that addressed: (1) relevant definitions for terminology; (2) advantages and disadvantages of different research approaches for the specification of predictive biomarkers; (3) methods for assessment of clinical validity; (4) approaches for their implementation; (5) barriers to predictive biomarker identification; and (6) a prioritised list of recommendations for the development and refinement of predictive biomarkers for CLBP. Key recommendations include the harmonisation of data collection, data sharing, integration of theoretical models, development of new treatments, and health economic analyses to inform cost-benefit of assessments and the application of matched treatments. The complexity of CLBP demands large datasets to derive meaningful progress. This will require coordinated and substantive collaboration involving multiple disciplines and across the research spectrum from the basic sciences to clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08720-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers (or moderators of treatment) are features, or more likely feature clusters, that discriminate individuals who are more likely to experience a favourable or unfavourable effect from a specific treatment. Utilization of validated predictive biomarkers for chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatments is a plausible strategy to guide patients more rapidly to effective treatments thereby reducing wastage of finite healthcare funds on treatments that are ineffective (or potentially harmful). Yet, few predictive biomarkers have been successfully validated in clinical studies. This paper summarizes work by the Phenotype/Precision Spine Focus Group of the International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine that addressed: (1) relevant definitions for terminology; (2) advantages and disadvantages of different research approaches for the specification of predictive biomarkers; (3) methods for assessment of clinical validity; (4) approaches for their implementation; (5) barriers to predictive biomarker identification; and (6) a prioritised list of recommendations for the development and refinement of predictive biomarkers for CLBP. Key recommendations include the harmonisation of data collection, data sharing, integration of theoretical models, development of new treatments, and health economic analyses to inform cost-benefit of assessments and the application of matched treatments. The complexity of CLBP demands large datasets to derive meaningful progress. This will require coordinated and substantive collaboration involving multiple disciplines and across the research spectrum from the basic sciences to clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe