Toxicity spectrum of taxanes: A safety analysis from pre-marketing to post-marketing.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Qiuling Zhao, Zilin Nian, Yimin He, Lijun Lai, Wenbin Liu, Shengqiang Huang, Lin Yang
{"title":"Toxicity spectrum of taxanes: A safety analysis from pre-marketing to post-marketing.","authors":"Qiuling Zhao, Zilin Nian, Yimin He, Lijun Lai, Wenbin Liu, Shengqiang Huang, Lin Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As fundamental chemotherapy drugs, paclitaxel and its derivatives are essential for cancer treatment. This analysis comprehensively evalutaed the toxicity spectrum of taxanes from the perspective of clinical trials and the real-world.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Pooled-analyses were performed to estimate incidences of adverse events (AEs) with random-effect models after searching databases. Reports of AEs were retrospectively obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and positive signals were quantified by employing three algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies involving 10,828 patients were analyzed in pooled-analysis and 58,835 case reports were retrieved. Leukopenia (59.69, 95% confidence interval 41.34-75.69) and neutropenia (29.69, 23.31-36.99) ranked first among all grades and severe AEs, respectively. Alopecia, regardless of grades, had the highest estimated incidence of non-hematological AEs. The estimated incidences of AEs of Nab-paclitaxel tended to be higher than other formulations, especially neutropenia (46.53, 35.01-58.42). Docetaxel had the least signals but alopecia and depression have quantified several signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The safety of nab-paclitaxel was beyond expectation and unusual signals of alopecia and depression of docetaxel need to be paid attention to. Results of clinical trials and FAERS indicated consistency between premarket and postmarket studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As fundamental chemotherapy drugs, paclitaxel and its derivatives are essential for cancer treatment. This analysis comprehensively evalutaed the toxicity spectrum of taxanes from the perspective of clinical trials and the real-world.

Research design and methods: Pooled-analyses were performed to estimate incidences of adverse events (AEs) with random-effect models after searching databases. Reports of AEs were retrospectively obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and positive signals were quantified by employing three algorithms.

Results: A total of 36 studies involving 10,828 patients were analyzed in pooled-analysis and 58,835 case reports were retrieved. Leukopenia (59.69, 95% confidence interval 41.34-75.69) and neutropenia (29.69, 23.31-36.99) ranked first among all grades and severe AEs, respectively. Alopecia, regardless of grades, had the highest estimated incidence of non-hematological AEs. The estimated incidences of AEs of Nab-paclitaxel tended to be higher than other formulations, especially neutropenia (46.53, 35.01-58.42). Docetaxel had the least signals but alopecia and depression have quantified several signals.

Conclusions: The safety of nab-paclitaxel was beyond expectation and unusual signals of alopecia and depression of docetaxel need to be paid attention to. Results of clinical trials and FAERS indicated consistency between premarket and postmarket studies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信