Why Aren't Antenatal Care Providers Adopting Oral Health Guidelines? A Qualitative Exploration.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Annika Wilson, Cailin Davies, Silvana Bettiol, Heather Bridgman, Leonard Crocombe, Ha Hoang
{"title":"Why Aren't Antenatal Care Providers Adopting Oral Health Guidelines? A Qualitative Exploration.","authors":"Annika Wilson, Cailin Davies, Silvana Bettiol, Heather Bridgman, Leonard Crocombe, Ha Hoang","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current Australian Pregnancy Care guidelines recommend that antenatal care providers discuss oral health, provide advice and refer women to dental professionals as needed. However, the delivery of oral health recommendations in antenatal settings appears substandard. This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers influencing antenatal care providers' adoption of the oral health guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of antenatal care providers in Tasmania, Australia. Data analysis followed a thematic coding method using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework to identify implementation barriers and enablers and to inform recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five antenatal care providers participated (midwives n = 14, general practitioners n = 10 and obstetrician-gynaecologist n = 1). Thirty-two explanatory themes were identified and mapped directly to six COM-B constructs and 11 Theoretical Domains Framework domains. Eight main themes were identified as both impeding and enabling when viewed in different contexts: (1) perceived patient knowledge and awareness; (2) professional oral health knowledge, training and skills; (3) awareness of the guidelines on oral health; (4) patient education and professional resources; (5) interprofessional collaboration and support; (6) streamlined referral processes and access to dental services; (7) perceived outcomes of oral health interventions; and (8) perceived professional responsibility related to oral health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Key strategies include improvements to the promotion and dissemination of relevant guidelines, professional education and training, and development and adoption of oral health-centred models of care to support interprofessional collaboration. Future research should focus on developing brief and sustainable interventions that address antenatal care providers' practice behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current Australian Pregnancy Care guidelines recommend that antenatal care providers discuss oral health, provide advice and refer women to dental professionals as needed. However, the delivery of oral health recommendations in antenatal settings appears substandard. This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers influencing antenatal care providers' adoption of the oral health guidelines.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of antenatal care providers in Tasmania, Australia. Data analysis followed a thematic coding method using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework to identify implementation barriers and enablers and to inform recommendations.

Results: Twenty-five antenatal care providers participated (midwives n = 14, general practitioners n = 10 and obstetrician-gynaecologist n = 1). Thirty-two explanatory themes were identified and mapped directly to six COM-B constructs and 11 Theoretical Domains Framework domains. Eight main themes were identified as both impeding and enabling when viewed in different contexts: (1) perceived patient knowledge and awareness; (2) professional oral health knowledge, training and skills; (3) awareness of the guidelines on oral health; (4) patient education and professional resources; (5) interprofessional collaboration and support; (6) streamlined referral processes and access to dental services; (7) perceived outcomes of oral health interventions; and (8) perceived professional responsibility related to oral health.

Conclusions: Key strategies include improvements to the promotion and dissemination of relevant guidelines, professional education and training, and development and adoption of oral health-centred models of care to support interprofessional collaboration. Future research should focus on developing brief and sustainable interventions that address antenatal care providers' practice behaviours.

为什么产前保健提供者不采用口腔健康指南?质的探索。
目的:目前的澳大利亚怀孕护理指南建议产前护理提供者讨论口腔健康,提供建议,并根据需要将妇女转介给牙科专业人员。然而,在产前环境中提供的口腔健康建议似乎不合格。本研究旨在确定影响产前保健提供者采用口腔健康指南的障碍和促进因素。方法:一项定性研究进行了半结构化访谈与目的样本的产前保健提供者在塔斯马尼亚州,澳大利亚。数据分析遵循主题编码方法,使用能力、机会、动机-行为(COM-B)模型和理论领域框架来识别实施障碍和推动因素,并为建议提供信息。结果:共有25名产前保健提供者参与调查(助产士14名,全科医生10名,妇产科医生1名)。确定了32个解释性主题,并将其直接映射到6个COM-B结构和11个理论领域框架领域。在不同的背景下,八个主要主题被确定为既阻碍又促进:(1)感知患者的知识和意识;(2)专业的口腔卫生知识、培训和技能;(3)对口腔健康指南的了解程度;(4)患者教育和专业资源;(5)跨专业协作与支持;(6)简化转介程序和提供牙科服务;(7)口腔健康干预措施的感知结果;(8)与口腔健康相关的职业责任感知。结论:关键战略包括改进相关指南的宣传和传播、专业教育和培训,以及制定和采用以口腔健康为中心的护理模式,以支持专业间合作。未来的研究应侧重于发展简短和可持续的干预措施,以解决产前保健提供者的实践行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信