Using Propensity Score Subclassification to Estimate the Population-Average Causal Effect of Temporomandibular Dysfunction Experience on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Australian Adults.
Kamal Hanna, Ninuk Hariyani, Gloria Mejia, Lisa Jamieson, David S Brennan
{"title":"Using Propensity Score Subclassification to Estimate the Population-Average Causal Effect of Temporomandibular Dysfunction Experience on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Australian Adults.","authors":"Kamal Hanna, Ninuk Hariyani, Gloria Mejia, Lisa Jamieson, David S Brennan","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) experience might impair oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Causal inference using population-based cross-sectional data is challenging given the potential for bias. Propensity Score Subclassification (PS-Subclassification) provides a tool to mitigate confounding bias. The aim of this study was to estimate the Population-Average Treatment Effect (PATE) of having TMD experience among Australian adults on OHRQoL using PS-Subclassification and statistically estimated Minimally Important Differences (MID-S).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH) 2004-06 data were used which included a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview, mailed questionnaire and oral epidemiological examination. Data included demographics, socioeconomics, caries experience (DMFT index), periodontitis, TMD experience using the TMD Diagnostic Criteria Question, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and perceived stress. Analysis steps included: (1) generating propensity scores (PS) for TMD experience probability using causal model-derived confounders while incorporating survey design elements; (2) PS-Subclassification and weighting; (3) assessing common support and group balance and (4) estimating the PATE for TMD experience on OHIP-14 overall and domains scores using complex samples GLM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4063 NSAOH participants, 397 with TMD and 3656 without TMD were included in PS-Subclassification (all data were used) and shared common support for their PS and established adequate covariate balance (SMD < 0.2). Experiencing TMD had higher OHIP-14 total scores (B = 3.498, 95% CI: 2.218-4.778) with a small MID-S (Cohen's F<sup>2</sup> = 0.03). TMD experience impaired all OHIP-14 domains (p < 0.05) with physical pain and psychological domains among the highest impaired OHIP-14 domains with a small MID-S.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMD experience impaired the overall OHRQoL measured by the OHIP-14 among Australian adults with a small MID-S. Physical pain and psychological domains were among the highest impaired OHRQoL domains with a small MID-S. Clinicians and policymakers might consider these findings to support TMD screening and patient-centred management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) experience might impair oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Causal inference using population-based cross-sectional data is challenging given the potential for bias. Propensity Score Subclassification (PS-Subclassification) provides a tool to mitigate confounding bias. The aim of this study was to estimate the Population-Average Treatment Effect (PATE) of having TMD experience among Australian adults on OHRQoL using PS-Subclassification and statistically estimated Minimally Important Differences (MID-S).
Method: Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH) 2004-06 data were used which included a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview, mailed questionnaire and oral epidemiological examination. Data included demographics, socioeconomics, caries experience (DMFT index), periodontitis, TMD experience using the TMD Diagnostic Criteria Question, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and perceived stress. Analysis steps included: (1) generating propensity scores (PS) for TMD experience probability using causal model-derived confounders while incorporating survey design elements; (2) PS-Subclassification and weighting; (3) assessing common support and group balance and (4) estimating the PATE for TMD experience on OHIP-14 overall and domains scores using complex samples GLM.
Results: Of the 4063 NSAOH participants, 397 with TMD and 3656 without TMD were included in PS-Subclassification (all data were used) and shared common support for their PS and established adequate covariate balance (SMD < 0.2). Experiencing TMD had higher OHIP-14 total scores (B = 3.498, 95% CI: 2.218-4.778) with a small MID-S (Cohen's F2 = 0.03). TMD experience impaired all OHIP-14 domains (p < 0.05) with physical pain and psychological domains among the highest impaired OHIP-14 domains with a small MID-S.
Conclusion: TMD experience impaired the overall OHRQoL measured by the OHIP-14 among Australian adults with a small MID-S. Physical pain and psychological domains were among the highest impaired OHRQoL domains with a small MID-S. Clinicians and policymakers might consider these findings to support TMD screening and patient-centred management.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome.
The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry.
The journal is published bimonthly.