Using Propensity Score Subclassification to Estimate the Population-Average Causal Effect of Temporomandibular Dysfunction Experience on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Australian Adults.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kamal Hanna, Ninuk Hariyani, Gloria Mejia, Lisa Jamieson, David S Brennan
{"title":"Using Propensity Score Subclassification to Estimate the Population-Average Causal Effect of Temporomandibular Dysfunction Experience on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Australian Adults.","authors":"Kamal Hanna, Ninuk Hariyani, Gloria Mejia, Lisa Jamieson, David S Brennan","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) experience might impair oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Causal inference using population-based cross-sectional data is challenging given the potential for bias. Propensity Score Subclassification (PS-Subclassification) provides a tool to mitigate confounding bias. The aim of this study was to estimate the Population-Average Treatment Effect (PATE) of having TMD experience among Australian adults on OHRQoL using PS-Subclassification and statistically estimated Minimally Important Differences (MID-S).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH) 2004-06 data were used which included a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview, mailed questionnaire and oral epidemiological examination. Data included demographics, socioeconomics, caries experience (DMFT index), periodontitis, TMD experience using the TMD Diagnostic Criteria Question, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and perceived stress. Analysis steps included: (1) generating propensity scores (PS) for TMD experience probability using causal model-derived confounders while incorporating survey design elements; (2) PS-Subclassification and weighting; (3) assessing common support and group balance and (4) estimating the PATE for TMD experience on OHIP-14 overall and domains scores using complex samples GLM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4063 NSAOH participants, 397 with TMD and 3656 without TMD were included in PS-Subclassification (all data were used) and shared common support for their PS and established adequate covariate balance (SMD < 0.2). Experiencing TMD had higher OHIP-14 total scores (B = 3.498, 95% CI: 2.218-4.778) with a small MID-S (Cohen's F<sup>2</sup> = 0.03). TMD experience impaired all OHIP-14 domains (p < 0.05) with physical pain and psychological domains among the highest impaired OHIP-14 domains with a small MID-S.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMD experience impaired the overall OHRQoL measured by the OHIP-14 among Australian adults with a small MID-S. Physical pain and psychological domains were among the highest impaired OHRQoL domains with a small MID-S. Clinicians and policymakers might consider these findings to support TMD screening and patient-centred management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) experience might impair oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Causal inference using population-based cross-sectional data is challenging given the potential for bias. Propensity Score Subclassification (PS-Subclassification) provides a tool to mitigate confounding bias. The aim of this study was to estimate the Population-Average Treatment Effect (PATE) of having TMD experience among Australian adults on OHRQoL using PS-Subclassification and statistically estimated Minimally Important Differences (MID-S).

Method: Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH) 2004-06 data were used which included a Computer Assisted Telephone Interview, mailed questionnaire and oral epidemiological examination. Data included demographics, socioeconomics, caries experience (DMFT index), periodontitis, TMD experience using the TMD Diagnostic Criteria Question, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and perceived stress. Analysis steps included: (1) generating propensity scores (PS) for TMD experience probability using causal model-derived confounders while incorporating survey design elements; (2) PS-Subclassification and weighting; (3) assessing common support and group balance and (4) estimating the PATE for TMD experience on OHIP-14 overall and domains scores using complex samples GLM.

Results: Of the 4063 NSAOH participants, 397 with TMD and 3656 without TMD were included in PS-Subclassification (all data were used) and shared common support for their PS and established adequate covariate balance (SMD < 0.2). Experiencing TMD had higher OHIP-14 total scores (B = 3.498, 95% CI: 2.218-4.778) with a small MID-S (Cohen's F2 = 0.03). TMD experience impaired all OHIP-14 domains (p < 0.05) with physical pain and psychological domains among the highest impaired OHIP-14 domains with a small MID-S.

Conclusion: TMD experience impaired the overall OHRQoL measured by the OHIP-14 among Australian adults with a small MID-S. Physical pain and psychological domains were among the highest impaired OHRQoL domains with a small MID-S. Clinicians and policymakers might consider these findings to support TMD screening and patient-centred management.

使用倾向评分亚分类估计澳大利亚成年人颞下颌功能障碍经历对口腔健康相关生活质量的人口平均因果效应。
背景:颞下颌功能障碍(TMD)经历可能会损害口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)。考虑到潜在的偏差,使用基于人群的横断面数据进行因果推断是具有挑战性的。倾向评分子分类(PS-Subclassification)提供了一种减轻混杂偏差的工具。本研究的目的是使用ps亚分类和统计估计的最小重要差异(MID-S)来估计澳大利亚成年人中有TMD经历的人群平均治疗效果(PATE)。方法:采用2004- 2006年澳大利亚全国成人口腔健康调查(NSAOH)资料,包括计算机辅助电话访谈、邮寄问卷和口腔流行病学检查。数据包括人口统计学、社会经济学、龋病经历(DMFT指数)、牙周炎、使用TMD诊断标准问题的TMD经历、口腔健康影响概况(OHIP-14)和感知压力。分析步骤包括:(1)结合调查设计元素,利用因果模型衍生的混杂因素生成TMD经验概率的倾向得分(PS);(2) ps -分级及权重;(3)评估共同支持和群体平衡;(4)使用复杂样本GLM估计TMD经验在OHIP-14总体和领域得分上的PATE。结果:在4063名NSAOH参与者中,397名TMD患者和3656名非TMD患者被纳入PS亚分类(所有数据均被使用),并对他们的PS有共同的支持,并建立了足够的协变量平衡(SMD 2 = 0.03)。结论:TMD经历损害了OHIP-14的所有域(p)。结论:TMD经历损害了OHIP-14测量的总体OHRQoL。生理疼痛和心理领域是OHRQoL受损程度最高的领域,具有较小的MID-S。临床医生和决策者可能会考虑这些发现来支持TMD筛查和以患者为中心的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信