A Comparison of Inpatient Versus Ambulatory Lumbar Surgical Care Utilization Among Minority Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Justin Tiao, Husni Alasadi, Michael M Herrera, Nicole Zubizarreta, Jonathan Huang, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary
{"title":"A Comparison of Inpatient Versus Ambulatory Lumbar Surgical Care Utilization Among Minority Patients.","authors":"Justin Tiao, Husni Alasadi, Michael M Herrera, Nicole Zubizarreta, Jonathan Huang, Jashvant Poeran, Saad Chaudhary","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify and compare racial/ethnic disparities in ambulatory versus inpatient surgical care utilization for single-level lumbar spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The proportion of spine surgeries performed in the ambulatory setting has dramatically increased over the past 2 decades. However, few studies have investigated whether this shift has resulted in racial/ethnic disparities in surgical care utilization, particularly for outpatient lumbar spine surgery, compared with the inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Utilizing the 2019 National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgical Sample discharge, we included patients who had undergone a single-level lumbar discectomy, laminectomy, and/or fusion, were of Black, White, or Hispanic race/ethnicity, were covered under Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance, and were aged 18 years or above. The primary outcome was the rate ratio (RR) of patients from the aforementioned 3 racial/ethnic groups undergoing lumbar surgical care, in the ambulatory and inpatient settings. US Bureau of Labor Statistics data were utilized to offset the model for population-based variations in sociodemographic factors utilizing nested coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 397,173 cases, 220,250 (55.5%) were inpatient, and 176,923 (44.5%) were ambulatory. Compared with White patients, Black (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53-0.55) and Hispanic (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) patients had lower utilization rates of ambulatory surgical care. More pronounced patterns were observed for Black (RR: 0.44 95% CI: 0.44-0.45) and Hispanic (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.54-0.56) inpatient surgical utilization; all P < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial/ethic disparities in single-level lumbar surgical care utilization exist in both the ambulatory and the inpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Identify and compare racial/ethnic disparities in ambulatory versus inpatient surgical care utilization for single-level lumbar spine surgery.

Summary of background data: The proportion of spine surgeries performed in the ambulatory setting has dramatically increased over the past 2 decades. However, few studies have investigated whether this shift has resulted in racial/ethnic disparities in surgical care utilization, particularly for outpatient lumbar spine surgery, compared with the inpatient setting.

Materials and methods: Utilizing the 2019 National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgical Sample discharge, we included patients who had undergone a single-level lumbar discectomy, laminectomy, and/or fusion, were of Black, White, or Hispanic race/ethnicity, were covered under Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance, and were aged 18 years or above. The primary outcome was the rate ratio (RR) of patients from the aforementioned 3 racial/ethnic groups undergoing lumbar surgical care, in the ambulatory and inpatient settings. US Bureau of Labor Statistics data were utilized to offset the model for population-based variations in sociodemographic factors utilizing nested coefficients.

Results: Among 397,173 cases, 220,250 (55.5%) were inpatient, and 176,923 (44.5%) were ambulatory. Compared with White patients, Black (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53-0.55) and Hispanic (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) patients had lower utilization rates of ambulatory surgical care. More pronounced patterns were observed for Black (RR: 0.44 95% CI: 0.44-0.45) and Hispanic (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.54-0.56) inpatient surgical utilization; all P < 0.001.

Conclusions: Racial/ethic disparities in single-level lumbar surgical care utilization exist in both the ambulatory and the inpatient setting.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

少数民族患者住院与门诊腰椎外科护理利用的比较。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:确定和比较单节段腰椎手术中门诊和住院手术护理利用的种族/民族差异。背景资料摘要:在过去的二十年中,在门诊环境中进行的脊柱手术的比例急剧增加。然而,很少有研究调查这种转变是否导致了手术护理利用的种族/民族差异,特别是对于门诊腰椎手术,与住院情况相比。材料和方法:利用2019年全国住院患者样本和全国门诊手术样本出院,我们纳入了接受过单节段腰椎间盘切除术、椎板切除术和/或融合手术的患者,他们是黑人、白人或西班牙裔,享受医疗保险、医疗补助或私人保险,年龄在18岁或以上。主要结局是上述3个种族/民族患者在门诊和住院环境中接受腰椎手术护理的比率(RR)。利用嵌套系数,利用美国劳工统计局的数据来抵消基于人口的社会人口因素变化模型。结果:397173例患者中,住院220250例(55.5%),门诊176923例(44.5%)。与白人患者相比,黑人(RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53-0.55)和西班牙裔(RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62)患者的门诊手术护理利用率较低。黑人(RR: 0.44 95% CI: 0.44-0.45)和西班牙裔(RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.54-0.56)住院患者的手术利用模式更为明显;均P < 0.001。结论:无论在门诊还是住院,单节段腰椎外科护理的种族/民族差异都存在。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信