{"title":"Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Linger Sim, Norasnieda Md Shukri, Najib Majdi Yaacob, Chenthilnathan Periasamy, Musat Gabriela Cornelia, Baharudin Abdullah","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2468970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) primarily displays type 2 inflammation, characterized by the activation of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the pathway. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of dupilumab (an IL-4 antagonist) in treating CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. All published English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that employed dupilumab to treat CRSwNP in adult patients (≥18 years old) were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs and 25 studies with 784 individuals were included. The use of dupilumab revealed improvement in polyp size (MD -1.80; 95% CI -2.25 to -1.36), Lund-Mackay score (MD -7.01, 95% CI -9.64 to -4.38), congestion (MD -0.86, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.73), smell (MD 10.83, 95% CI 9.59 to 12.08) and health-related quality of life (MD -19.61, 95% CI -22.53 to -16.69). Systemic corticosteroid use (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.39) and revision surgery (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.52) were reduced. Serious adverse events were reduced in dupilumab group (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76) with no change in risk of adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dupilumab is effective with minimal adverse events.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023413004.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2468970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) primarily displays type 2 inflammation, characterized by the activation of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the pathway. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of dupilumab (an IL-4 antagonist) in treating CRSwNP.
Methods: A detailed search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. All published English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that employed dupilumab to treat CRSwNP in adult patients (≥18 years old) were considered.
Results: Three RCTs and 25 studies with 784 individuals were included. The use of dupilumab revealed improvement in polyp size (MD -1.80; 95% CI -2.25 to -1.36), Lund-Mackay score (MD -7.01, 95% CI -9.64 to -4.38), congestion (MD -0.86, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.73), smell (MD 10.83, 95% CI 9.59 to 12.08) and health-related quality of life (MD -19.61, 95% CI -22.53 to -16.69). Systemic corticosteroid use (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.39) and revision surgery (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.52) were reduced. Serious adverse events were reduced in dupilumab group (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76) with no change in risk of adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.11).
Conclusions: Dupilumab is effective with minimal adverse events.
Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023413004.
期刊介绍:
Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery.
Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.