Impact of educational videos and user guide on indwelling pleural catheter caregiver training and unplanned healthcare encounters.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Si Ling Young, Brian Lee Wei Chua, Qiao Li Tan, Carrie Kah-Lai Leong, Ivana Gilcrist Chiew Sian Phua, Jane Jing Yi Wong, Wen Ting Lim, Kendra Jing Ying Tang, Aaron Jun Jie Tan, Fena Ming Qin Lee, Ken Junyang Goh
{"title":"Impact of educational videos and user guide on indwelling pleural catheter caregiver training and unplanned healthcare encounters.","authors":"Si Ling Young, Brian Lee Wei Chua, Qiao Li Tan, Carrie Kah-Lai Leong, Ivana Gilcrist Chiew Sian Phua, Jane Jing Yi Wong, Wen Ting Lim, Kendra Jing Ying Tang, Aaron Jun Jie Tan, Fena Ming Qin Lee, Ken Junyang Goh","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are an effective first line option for the management of symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. However, patients with IPCs often require unplanned healthcare encounters (UHEs) due to complications or concerns with IPC care and drainage.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>There is a lack of readily accessible IPC-specific educational material to support caregiver training (CGT). As IPC care and drainage are performed primarily by patients and caregivers in our country due to the lack of community nursing support, ineffective CGT may lead to increased UHEs due to caregiver knowledge gaps or poor confidence in managing and caring for IPCs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aim to reduce the number of IPC-related UHEs.</p><p><strong>Methods and interventions: </strong>We used a 5-why diagram and identified a lack of appropriate educational material as a key factor contributing to repeated UHEs. We therefore produced and employed IPC-specific educational videos and user guides, using a 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' approach, into our CGT programme. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively for 166 consecutive patients with IPC insertions, with 72 patients in the preintervention group and 94 in the postintervention group. Survey questionnaires addressing caregiver competency and confidence were also administered after CGT using these tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients who had ≥2 (8.5% vs 40.9%, p<0.001) or ≥3 UHEs (3.2% vs 31.8%, p<0.001) in the intervention group. There was also a higher caregiver competency score achieved in the intervention group (7 (IQR: 7-7) vs 5 (IQR: 5-7), p<0.001). There was no difference in overall complication and IPC-related infection rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPC-specific educational videos and resources, which are readily accessible and easily implemented into CGT programmes, reduce UHEs due to IPC-related issues and may improve caregiver knowledge and competency in IPC care and drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) are an effective first line option for the management of symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. However, patients with IPCs often require unplanned healthcare encounters (UHEs) due to complications or concerns with IPC care and drainage.

Local problem: There is a lack of readily accessible IPC-specific educational material to support caregiver training (CGT). As IPC care and drainage are performed primarily by patients and caregivers in our country due to the lack of community nursing support, ineffective CGT may lead to increased UHEs due to caregiver knowledge gaps or poor confidence in managing and caring for IPCs.

Aims: We aim to reduce the number of IPC-related UHEs.

Methods and interventions: We used a 5-why diagram and identified a lack of appropriate educational material as a key factor contributing to repeated UHEs. We therefore produced and employed IPC-specific educational videos and user guides, using a 'Plan-Do-Study-Act' approach, into our CGT programme. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively for 166 consecutive patients with IPC insertions, with 72 patients in the preintervention group and 94 in the postintervention group. Survey questionnaires addressing caregiver competency and confidence were also administered after CGT using these tools.

Results: There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients who had ≥2 (8.5% vs 40.9%, p<0.001) or ≥3 UHEs (3.2% vs 31.8%, p<0.001) in the intervention group. There was also a higher caregiver competency score achieved in the intervention group (7 (IQR: 7-7) vs 5 (IQR: 5-7), p<0.001). There was no difference in overall complication and IPC-related infection rates between groups.

Conclusion: IPC-specific educational videos and resources, which are readily accessible and easily implemented into CGT programmes, reduce UHEs due to IPC-related issues and may improve caregiver knowledge and competency in IPC care and drainage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信