Artificial intelligence model for perigastric blood vessel recognition during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae158
Guanjian Chen, Yequan Xie, Bin Yang, JiaNan Tan, Guangyu Zhong, Lin Zhong, Shengning Zhou, Fanghai Han
{"title":"Artificial intelligence model for perigastric blood vessel recognition during laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in locally advanced gastric cancer.","authors":"Guanjian Chen, Yequan Xie, Bin Yang, JiaNan Tan, Guangyu Zhong, Lin Zhong, Shengning Zhou, Fanghai Han","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is standard surgical protocol for locally advanced gastric cancer. The surgical experience and skill in recognizing blood vessels and performing lymph node dissection differ between surgeons, which may influence intraoperative safety and postoperative oncological outcomes. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop an accurate and real-time deep learning-based perigastric blood vessel recognition model to assist intraoperative performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study assessing videos of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The model was developed based on DeepLabv3+. Static performance was evaluated using precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score. Dynamic performance was verified using 15 intraoperative videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 2460 images captured from 116 videos. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the artery were 0.9442(0.0059), 0.9099(0.0163), 0.8635(0.0146), and 0.9267(0.0084) respectively. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the vein were 0.9349(0.0064), 0.8491(0.0259), 0.8015(0.0206), and 0.8897(0.0127) respectively. The model also performed well in recognizing perigastric blood vessels in 15 dynamic test videos. Intersection over union and F1 score in difficult image conditions, such as bleeding or massive surgical smoke in the field of view, were reduced, while images from obese patients resulted in satisfactory vessel recognition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model recognized the perigastric blood vessels with satisfactory predictive value in the test set and performed well in the dynamic videos. It therefore shows promise with regard to increasing safety and decreasing accidental bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is standard surgical protocol for locally advanced gastric cancer. The surgical experience and skill in recognizing blood vessels and performing lymph node dissection differ between surgeons, which may influence intraoperative safety and postoperative oncological outcomes. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop an accurate and real-time deep learning-based perigastric blood vessel recognition model to assist intraoperative performance.

Methods: This was a retrospective study assessing videos of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The model was developed based on DeepLabv3+. Static performance was evaluated using precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score. Dynamic performance was verified using 15 intraoperative videos.

Results: The study involved 2460 images captured from 116 videos. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the artery were 0.9442(0.0059), 0.9099(0.0163), 0.8635(0.0146), and 0.9267(0.0084) respectively. Mean(s.d.) precision, recall, intersection over union, and F1 score for the vein were 0.9349(0.0064), 0.8491(0.0259), 0.8015(0.0206), and 0.8897(0.0127) respectively. The model also performed well in recognizing perigastric blood vessels in 15 dynamic test videos. Intersection over union and F1 score in difficult image conditions, such as bleeding or massive surgical smoke in the field of view, were reduced, while images from obese patients resulted in satisfactory vessel recognition.

Conclusion: The model recognized the perigastric blood vessels with satisfactory predictive value in the test set and performed well in the dynamic videos. It therefore shows promise with regard to increasing safety and decreasing accidental bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy.

局部进展期胃癌腹腔镜胃癌根治术伴D2淋巴结切除术胃周血管识别的人工智能模型
背景:根治性胃切除术联合D2淋巴结切除术是局部进展期胃癌的标准手术方案。外科医生在血管识别和淋巴结清扫方面的手术经验和技能不同,这可能会影响术中安全性和术后肿瘤预后。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种准确、实时的基于深度学习的胃周血管识别模型,以辅助术中表现。方法:回顾性分析腹腔镜胃根治术合并D2淋巴结切除术的影像。模型是基于DeepLabv3+开发的。静态性能评估使用精度,召回率,交集超过联合,和F1得分。通过15个术中视频验证动态性能。结果:该研究涉及从116个视频中捕获的2460张图像。动脉的平均(s.d)精密度、查全率、交叉/结合和F1评分分别为0.9442(0.0059)、0.9099(0.0163)、0.8635(0.0146)和0.9267(0.0084)。静脉的平均精密度(s.d)、召回率(recall)、相交/结合(intersection over union)和F1评分分别为0.9349(0.0064)、0.8491(0.0259)、0.8015(0.0206)和0.8897(0.0127)。在15个动态测试视频中,该模型对胃周血管的识别也表现良好。在困难的图像条件下,如视野内出血或大量手术烟雾,交叉愈合和F1评分降低,而肥胖患者的图像则产生令人满意的血管识别。结论:该模型在测试集中对胃周血管的识别具有满意的预测价值,在动态视频中表现良好。因此,在腹腔镜胃切除术中增加安全性和减少意外出血方面显示出希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信