Fidelity of the Guided Self-Determination program in the MyHealth study during breast cancer follow-up.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sigrid N Biener, Beverley L Høeg, Lena Saltbæk, Susanne O Dalton, Christoffer Johansen, Randi V Karlsen, Federica Belmonte, Vibeke Zoffmann, Pernille E Bidstrup
{"title":"Fidelity of the Guided Self-Determination program in the MyHealth study during breast cancer follow-up.","authors":"Sigrid N Biener, Beverley L Høeg, Lena Saltbæk, Susanne O Dalton, Christoffer Johansen, Randi V Karlsen, Federica Belmonte, Vibeke Zoffmann, Pernille E Bidstrup","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>MyHealth is a new follow-up program including individual nurse-led sessions based on Guided Self-Determination (GSD), which has been shown to improve health and psychological outcomes in patients after treatment for breast cancer. Fidelity assessment is important to support the implementation of GSD in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate fidelity and acceptance of the GSD program in the MyHealth study and whether sociodemographic and psychological factors were associated with patients' completion of the GSD program and completion of reflection sheets.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed fidelity quantitatively by examining patients' completion of the GSD program (i.e. ≥3 sessions), completion of the reflection sheets and their associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors among 239 patients, and nurse-reported acceptance qualitatively through a focus group interview with all five nurses providing the GSD program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81% of patients completed the GSD program, while 71% of the reflection sheets were completed. Including a relative in a GSD session and lower education were significantly associated with completion of the program. Younger age and including a relative in a GSD session were significantly associated with completion of reflection sheets. Nurses found GSD highly applicable and especially appreciated a values-clarifying GSD reflection sheet and the inclusion of a relative.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The GSD program was applied with moderate-to-high fidelity, and the inclusion of relatives is potentially valuable. The GSD program indicates high usability and potential for being translated into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"284-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: MyHealth is a new follow-up program including individual nurse-led sessions based on Guided Self-Determination (GSD), which has been shown to improve health and psychological outcomes in patients after treatment for breast cancer. Fidelity assessment is important to support the implementation of GSD in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate fidelity and acceptance of the GSD program in the MyHealth study and whether sociodemographic and psychological factors were associated with patients' completion of the GSD program and completion of reflection sheets.

Material and methods: We assessed fidelity quantitatively by examining patients' completion of the GSD program (i.e. ≥3 sessions), completion of the reflection sheets and their associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors among 239 patients, and nurse-reported acceptance qualitatively through a focus group interview with all five nurses providing the GSD program.

Results: A total of 81% of patients completed the GSD program, while 71% of the reflection sheets were completed. Including a relative in a GSD session and lower education were significantly associated with completion of the program. Younger age and including a relative in a GSD session were significantly associated with completion of reflection sheets. Nurses found GSD highly applicable and especially appreciated a values-clarifying GSD reflection sheet and the inclusion of a relative.

Interpretation: The GSD program was applied with moderate-to-high fidelity, and the inclusion of relatives is potentially valuable. The GSD program indicates high usability and potential for being translated into clinical practice.

在乳腺癌随访期间,“我的健康”研究中指导自决计划的保真度。
背景和目的:MyHealth是一个新的随访项目,包括基于指导自决(GSD)的护士主导的个体会议,该项目已被证明可以改善乳腺癌治疗后患者的健康和心理结果。保真度评估对于支持GSD在临床实践中的实施具有重要意义。因此,本研究的目的是调查MyHealth研究中GSD计划的忠实度和接受度,以及社会人口统计学和心理因素是否与患者完成GSD计划和完成反思表有关。材料和方法:我们通过对239名患者GSD计划的完成情况(即≥3次)、反思表的完成情况及其与社会人口学和心理因素的关联进行定量评估,并通过对所有5名提供GSD计划的护士进行焦点小组访谈,对护士报告的接受程度进行定性评估。结果:共有81%的患者完成了GSD程序,71%的患者完成了反思单。在GSD课程中包括一个亲戚和较低的教育程度与项目的完成程度显著相关。年龄较小和在GSD会议中包括亲属与完成反思表显着相关。护士发现GSD非常适用,特别赞赏明确价值观的GSD反映表和包含亲属。解释:GSD程序具有中高保真度,包含亲属具有潜在的价值。GSD程序表明高可用性和潜力被转化为临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信