Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/bco2.502
Hayder Alhusseinawi, Naomi Nadler, Helene Reif Andersen, Juan Luis Vásquez, Thomas Norus, Nessn Azawi
{"title":"Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink","authors":"Hayder Alhusseinawi,&nbsp;Naomi Nadler,&nbsp;Helene Reif Andersen,&nbsp;Juan Luis Vásquez,&nbsp;Thomas Norus,&nbsp;Nessn Azawi","doi":"10.1002/bco2.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (<i>p</i> = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.

Patients and Methods

In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Results

Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, p < 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (p = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信