Exploring the roles of L1 reading, L2 proficiency, strategy use and anxiety in L2 Reading comprehension

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Aiping Zhao, Xuening Zhang, Ying Guo, Megan Schneider Dinnesen, Shuyan Sun, Yunqing Xu
{"title":"Exploring the roles of L1 reading, L2 proficiency, strategy use and anxiety in L2 Reading comprehension","authors":"Aiping Zhao,&nbsp;Xuening Zhang,&nbsp;Ying Guo,&nbsp;Megan Schneider Dinnesen,&nbsp;Shuyan Sun,&nbsp;Yunqing Xu","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Second language (L2) reading is a complex process in which two languages constantly interact. L1 reading and L2 proficiency are two well-acknowledged factors contributing to L2 reading comprehension. Other factors, such as strategy use and anxiety, might also predict L2 reading comprehension, but their roles have not been examined in the presence of L1 reading and L2 proficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 147 high school Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) learners (mean age = 17.8, <i>SD</i> = 0.48). They were assessed on their L2 reading comprehension, L1 reading comprehension, L2 proficiency (L2 vocabulary and L2 syntactic knowledge), strategy use and reading anxiety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Hierarchical regression model analyses showed that L1 reading significantly contributed to L2 reading comprehension in the presence of L2 proficiency. Strategy use and anxiety were significant predictors of L2 reading comprehension in the presence of L1 reading and L2 proficiency. Together, they accounted for 53% of the variance in L2 reading comprehension. L2 proficiency moderated the relations between L1 and L2 reading comprehension and strategy use and L2 reading comprehension but not the relation between anxiety and L2 reading comprehension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Besides the well-acknowledged L1 reading and L2 proficiency, strategy use and anxiety were also significant predictors of L2 reading comprehension, stressing the importance of these cognitive and affective factors in L2 reading. By revealing the moderating role of L2 proficiency, these findings deepen our understanding of the nature of the relations between L1 and L2 reading comprehension, strategy use and L2 reading comprehension.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"48 1","pages":"100-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Second language (L2) reading is a complex process in which two languages constantly interact. L1 reading and L2 proficiency are two well-acknowledged factors contributing to L2 reading comprehension. Other factors, such as strategy use and anxiety, might also predict L2 reading comprehension, but their roles have not been examined in the presence of L1 reading and L2 proficiency.

Method

Participants were 147 high school Chinese English as a foreign language (EFL) learners (mean age = 17.8, SD = 0.48). They were assessed on their L2 reading comprehension, L1 reading comprehension, L2 proficiency (L2 vocabulary and L2 syntactic knowledge), strategy use and reading anxiety.

Results

Hierarchical regression model analyses showed that L1 reading significantly contributed to L2 reading comprehension in the presence of L2 proficiency. Strategy use and anxiety were significant predictors of L2 reading comprehension in the presence of L1 reading and L2 proficiency. Together, they accounted for 53% of the variance in L2 reading comprehension. L2 proficiency moderated the relations between L1 and L2 reading comprehension and strategy use and L2 reading comprehension but not the relation between anxiety and L2 reading comprehension.

Conclusions

Besides the well-acknowledged L1 reading and L2 proficiency, strategy use and anxiety were also significant predictors of L2 reading comprehension, stressing the importance of these cognitive and affective factors in L2 reading. By revealing the moderating role of L2 proficiency, these findings deepen our understanding of the nature of the relations between L1 and L2 reading comprehension, strategy use and L2 reading comprehension.

探讨母语阅读、二语熟练程度、策略使用和焦虑在二语阅读理解中的作用
第二语言阅读是一个复杂的过程,是两种语言不断相互作用的过程。母语阅读和二语熟练程度是促进二语阅读理解的两个公认的因素。其他因素,如策略使用和焦虑,也可能预测二语阅读理解,但它们的作用尚未在存在母语阅读和二语熟练程度的情况下进行研究。方法研究对象为147名高中中国英语学习者(平均年龄= 17.8,SD = 0.48)。评估他们的二语阅读理解、二语阅读理解、二语熟练程度(二语词汇和二语句法知识)、策略使用和阅读焦虑。结果层次回归模型分析显示,母语阅读对二语阅读理解有显著的促进作用。策略使用和焦虑是二语阅读理解和二语熟练程度的显著预测因子。他们合计占第二语言阅读理解差异的53%。二语熟练程度调节了二语阅读理解、策略使用和二语阅读理解之间的关系,但对焦虑和二语阅读理解之间的关系没有调节作用。结论除了公认的母语阅读和二语熟练程度外,策略使用和焦虑也是二语阅读理解的显著预测因素,强调了这些认知和情感因素在二语阅读中的重要性。通过揭示二语熟练程度的调节作用,这些发现加深了我们对母语和二语阅读理解、策略使用和二语阅读理解之间关系本质的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信