Analysis of ECMO usage in trauma patients at a major level 1 trauma center

Q4 Medicine
April Miller , Megan Post , Crescens Pellecchia , John Bini
{"title":"Analysis of ECMO usage in trauma patients at a major level 1 trauma center","authors":"April Miller ,&nbsp;Megan Post ,&nbsp;Crescens Pellecchia ,&nbsp;John Bini","doi":"10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for decades in patients where adequate oxygenation could not be achieved using traditional efforts. Data is emerging regarding its use in trauma. Retrospective data was collected from the ECMO database at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion data was age &gt; 17 years, trauma, and ECMO utilization during admission. Outcomes extracted included patient demographics, mechanism and type of injury, type of ECMO, ECMO days, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care LOS, date of injury to ECMO time, P/F ratio, ISS, complications, co-morbidities, anticoagulation, and mortality. Of the included 24 patients, 23 received veno-venous (VV) ECMO and one veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. The overall group demographics were: <em>n</em> = 23 males vs. <em>n</em> = 1 female, age 38.6 (±16.1) years. Duration of ECMO was 8.38 (±7.0) days, inpatient LOS 32.67 (±19.3) days, ICU LOS 26.33 (±18.0) days, DOI to initiation of ECMO 6.25 (±7.8). The ISS average was 29. The most common injury noted was rib fractures, average 4.6 (0−13) per patient. Other injuries included pneumothoraces (50 %), hemothoraces (35 %), blunt cardiac/sternal fracture (33 %). Complications on ECMO included transfusion requirement (54 %), DVT (13 %), and DIC (8 %). Of those studied, 87.5 % survived ECMO, with 70.8 % surviving to discharge. When using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, there was not a statistically significant difference when comparing ISS, age, or P/F ratio between survivors versus non-survivors. Future research with increased sample size will be invaluable for the continued understanding of the role of ECMO in trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23291,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Case Reports","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for decades in patients where adequate oxygenation could not be achieved using traditional efforts. Data is emerging regarding its use in trauma. Retrospective data was collected from the ECMO database at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion data was age > 17 years, trauma, and ECMO utilization during admission. Outcomes extracted included patient demographics, mechanism and type of injury, type of ECMO, ECMO days, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care LOS, date of injury to ECMO time, P/F ratio, ISS, complications, co-morbidities, anticoagulation, and mortality. Of the included 24 patients, 23 received veno-venous (VV) ECMO and one veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. The overall group demographics were: n = 23 males vs. n = 1 female, age 38.6 (±16.1) years. Duration of ECMO was 8.38 (±7.0) days, inpatient LOS 32.67 (±19.3) days, ICU LOS 26.33 (±18.0) days, DOI to initiation of ECMO 6.25 (±7.8). The ISS average was 29. The most common injury noted was rib fractures, average 4.6 (0−13) per patient. Other injuries included pneumothoraces (50 %), hemothoraces (35 %), blunt cardiac/sternal fracture (33 %). Complications on ECMO included transfusion requirement (54 %), DVT (13 %), and DIC (8 %). Of those studied, 87.5 % survived ECMO, with 70.8 % surviving to discharge. When using Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests, there was not a statistically significant difference when comparing ISS, age, or P/F ratio between survivors versus non-survivors. Future research with increased sample size will be invaluable for the continued understanding of the role of ECMO in trauma.
某大型一级创伤中心创伤患者ECMO使用分析
体外膜氧合(ECMO)用于传统方法无法获得充分氧合的患者已有数十年的历史。有关其在创伤中的应用的数据正在出现。回顾性数据从2020年至2024年期间城市一级创伤中心的ECMO数据库中收集。纳入数据为年龄>;17岁,外伤,入院时使用ECMO。提取的结果包括患者人口统计学、损伤机制和类型、ECMO类型、ECMO天数、住院时间(LOS)、重症监护时间(LOS)、损伤日期至ECMO时间、P/F比、ISS、并发症、合并症、抗凝和死亡率。在24例患者中,23例接受静脉-静脉(VV) ECMO, 1例接受静脉-动脉(VA) ECMO。总体人群统计数据为:男性23例,女性1例,年龄38.6(±16.1)岁。ECMO持续时间8.38(±7.0)天,住院LOS 32.67(±19.3)天,ICU LOS 26.33(±18.0)天,至ECMO启动DOI 6.25(±7.8)天。国际空间站的平均年龄是29岁。最常见的损伤是肋骨骨折,平均4.6例(0 - 13例)。其他损伤包括气胸(50%)、血胸(35%)、钝性心脏/胸骨骨折(33%)。ECMO的并发症包括输血(54%)、DVT(13%)和DIC(8%)。在研究中,87.5%的患者存活于ECMO, 70.8%存活至出院。当使用Mann-Whitney U和卡方检验时,在比较幸存者与非幸存者之间的ISS、年龄或P/F比率时,没有统计学上的显著差异。随着样本量的增加,未来的研究对于继续了解ECMO在创伤中的作用将是非常宝贵的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma Case Reports
Trauma Case Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Trauma Case Reports is the only open access, online journal dedicated to the publication of case reports in all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Case reports on all aspects of trauma management, surgical procedures for all tissues, resuscitation, anaesthesia and trauma and tissue healing will be considered for publication by the international editorial team and will be subject to peer review. Bringing together these cases from an international authorship will shed light on surgical problems and help in their effective resolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信