Psychosocial-cultural care for couples experiencing infertility: An integrative review

Q2 Nursing
Anthony Kolsabilik Kuug , Sindiwe James , Jardien-Baboo Sihaam
{"title":"Psychosocial-cultural care for couples experiencing infertility: An integrative review","authors":"Anthony Kolsabilik Kuug ,&nbsp;Sindiwe James ,&nbsp;Jardien-Baboo Sihaam","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Infertility remains a major reproductive health issue across the globe which often leads to a myriad of psychosocial concerns. For societies where childbearing is considered a social prestige, the emergence of infertility can be devastating to affected persons and their families. Management strategies for infertility are still evolving albeit what remains poorly articulated is the guidelines to underpin the provision of culturally sensitive psychosocial care. To resolve this gap, this review sought to identify and integrate existing literature to formulate a conceptual understanding of culturally sensitive psychosocial care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span>Whittemore and Knafl’s, 2009</span></span> integrative review approach was employed and reported based on the PRISMA checklist. A systematic search using relevant key terms or keywords for all relevant guidelines was carried out in relevant electronic databases, namely BioMed Central, Science Direct, CINAHL, Medline, Sabinet, Academic Search Ultimate, Nursing/Academic Edition, Emerald, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar. The guideline databases that were searched included: the Guideline International Network (G-I-N); the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); and the National Guideline Clearing House (NGCH). Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the extracted data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six (6) studies including three (3) systematic reviews of infertility care and three (3) guidelines for infertility management met the criteria for inclusion. Two themes and five subthemes emerged from the extracted data which encapsulate the need for patient-centered care and the availability of psychological, emotional, and social support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review concludes that healthcare providers need to adopt infertility interventions that are culturally sensitive and very supportive based on the provision of effective and efficient information and communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139125000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infertility remains a major reproductive health issue across the globe which often leads to a myriad of psychosocial concerns. For societies where childbearing is considered a social prestige, the emergence of infertility can be devastating to affected persons and their families. Management strategies for infertility are still evolving albeit what remains poorly articulated is the guidelines to underpin the provision of culturally sensitive psychosocial care. To resolve this gap, this review sought to identify and integrate existing literature to formulate a conceptual understanding of culturally sensitive psychosocial care.

Methods

Whittemore and Knafl’s, 2009 integrative review approach was employed and reported based on the PRISMA checklist. A systematic search using relevant key terms or keywords for all relevant guidelines was carried out in relevant electronic databases, namely BioMed Central, Science Direct, CINAHL, Medline, Sabinet, Academic Search Ultimate, Nursing/Academic Edition, Emerald, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar. The guideline databases that were searched included: the Guideline International Network (G-I-N); the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); and the National Guideline Clearing House (NGCH). Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the extracted data.

Results

Six (6) studies including three (3) systematic reviews of infertility care and three (3) guidelines for infertility management met the criteria for inclusion. Two themes and five subthemes emerged from the extracted data which encapsulate the need for patient-centered care and the availability of psychological, emotional, and social support.

Conclusions

The review concludes that healthcare providers need to adopt infertility interventions that are culturally sensitive and very supportive based on the provision of effective and efficient information and communication.
为不孕不育夫妇提供心理社会文化关怀:综合评论
在全球范围内,生育问题仍然是一个主要的生殖健康问题,它往往导致无数的社会心理问题。在把生育视为一种社会声望的社会中,不孕症的出现对受影响的人及其家庭可能是毁灭性的。不孕症的管理策略仍在不断发展,尽管仍然缺乏明确的指导方针,以支持提供具有文化敏感性的社会心理护理。为了解决这一差距,本综述试图识别和整合现有文献,以形成对文化敏感的社会心理护理的概念性理解。方法采用whittemore和Knafl的2009年综合评价方法,并根据PRISMA检查表进行报告。在相关电子数据库(BioMed Central、Science Direct、CINAHL、Medline、Sabinet、Academic search Ultimate、Nursing/Academic Edition、Emerald、PubMed Central和谷歌Scholar)中使用相关关键词或关键词对所有相关指南进行系统检索。检索的指南数据库包括:指南国际网络(G-I-N);国家健康和临床卓越研究所(NICE);以及国家指导信息交换所(NGCH)。采用主题分析法对提取的数据进行分析。结果6项研究包括3项不孕症治疗的系统综述和3项不孕症治疗指南符合纳入标准。从提取的数据中出现了两个主题和五个副主题,这些主题概括了以患者为中心的护理需求以及心理、情感和社会支持的可用性。结论:在提供有效和高效的信息和沟通的基础上,医疗保健提供者需要采取具有文化敏感性和非常支持性的不孕不育干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信