The utility of inpatient work-up of incidental anemia during hospitalization for an acute medical condition: A retrospective cohort study.

Genady Drozdinsky, Erez Halperin, Shiri Kushnir, Yaron Rudman, Anat Gafter-Gvili
{"title":"The utility of inpatient work-up of incidental anemia during hospitalization for an acute medical condition: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Genady Drozdinsky, Erez Halperin, Shiri Kushnir, Yaron Rudman, Anat Gafter-Gvili","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The best timing for evaluation of anemia is not well defined and the clinical yield of performing workup during non-anemia-related hospitalization is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inpatient laboratory anemia evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study between the years 2013-2022 in Rabin Medical Center Israel. We included all patients admitted for non-anemia-related reasons and were found to be anemic. Patients were divided into groups based on basic laboratory anemia evaluation. Outcomes were cancer diagnosis, colonoscopy rate, duration of admission, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable analysis with competing risk of death was performed and a p-value of 5 % was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following matching, 4,238 patients were included in the evaluation group compared to 7,680 in the no-evaluation group. In-patient laboratory anemia evaluation was associated with gastrointestinal cancer and any cancer diagnosis - HR of 1.53 (95 % CI, 1.15- 2.05) and HR of 1.23 (95 % CI, 1.11-1.37) respectively. The rate of colonoscopy was higher, and anemia prevalence was lower in the evaluation group after 1-year follow-up. Intravenous iron treatment was more prevalent in the evaluation group. The laboratory anemia evaluation prolonged the admission (5 vs 4 days). There was no difference in the all-cause mortality across the 10-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inpatient anemia evaluation with basic laboratory tests was found to be associated with an increase in outpatient gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and showed clinical and diagnostic advantages. For patients who can benefit from early gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis, admission holds a valid opportunity to initiate the evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The best timing for evaluation of anemia is not well defined and the clinical yield of performing workup during non-anemia-related hospitalization is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inpatient laboratory anemia evaluation.

Methods: This was a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study between the years 2013-2022 in Rabin Medical Center Israel. We included all patients admitted for non-anemia-related reasons and were found to be anemic. Patients were divided into groups based on basic laboratory anemia evaluation. Outcomes were cancer diagnosis, colonoscopy rate, duration of admission, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable analysis with competing risk of death was performed and a p-value of 5 % was considered significant.

Results: Following matching, 4,238 patients were included in the evaluation group compared to 7,680 in the no-evaluation group. In-patient laboratory anemia evaluation was associated with gastrointestinal cancer and any cancer diagnosis - HR of 1.53 (95 % CI, 1.15- 2.05) and HR of 1.23 (95 % CI, 1.11-1.37) respectively. The rate of colonoscopy was higher, and anemia prevalence was lower in the evaluation group after 1-year follow-up. Intravenous iron treatment was more prevalent in the evaluation group. The laboratory anemia evaluation prolonged the admission (5 vs 4 days). There was no difference in the all-cause mortality across the 10-year follow-up.

Conclusion: Inpatient anemia evaluation with basic laboratory tests was found to be associated with an increase in outpatient gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and showed clinical and diagnostic advantages. For patients who can benefit from early gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis, admission holds a valid opportunity to initiate the evaluation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信