Dual Approach for Basilar Artery Fenestration Aneurysm With Insights From Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Neurosurgery practice Pub Date : 2024-11-11 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000122
Rafael T Tatit, Vincenzo T R Loly, Rabih G Tawk, Johnny S Sandhu, Lucas O C Guida, Jorge Rios-Zermeno, João S B Lima, Carlos E Baccin
{"title":"Dual Approach for Basilar Artery Fenestration Aneurysm With Insights From Computational Fluid Dynamics.","authors":"Rafael T Tatit, Vincenzo T R Loly, Rabih G Tawk, Johnny S Sandhu, Lucas O C Guida, Jorge Rios-Zermeno, João S B Lima, Carlos E Baccin","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Basilar artery fenestration aneurysms (BAFAs) present significant clinical challenges because of their high rupture risk and complex anatomy. Comprehensive management strategies are required, including thorough vascular assessment and post-treatment surveillance. Integration of complementary analyses such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) holds promise in facilitating preoperative planning for these intricate lesions.</p><p><strong>Clinical presentation: </strong>A 60-year-old female was diagnosed with a BAFA during evaluation for headaches. Digital subtraction angiography revealed the aneurysm projecting posteriorly with a neck predominantly based on the right limb of the fenestration. After initial treatment with a pipeline embolization device, the aneurysm remained patent, requiring further treatment. A secondary approach with stent-assisted loose-packing coil embolization was then performed, resulting in complete occlusion of the aneurysm. Analysis of pretreatment 3-dimensional rotational angiogram images with CFD provided critical hemodynamic insights. It identified that 38.89% of the aneurysm area was exposed to low wall shear stress (WSS) and 11.5% was exposed to high WSS, indicating a high rupture risk profile with significant areas of both low and high WSS. In addition, low WSS was observed in regions corresponding to daughter sacs, suggesting a higher rupture risk. Streamline analysis indicated increased inflow through the right vertebral artery and the right limb of the fenestration, supporting the initial angiographic impression and guiding the choice of therapeutic strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to analyze the morphology and pretreatment hemodynamics of a BAFA using CFD, illustrating the potential for future development of individualized therapeutic approach-based CFD in complex aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"5 4","pages":"e00122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance: Basilar artery fenestration aneurysms (BAFAs) present significant clinical challenges because of their high rupture risk and complex anatomy. Comprehensive management strategies are required, including thorough vascular assessment and post-treatment surveillance. Integration of complementary analyses such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) holds promise in facilitating preoperative planning for these intricate lesions.

Clinical presentation: A 60-year-old female was diagnosed with a BAFA during evaluation for headaches. Digital subtraction angiography revealed the aneurysm projecting posteriorly with a neck predominantly based on the right limb of the fenestration. After initial treatment with a pipeline embolization device, the aneurysm remained patent, requiring further treatment. A secondary approach with stent-assisted loose-packing coil embolization was then performed, resulting in complete occlusion of the aneurysm. Analysis of pretreatment 3-dimensional rotational angiogram images with CFD provided critical hemodynamic insights. It identified that 38.89% of the aneurysm area was exposed to low wall shear stress (WSS) and 11.5% was exposed to high WSS, indicating a high rupture risk profile with significant areas of both low and high WSS. In addition, low WSS was observed in regions corresponding to daughter sacs, suggesting a higher rupture risk. Streamline analysis indicated increased inflow through the right vertebral artery and the right limb of the fenestration, supporting the initial angiographic impression and guiding the choice of therapeutic strategy.

Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze the morphology and pretreatment hemodynamics of a BAFA using CFD, illustrating the potential for future development of individualized therapeutic approach-based CFD in complex aneurysms.

基于计算流体动力学的基底动脉开窗动脉瘤双入路治疗。
背景和重要性:基底动脉开窗动脉瘤(basar artery fenestration动脉瘤,BAFAs)因其高破裂风险和复杂的解剖结构而面临着重大的临床挑战。需要全面的管理策略,包括彻底的血管评估和治疗后监测。计算流体动力学(CFD)等互补分析的集成有望促进这些复杂病变的术前规划。临床表现:一位60岁的女性在评估头痛时被诊断为BAFA。数字减影血管造影显示动脉瘤后突出,颈部主要位于开窗右侧肢体。在用管道栓塞装置进行初步治疗后,动脉瘤仍未愈合,需要进一步治疗。然后进行支架辅助松散填充线圈栓塞的二次入路,导致动脉瘤完全闭塞。用CFD分析预处理的三维旋转血管造影图像提供了关键的血流动力学见解。研究发现,38.89%的动脉瘤区域暴露在低壁剪切应力(WSS)下,11.5%的动脉瘤区域暴露在高壁剪切应力下,这表明动脉瘤破裂的风险很高,低壁剪切应力和高壁剪切应力的区域都很明显。此外,在子囊对应的区域观察到低WSS,提示较高的破裂风险。流线分析显示通过右侧椎动脉和开窗右侧肢体的血流增加,支持最初的血管造影印象,指导治疗策略的选择。结论:这是第一个使用CFD分析BAFA形态和预处理血流动力学的研究,说明了基于CFD的复杂动脉瘤个体化治疗方法的未来发展潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信