Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Andrew B Koo, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Joseph P Antonios, Daniela Renedo, Joseph O Haynes, Bushra Fathima, Brianna C Theriault, Miguel M Chavez, Abdelaziz Amllay, Kamil W Nowicki, Matthew Kanzler, Jasmine W Jiang, Apurv H Shekar, Ryan M Hebert, Michael L DiLuna, Charles C Matouk
{"title":"Lumbocaval Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Technical Report and Case Series.","authors":"Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Andrew B Koo, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Joseph P Antonios, Daniela Renedo, Joseph O Haynes, Bushra Fathima, Brianna C Theriault, Miguel M Chavez, Abdelaziz Amllay, Kamil W Nowicki, Matthew Kanzler, Jasmine W Jiang, Apurv H Shekar, Ryan M Hebert, Michael L DiLuna, Charles C Matouk","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neurosurgical management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) can be challenging given high rates of revision associated with cerebrospinal fluid shunting. In this study, we present a technical report and early outcomes for lumbocaval shunt (LCS) placement in difficult-to-manage cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed for previous reports of LCS or lumboatrial shunt. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent placement of LCS for the treatment of IIH at a single institution were reviewed. Based on early experience and outcomes, our modified technique for LCS is described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients (4 females, median age 36 years [IQR 31-43]) underwent placement of LCS between October 2023 and April 2024. LCS was completed in all cases without intraoperative complications. The median operative time was 88.5 minutes [IQR 79.5-158.8]. One patient developed low-pressure headaches that resolved after the addition of a shunt-assist device. Five of 6 patients reported improved headache at the last follow-up visit, with 4 of 5 patients reporting that their high-pressure headaches completely resolved (median time to the last follow-up of one month [IQR 1-2 months]). During the study period, one shunt revision was performed because of migration of the lumbar shunt into a suprafascial pocket. This led to modification of the surgical technique, specifically the inclusion of anchoring dips.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LCS may represent an alternative shunting technique in difficult-to-manage patients with IIH. Further assessment of long-term outcomes is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"5 4","pages":"e00113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Neurosurgical management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) can be challenging given high rates of revision associated with cerebrospinal fluid shunting. In this study, we present a technical report and early outcomes for lumbocaval shunt (LCS) placement in difficult-to-manage cases.
Methods: A literature search was performed for previous reports of LCS or lumboatrial shunt. Electronic medical records of patients who underwent placement of LCS for the treatment of IIH at a single institution were reviewed. Based on early experience and outcomes, our modified technique for LCS is described.
Results: Six patients (4 females, median age 36 years [IQR 31-43]) underwent placement of LCS between October 2023 and April 2024. LCS was completed in all cases without intraoperative complications. The median operative time was 88.5 minutes [IQR 79.5-158.8]. One patient developed low-pressure headaches that resolved after the addition of a shunt-assist device. Five of 6 patients reported improved headache at the last follow-up visit, with 4 of 5 patients reporting that their high-pressure headaches completely resolved (median time to the last follow-up of one month [IQR 1-2 months]). During the study period, one shunt revision was performed because of migration of the lumbar shunt into a suprafascial pocket. This led to modification of the surgical technique, specifically the inclusion of anchoring dips.
Conclusion: LCS may represent an alternative shunting technique in difficult-to-manage patients with IIH. Further assessment of long-term outcomes is needed.