Electrophysiological parameters in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Dragoş Lupu, Cristian Stănescu, Dănuţ Laurenţiu Nedelcu, George Alin Stoica, Mihai Marius Botezat, Andreea Ştefania Lupu
{"title":"Electrophysiological parameters in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.","authors":"Dragoş Lupu, Cristian Stănescu, Dănuţ Laurenţiu Nedelcu, George Alin Stoica, Mihai Marius Botezat, Andreea Ştefania Lupu","doi":"10.47162/RJME.65.4.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various electrophysiological abnormalities are noted in patients with cirrhosis, the most prevalent consisting of QT prolongation and autonomic dysfunction. This study aims to thoroughly evaluate these abnormalities in cirrhotic patients by utilizing various parameters and compare them with healthy individuals. We evaluated 60 patients with hepatic cirrhosis using a resting electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG during and after the Valsalva maneuver, 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and a standardized ECG stress test. We then compared these results with a group of 50 patients who had no hepatic cirrhosis or other significant known pathologies and were not on any medical treatment. At rest, cirrhotic patients had a reduced Valsalva index compared to the control group, but no statistical differences were noted in comparing resting heart rate (HR) values. At Holter monitoring, although there was a trend toward increased corrected QT (QTc) intervals in cirrhotic patients, it did not reach statistical significance, indicating no difference between the two groups. Reduced standard deviation of normal-to-normal (NN) intervals (SDNN) values, statistically significant, were noted in cirrhotic patients compared to the control group, indicating autonomic dysfunction. At stress test, there was no statistically significant difference in the results obtained for maximum HR during exercise between the two groups. Also, the results showed that cirrhotic patients had statistically significantly higher HR values after exercise compared to the control group. In conclusion, cirrhotic patients presented an increased grade of autonomic dysfunction compared to healthy patients, but no differences were noted regarding QT interval abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54447,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology","volume":"65 4","pages":"687-692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47162/RJME.65.4.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various electrophysiological abnormalities are noted in patients with cirrhosis, the most prevalent consisting of QT prolongation and autonomic dysfunction. This study aims to thoroughly evaluate these abnormalities in cirrhotic patients by utilizing various parameters and compare them with healthy individuals. We evaluated 60 patients with hepatic cirrhosis using a resting electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG during and after the Valsalva maneuver, 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and a standardized ECG stress test. We then compared these results with a group of 50 patients who had no hepatic cirrhosis or other significant known pathologies and were not on any medical treatment. At rest, cirrhotic patients had a reduced Valsalva index compared to the control group, but no statistical differences were noted in comparing resting heart rate (HR) values. At Holter monitoring, although there was a trend toward increased corrected QT (QTc) intervals in cirrhotic patients, it did not reach statistical significance, indicating no difference between the two groups. Reduced standard deviation of normal-to-normal (NN) intervals (SDNN) values, statistically significant, were noted in cirrhotic patients compared to the control group, indicating autonomic dysfunction. At stress test, there was no statistically significant difference in the results obtained for maximum HR during exercise between the two groups. Also, the results showed that cirrhotic patients had statistically significantly higher HR values after exercise compared to the control group. In conclusion, cirrhotic patients presented an increased grade of autonomic dysfunction compared to healthy patients, but no differences were noted regarding QT interval abnormalities.

肝硬化患者的电生理参数。
肝硬化患者有多种电生理异常,最常见的是QT间期延长和自主神经功能障碍。本研究旨在利用各种参数全面评估肝硬化患者的这些异常,并将其与健康个体进行比较。我们使用静息心电图(ECG)、Valsalva操作期间和之后的心电图、24小时动态心电图监测和标准化心电图压力测试对60例肝硬化患者进行了评估。然后,我们将这些结果与一组50名没有肝硬化或其他重大已知病理且未接受任何药物治疗的患者进行比较。在静息时,肝硬化患者的Valsalva指数低于对照组,但在比较静息心率(HR)值时没有统计学差异。在动态心电图监测中,虽然肝硬化患者校正QT间期有增加的趋势,但没有达到统计学意义,说明两组间无差异。与对照组相比,肝硬化患者正常到正常(NN)间隔(SDNN)值的标准差降低,具有统计学意义,表明自主神经功能障碍。在压力测试中,两组在运动时最大HR的结果无统计学差异。此外,结果显示,肝硬化患者运动后HR值高于对照组,具有统计学意义。总之,与健康患者相比,肝硬化患者出现自主神经功能障碍的程度增加,但QT间期异常没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology (Rom J Morphol Embryol) publishes studies on all aspects of normal morphology and human comparative and experimental pathology. The Journal accepts only researches that utilize modern investigation methods (studies of anatomy, pathology, cytopathology, immunohistochemistry, histochemistry, immunology, morphometry, molecular and cellular biology, electronic microscopy, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信