Burnout, collective efficacy and the social network of an intensive care unit.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Amy K Kiefer, David A Shoham, Cara Joyce, Lisa Burkhart
{"title":"Burnout, collective efficacy and the social network of an intensive care unit.","authors":"Amy K Kiefer, David A Shoham, Cara Joyce, Lisa Burkhart","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of burnout among critical care nurses is high. Burnout has been explored at the individual and system levels, with little research occurring at the unit level. Increased social support and self-efficacy are correlated with a decreased risk of burnout at the individual level; however, little is known in how collective efficacy and types of social support are protective against the development of burnout.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Explore the relationships between burnout, collective efficacy and social supports in an intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using a descriptive design, health care professionals working in an intensive care unit (n = 39) were recruited to complete surveys measuring burnout, collective efficacy and four types of social support (emotional, instrumental, informational and advice-seeking). Data were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation and sociograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unit displayed burnout with high levels of emotional exhaustion, moderate levels of depersonalization and high levels of personal accomplishment. The unit had high levels of collective efficacy. Collective efficacy demonstrated a significant and strong negative correlation with emotional exhaustion (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.57, p < .001) and a significant strong positive correlation with personal accomplishment (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.50, p < .005). The advice-seeking network was dense (67%) and advice-seeking social support had a significant negative association with personal accomplishment (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.35, p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrated that burnout develops sequentially from emotional exhaustion to depersonalization to lack of personal accomplishment. Social network analysis methods displayed a deeper understanding of community on a unit than prior quantitative research exploring burnout.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>To decrease burnout, we recommend assessing burnout as a continuum and as a unit-level risk factor. Interventions should be identified that strengthen community on the unit as well as supporting unit leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 2","pages":"e13282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of burnout among critical care nurses is high. Burnout has been explored at the individual and system levels, with little research occurring at the unit level. Increased social support and self-efficacy are correlated with a decreased risk of burnout at the individual level; however, little is known in how collective efficacy and types of social support are protective against the development of burnout.

Aim: Explore the relationships between burnout, collective efficacy and social supports in an intensive care unit.

Study design: Using a descriptive design, health care professionals working in an intensive care unit (n = 39) were recruited to complete surveys measuring burnout, collective efficacy and four types of social support (emotional, instrumental, informational and advice-seeking). Data were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation and sociograms.

Results: The unit displayed burnout with high levels of emotional exhaustion, moderate levels of depersonalization and high levels of personal accomplishment. The unit had high levels of collective efficacy. Collective efficacy demonstrated a significant and strong negative correlation with emotional exhaustion (rs = -0.57, p < .001) and a significant strong positive correlation with personal accomplishment (rs = 0.50, p < .005). The advice-seeking network was dense (67%) and advice-seeking social support had a significant negative association with personal accomplishment (rs = -0.35, p < .01).

Conclusions: The results demonstrated that burnout develops sequentially from emotional exhaustion to depersonalization to lack of personal accomplishment. Social network analysis methods displayed a deeper understanding of community on a unit than prior quantitative research exploring burnout.

Relevance to clinical practice: To decrease burnout, we recommend assessing burnout as a continuum and as a unit-level risk factor. Interventions should be identified that strengthen community on the unit as well as supporting unit leaders.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信