Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation in lower abdominal gynecological surgeries for perioperative gastric volume assessment and assessing postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal functions: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ranjay Mahaseth, Bhavna Gupta, Gaurav Jain, Anupama Bahadur, Deepak Singla, Debendra K Tripathy
{"title":"Proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal intubation in lower abdominal gynecological surgeries for perioperative gastric volume assessment and assessing postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal functions: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ranjay Mahaseth, Bhavna Gupta, Gaurav Jain, Anupama Bahadur, Deepak Singla, Debendra K Tripathy","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_376_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of perioperative care, the concern of gastric content aspiration during surgical procedures is crucial, though relatively rare. Supraglottic devices after the creation of pneumoperitoneum and positive pressure ventilation may cause gastric insufflation. This study explores the unique aspects of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement as a novel indicator in comparing the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation in airway management during lower abdominal surgeries and assessing postoperative recovery in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study commenced after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC number-AIIMS/IEC/22/251 Date: 27/05/2022) and after registration in Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (CTRI/2022/07/044102 Registered on: 18/07/2022) and was conducted from August 2022 to August 2023. A total of 72 ASA I and II participants were included in two groups: endotracheal tube (ETT) (Group E) and PLMA (Group P). The primary outcome was the antral CSA, and secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, time to start clear fluid, light diet, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in antral CSA at various time intervals. The hemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the endotracheal tube group (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The absence of significant differences in time to start clear liquids, time to start a light diet, and time to achieve bowel movements between the ETT and PLMA groups suggested that both airway management techniques are equally safe in facilitating postoperative recovery concerning gastrointestinal functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent minimally invasive lower abdominal surgeries, choice of airway management technique, whether ETT or PLMA, did not substantially impact antral CSA, vital parameters, respiratory parameters, or postoperative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 1","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_376_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the context of perioperative care, the concern of gastric content aspiration during surgical procedures is crucial, though relatively rare. Supraglottic devices after the creation of pneumoperitoneum and positive pressure ventilation may cause gastric insufflation. This study explores the unique aspects of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement as a novel indicator in comparing the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation in airway management during lower abdominal surgeries and assessing postoperative recovery in both the groups.

Methods: The study commenced after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC number-AIIMS/IEC/22/251 Date: 27/05/2022) and after registration in Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) (CTRI/2022/07/044102 Registered on: 18/07/2022) and was conducted from August 2022 to August 2023. A total of 72 ASA I and II participants were included in two groups: endotracheal tube (ETT) (Group E) and PLMA (Group P). The primary outcome was the antral CSA, and secondary outcomes included hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, time to start clear fluid, light diet, and length of stay.

Results: Our results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in antral CSA at various time intervals. The hemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the endotracheal tube group (P < 0.0001). The absence of significant differences in time to start clear liquids, time to start a light diet, and time to achieve bowel movements between the ETT and PLMA groups suggested that both airway management techniques are equally safe in facilitating postoperative recovery concerning gastrointestinal functions.

Conclusions: Patients who underwent minimally invasive lower abdominal surgeries, choice of airway management technique, whether ETT or PLMA, did not substantially impact antral CSA, vital parameters, respiratory parameters, or postoperative recovery.

下腹部妇科手术围手术期胃容量评估及术后胃肠功能恢复评估的预喉罩气道和气管内插管:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在围手术期护理中,手术过程中胃内容物误吸的关注是至关重要的,尽管相对较少。声门上装置产生气腹和正压通气后可能引起胃胀气。本研究探讨了心房横截面积(CSA)测量作为一种新的指标的独特之处,用于比较ProSeal喉罩气道(LMA)和气管内插管在下腹部手术气道管理中的应用,并评估两组患者的术后恢复情况。方法:本研究在获得机构伦理委员会批准(IEC编号:aiims /IEC/22/251日期:27/05/2022)并在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)注册(CTRI/2022/07/044102注册日期:18/07/2022)后开始,于2022年8月至2023年8月进行。ASA I和II期患者共72例,分为两组:气管内插管(ETT)组(E组)和PLMA组(P组)。主要结局是气管内CSA,次要结局包括血流动力学和呼吸参数、开始清液时间、清淡饮食和住院时间。结果:我们的结果显示,两组在不同时间间隔的心房CSA差异无统计学意义。气管插管组血流动力学指标明显增高(P < 0.0001)。ETT组和PLMA组在开始喝清液体的时间、开始清淡饮食的时间和实现排便的时间上没有显著差异,这表明两种气道管理技术在促进胃肠道功能术后恢复方面同样安全。结论:接受微创下腹部手术的患者,气道管理技术的选择,无论是ETT还是PLMA,对窦室CSA、生命参数、呼吸参数或术后恢复没有实质性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信