Erector spinae plane block in Caesarean sections: A scoping review.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kieran Brosnan, Mary Moore, Aisling Ní Eochagáin
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block in Caesarean sections: A scoping review.","authors":"Kieran Brosnan, Mary Moore, Aisling Ní Eochagáin","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_523_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management for Caesarean section focuses on multimodal analgesia with a growing interest in the use of regional techniques. Currently, there is no gold standard peripheral regional analgesia technique for Caesarean section. The Erector Spinae Plane Block is a relatively new fascial plane block that may be used to provide analgesia for numerous surgical procedures of the trunk. In recent years it is the fascial plane block that has accumulated the most enthusiasm and debate. Its use in Caesarean section has grown over the past three years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the scope of literature published on ESPB in Caesarean sections and to identify deficits in the literature to guide future research.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews. This included a search of four databases searching for articles published between 2016 and 2022. Studies involving patients receiving ESPB as part of an analgesic strategy after a Caesarean section were included.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixteen articles were included for final review. The most common primary outcomes measured were postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption. Six ESPB studies recorded a statistically significant reduction in pain scores while three studies described a statistically significant reduction in postoperative analgesia consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of ESPB for Caesarean section is gaining momentum however insufficient evidence currently exists to support its widespread use. Further research is required to evaluate the potential benefits of ESPB in specific patient cohorts and in terms of its efficacy about multidimensional patient-centric outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 1","pages":"77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_523_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management for Caesarean section focuses on multimodal analgesia with a growing interest in the use of regional techniques. Currently, there is no gold standard peripheral regional analgesia technique for Caesarean section. The Erector Spinae Plane Block is a relatively new fascial plane block that may be used to provide analgesia for numerous surgical procedures of the trunk. In recent years it is the fascial plane block that has accumulated the most enthusiasm and debate. Its use in Caesarean section has grown over the past three years.

Objective: To determine the scope of literature published on ESPB in Caesarean sections and to identify deficits in the literature to guide future research.

Methodology: This study was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews. This included a search of four databases searching for articles published between 2016 and 2022. Studies involving patients receiving ESPB as part of an analgesic strategy after a Caesarean section were included.

Findings: Sixteen articles were included for final review. The most common primary outcomes measured were postoperative pain scores and analgesia consumption. Six ESPB studies recorded a statistically significant reduction in pain scores while three studies described a statistically significant reduction in postoperative analgesia consumption.

Conclusion: The use of ESPB for Caesarean section is gaining momentum however insufficient evidence currently exists to support its widespread use. Further research is required to evaluate the potential benefits of ESPB in specific patient cohorts and in terms of its efficacy about multidimensional patient-centric outcomes.

剖宫产术中直立者脊柱平面阻滞:范围回顾。
背景:剖宫产的疼痛管理侧重于多模式镇痛,对区域技术的使用越来越感兴趣。目前,在剖宫产术中还没有金标准的外周区域镇痛技术。竖脊肌平面阻滞是一种相对较新的筋膜平面阻滞,可用于为许多躯干外科手术提供镇痛。近年来,积累了最多热情和争论的是筋膜面阻滞。在过去的三年里,它在剖腹产手术中的使用有所增加。目的:确定剖宫产术中ESPB的文献范围,找出文献中的不足,指导今后的研究。方法:本研究使用Arksey和O'Malley的框架进行范围审查。这包括在四个数据库中搜索2016年至2022年间发表的文章。包括接受ESPB作为剖宫产后镇痛策略一部分的患者的研究。结果:16篇文章被纳入最终审查。最常见的主要结果是术后疼痛评分和镇痛消耗。6项ESPB研究记录了疼痛评分的统计学显著降低,3项研究描述了术后镇痛消耗的统计学显著降低。结论:ESPB在剖宫产术中的应用越来越普遍,但目前尚无足够的证据支持其广泛应用。需要进一步的研究来评估ESPB在特定患者群体中的潜在益处,以及它在多维以患者为中心的结果方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信