Comparison of oxygen supplementation by nasal cannula with suction versus air insufflation without suction under drapes during monitored anesthesia care in adult cataract surgery-A randomized non-inferiority trial.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Subramaniam Shanmugam Arivazhakan, Hemavathi Balachander, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Priya Rudingwa
{"title":"Comparison of oxygen supplementation by nasal cannula with suction versus air insufflation without suction under drapes during monitored anesthesia care in adult cataract surgery-A randomized non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Subramaniam Shanmugam Arivazhakan, Hemavathi Balachander, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Priya Rudingwa","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_312_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with multiple co-morbidities undergoing cataract surgery are at risk of hypoxia and hypercarbia secondary to the rebreathing of the accumulated carbon dioxide under the surgical drapes. They are also at risk of fire accidents due to the hyperoxic condition secondary to oxygen supplementation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main aim of the study was to determine the lowest level of hemoglobin oxygen saturation while providing medical air in comparison with oxygen. Our hypothesis is that providing medical air will be non-inferior to oxygen administration in preventing hypoxia and rebreathing in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in a single center Tertiary care hospital, over a study period of March 2020 to February 2021. Fifty-six adult patients with equal gender distribution undergoing cataract surgery with multiple comorbid conditions without sedative premedications were included in the study and randomized into either Group \"O\" (<i>n</i> = 28) who received oxygen @ 4 l min<sup>-1</sup> through a nasal cannula with suction, and Group \"A\" (<i>n</i> = 28) who received medical air @10 l min<sup>-1</sup> through the circle breathing system under the drapes. The main outcome measured was the lowest hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO<sub>2</sub>), the highest end-tidal carbon dioxide (hETCO<sub>2</sub>), and the highest fraction of inspired carbon dioxide levels (hFiCO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest mean SPO<sub>2</sub> measured was found to be similar between Group O and Group A with 98.8 ± 0.7 and 98.4 ± 0.9 (<i>P</i> = 0.081), respectively. The highest mean ETCO<sub>2</sub> and mean FiCO<sub>2</sub> values were also comparable between the Group O <i>versus</i> Group A with 32.8 ± 2.1 <i>versus</i> 33.3 ± 2.2 (<i>P</i> = 0.464), and 4.5 ± 1.4 <i>versus</i> 4.8 ± 1.8 (<i>P</i> = 0.464) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the supplementation of compressed medical air under surgical drapes is non-inferior to nasal oxygen supplementation under regional anesthesia without causing hypoxia and hypercarbia by conserving valuable hospital resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_312_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with multiple co-morbidities undergoing cataract surgery are at risk of hypoxia and hypercarbia secondary to the rebreathing of the accumulated carbon dioxide under the surgical drapes. They are also at risk of fire accidents due to the hyperoxic condition secondary to oxygen supplementation.

Objectives: The main aim of the study was to determine the lowest level of hemoglobin oxygen saturation while providing medical air in comparison with oxygen. Our hypothesis is that providing medical air will be non-inferior to oxygen administration in preventing hypoxia and rebreathing in these patients.

Methods: This randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in a single center Tertiary care hospital, over a study period of March 2020 to February 2021. Fifty-six adult patients with equal gender distribution undergoing cataract surgery with multiple comorbid conditions without sedative premedications were included in the study and randomized into either Group "O" (n = 28) who received oxygen @ 4 l min-1 through a nasal cannula with suction, and Group "A" (n = 28) who received medical air @10 l min-1 through the circle breathing system under the drapes. The main outcome measured was the lowest hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO2), the highest end-tidal carbon dioxide (hETCO2), and the highest fraction of inspired carbon dioxide levels (hFiCO2).

Results: The lowest mean SPO2 measured was found to be similar between Group O and Group A with 98.8 ± 0.7 and 98.4 ± 0.9 (P = 0.081), respectively. The highest mean ETCO2 and mean FiCO2 values were also comparable between the Group O versus Group A with 32.8 ± 2.1 versus 33.3 ± 2.2 (P = 0.464), and 4.5 ± 1.4 versus 4.8 ± 1.8 (P = 0.464) respectively.

Conclusion: We conclude that the supplementation of compressed medical air under surgical drapes is non-inferior to nasal oxygen supplementation under regional anesthesia without causing hypoxia and hypercarbia by conserving valuable hospital resources.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信