Comparison of oxygen supplementation by nasal cannula with suction versus air insufflation without suction under drapes during monitored anesthesia care in adult cataract surgery-A randomized non-inferiority trial.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Subramaniam Shanmugam Arivazhakan, Hemavathi Balachander, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Priya Rudingwa
{"title":"Comparison of oxygen supplementation by nasal cannula with suction versus air insufflation without suction under drapes during monitored anesthesia care in adult cataract surgery-A randomized non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Subramaniam Shanmugam Arivazhakan, Hemavathi Balachander, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Priya Rudingwa","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_312_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with multiple co-morbidities undergoing cataract surgery are at risk of hypoxia and hypercarbia secondary to the rebreathing of the accumulated carbon dioxide under the surgical drapes. They are also at risk of fire accidents due to the hyperoxic condition secondary to oxygen supplementation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main aim of the study was to determine the lowest level of hemoglobin oxygen saturation while providing medical air in comparison with oxygen. Our hypothesis is that providing medical air will be non-inferior to oxygen administration in preventing hypoxia and rebreathing in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in a single center Tertiary care hospital, over a study period of March 2020 to February 2021. Fifty-six adult patients with equal gender distribution undergoing cataract surgery with multiple comorbid conditions without sedative premedications were included in the study and randomized into either Group \"O\" (<i>n</i> = 28) who received oxygen @ 4 l min<sup>-1</sup> through a nasal cannula with suction, and Group \"A\" (<i>n</i> = 28) who received medical air @10 l min<sup>-1</sup> through the circle breathing system under the drapes. The main outcome measured was the lowest hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO<sub>2</sub>), the highest end-tidal carbon dioxide (hETCO<sub>2</sub>), and the highest fraction of inspired carbon dioxide levels (hFiCO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lowest mean SPO<sub>2</sub> measured was found to be similar between Group O and Group A with 98.8 ± 0.7 and 98.4 ± 0.9 (<i>P</i> = 0.081), respectively. The highest mean ETCO<sub>2</sub> and mean FiCO<sub>2</sub> values were also comparable between the Group O <i>versus</i> Group A with 32.8 ± 2.1 <i>versus</i> 33.3 ± 2.2 (<i>P</i> = 0.464), and 4.5 ± 1.4 <i>versus</i> 4.8 ± 1.8 (<i>P</i> = 0.464) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the supplementation of compressed medical air under surgical drapes is non-inferior to nasal oxygen supplementation under regional anesthesia without causing hypoxia and hypercarbia by conserving valuable hospital resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_312_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with multiple co-morbidities undergoing cataract surgery are at risk of hypoxia and hypercarbia secondary to the rebreathing of the accumulated carbon dioxide under the surgical drapes. They are also at risk of fire accidents due to the hyperoxic condition secondary to oxygen supplementation.

Objectives: The main aim of the study was to determine the lowest level of hemoglobin oxygen saturation while providing medical air in comparison with oxygen. Our hypothesis is that providing medical air will be non-inferior to oxygen administration in preventing hypoxia and rebreathing in these patients.

Methods: This randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in a single center Tertiary care hospital, over a study period of March 2020 to February 2021. Fifty-six adult patients with equal gender distribution undergoing cataract surgery with multiple comorbid conditions without sedative premedications were included in the study and randomized into either Group "O" (n = 28) who received oxygen @ 4 l min-1 through a nasal cannula with suction, and Group "A" (n = 28) who received medical air @10 l min-1 through the circle breathing system under the drapes. The main outcome measured was the lowest hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO2), the highest end-tidal carbon dioxide (hETCO2), and the highest fraction of inspired carbon dioxide levels (hFiCO2).

Results: The lowest mean SPO2 measured was found to be similar between Group O and Group A with 98.8 ± 0.7 and 98.4 ± 0.9 (P = 0.081), respectively. The highest mean ETCO2 and mean FiCO2 values were also comparable between the Group O versus Group A with 32.8 ± 2.1 versus 33.3 ± 2.2 (P = 0.464), and 4.5 ± 1.4 versus 4.8 ± 1.8 (P = 0.464) respectively.

Conclusion: We conclude that the supplementation of compressed medical air under surgical drapes is non-inferior to nasal oxygen supplementation under regional anesthesia without causing hypoxia and hypercarbia by conserving valuable hospital resources.

成人白内障手术麻醉监护过程中鼻插管带吸氧与不带吸氧的帷幕下充气的比较——一项随机非劣效性试验。
背景:接受白内障手术的多重合并症患者有缺氧和高碳血症的风险,继发于手术帷幕下积累的二氧化碳的再呼吸。由于补氧引起的高氧状态,它们也有发生火灾事故的危险。目的:本研究的主要目的是确定在提供医用空气时血红蛋白氧饱和度的最低水平,并与氧气进行比较。我们的假设是,在防止这些患者缺氧和再呼吸方面,提供医用空气的效果不逊于给氧。方法:该随机非劣效性试验于2020年3月至2021年2月在一家单中心三级保健医院进行。研究纳入56例性别平等且伴有多种合并症的白内障手术患者,术前未使用镇静药物,随机分为“O”组(n = 28)和“a”组(n = 28),分别通过带吸力的鼻插管和面罩下循环呼吸系统接受医疗空气(@10 l min-1)。测量的主要结果是最低血红蛋白氧饱和度(SPO2)、最高潮汐末二氧化碳(hETCO2)和最高吸入二氧化碳浓度(hFiCO2)。结果:O组和A组的SPO2平均值比较接近,分别为98.8±0.7和98.4±0.9 (P = 0.081)。最高平均ETCO2和平均FiCO2值在O组和A组之间也具有可比性,分别为32.8±2.1比33.3±2.2 (P = 0.464)和4.5±1.4比4.8±1.8 (P = 0.464)。结论:手术布帘下补充医用压缩空气不逊色于区域麻醉下的鼻供氧,且不会引起缺氧和高碳血症,节约了宝贵的医院资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信