Evaluating the Statistical Fragility of Comparative Studies on Autografts for Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241313472
Gurbinder Singh, Sergei O Alexeev, Patrick Haugh, Ryan T Halvorson, Dean Wang, Nirav K Pandya, Brian T Feeley
{"title":"Evaluating the Statistical Fragility of Comparative Studies on Autografts for Pediatric ACL Reconstruction.","authors":"Gurbinder Singh, Sergei O Alexeev, Patrick Haugh, Ryan T Halvorson, Dean Wang, Nirav K Pandya, Brian T Feeley","doi":"10.1177/23259671241313472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The literature presents conflicting findings regarding outcomes after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with various autograft options, reflecting a lack of consensus on the standard of practice. Fragility analyses may assist in evaluating the statistical robustness of these studies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the statistical fragility of comparative studies in pediatric ACLR through the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ), as well as qualitative factors such as outcome type, outcome significance, and patients lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines identified 1139 studies in the PubMed and Embase databases that met the search criteria; ultimately, 6 studies were selected for inclusion. A total of 32 comparative outcomes were assessed for fragility across the 6 studies. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the fragility data and generate subgroup comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean FI was 1.5, and the mean reverse FI was 3.19 (<i>P</i> < .01); the mean FQ was 0.0064, and the mean reverse FQ was 0.028 (<i>P</i>≤ .0001). No significant difference was found in the FIs between objective outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (<i>P</i> = .418). These findings suggested that a comparable number of patients would need to transition from a nonevent to an event to alter a statistically significant result to a nonsignificant one. The FI was lower than the estimated number of patients lost to follow-up for 30 of the 32 outcomes (93.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparative studies on pediatric ACLR autograft outcomes displayed vulnerability when assessed using fragility metrics, indicating a lack of statistically robust data. The findings revealed that many reported outcomes are fragile and may require further investigation. Future research should incorporate fragility analyses-especially in studies with long-term follow-ups-to enhance the reliability of conclusions regarding optimal graft selection in pediatric ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"23259671241313472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241313472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The literature presents conflicting findings regarding outcomes after pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with various autograft options, reflecting a lack of consensus on the standard of practice. Fragility analyses may assist in evaluating the statistical robustness of these studies.

Purpose: To evaluate the statistical fragility of comparative studies in pediatric ACLR through the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ), as well as qualitative factors such as outcome type, outcome significance, and patients lost to follow-up.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A systematic review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines identified 1139 studies in the PubMed and Embase databases that met the search criteria; ultimately, 6 studies were selected for inclusion. A total of 32 comparative outcomes were assessed for fragility across the 6 studies. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the fragility data and generate subgroup comparisons.

Results: The mean FI was 1.5, and the mean reverse FI was 3.19 (P < .01); the mean FQ was 0.0064, and the mean reverse FQ was 0.028 (P≤ .0001). No significant difference was found in the FIs between objective outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (P = .418). These findings suggested that a comparable number of patients would need to transition from a nonevent to an event to alter a statistically significant result to a nonsignificant one. The FI was lower than the estimated number of patients lost to follow-up for 30 of the 32 outcomes (93.7%).

Conclusion: Comparative studies on pediatric ACLR autograft outcomes displayed vulnerability when assessed using fragility metrics, indicating a lack of statistically robust data. The findings revealed that many reported outcomes are fragile and may require further investigation. Future research should incorporate fragility analyses-especially in studies with long-term follow-ups-to enhance the reliability of conclusions regarding optimal graft selection in pediatric ACLR.

评估儿童前交叉韧带重建自体移植物比较研究的统计脆弱性。
背景:关于儿童前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)和各种自体移植物选择的结果,文献中提出了相互矛盾的发现,反映了对实践标准缺乏共识。脆弱性分析可能有助于评估这些研究的统计稳健性。目的:通过脆弱性指数(FI)和脆弱性商数(FQ),以及结果类型、结果意义、失访患者等定性因素,评价儿科ACLR比较研究的统计脆弱性。研究设计:系统评价;证据等级,4级。方法:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价,确定了PubMed和Embase数据库中符合搜索标准的1139项研究;最终,6项研究入选。6项研究共评估了32项脆弱性比较结果。采用描述性统计对脆弱性数据进行汇总,并进行亚组比较。结果:平均FI为1.5,平均反向FI为3.19 (P < 0.01);平均FQ为0.0064,平均反向FQ为0.028 (P≤0.0001)。客观结果和患者报告的结果在FIs方面无显著差异(P = .418)。这些发现表明,相当数量的患者需要从无事件转变为事件才能将统计上显着的结果改变为不显着的结果。在32个结果中,有30个(93.7%)的FI低于失访患者的估计数量。结论:使用脆弱性指标评估儿童ACLR自体移植物结果时,比较研究显示出易损性,这表明缺乏统计上可靠的数据。研究结果显示,许多报告的结果是脆弱的,可能需要进一步调查。未来的研究应纳入脆弱性分析,特别是在长期随访的研究中,以提高关于儿童ACLR最佳移植物选择的结论的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信