Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fluoroscopy-guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Unilateral L5-S1 Paracentral Discogenic Radicular Pain.

Sathish Muthu, Praveen Thangavel, Sivaraman Duraisamy, Arun Anand Palaniappan
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fluoroscopy-guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Unilateral L5-S1 Paracentral Discogenic Radicular Pain.","authors":"Sathish Muthu, Praveen Thangavel, Sivaraman Duraisamy, Arun Anand Palaniappan","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the key management strategies in the management of discogenic radicular pain. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided ESI through caudal (cESI) and transforaminal (tfESI) routes for unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective non-randomized comparative study conducted between January 2023 and January 2024 in a tertiary care hospital included patients presenting with unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain who failed 6 weeks of conservative care. The pain and functional outcome was analyzed using numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and Oswestry disability index, respectively, at baseline, 3-week, 6-week, and 6-month post-intervention. Procedure failure is defined as NPRS score improvement <50% or ODI improvement <40% of baseline. Other outcomes analyzed were the duration of the procedure, and fluoroscopy shots used during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 60 patients in the study, 54 patients were available till the final follow-up with 26 patients in the cESI group and 28 patients in the tfESI group. The mean age of the cESI group (M: F 12:14) and tfESI group (M:F 10:18) was 36.1 (±4.1) years and 38.9 (±3.9) years, respectively. The pain and functional scores were significantly reduced compared to the baseline scores in both the groups (P < 0.001) and the reduction between the two groups was comparable at every follow-up. The tfESI group experienced significantly more failures (n = 8) at 6 months compared to the cESI group (n = 2) (P = 0.048). The tfESI group had significantly longer mean procedure time (18.8 min) and more fluoroscopy usage (16 shots) compared to cESI group with mean procedure time of 13 min (P = 0.014) and fluoroscopy usage of 10 shots (P = 0.023), respectively. No major adverse events were reported for either of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cESI is a simple, safe, and efficacious technique comparable to tfESI in the management of unilateral L5-S1 paracentral discogenic radicular pain with significantly less procedural time and fluoroscopy usage. Further, large-scale studies are needed to validate the study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the key management strategies in the management of discogenic radicular pain. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided ESI through caudal (cESI) and transforaminal (tfESI) routes for unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain.

Materials and methods: This prospective non-randomized comparative study conducted between January 2023 and January 2024 in a tertiary care hospital included patients presenting with unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain who failed 6 weeks of conservative care. The pain and functional outcome was analyzed using numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and Oswestry disability index, respectively, at baseline, 3-week, 6-week, and 6-month post-intervention. Procedure failure is defined as NPRS score improvement <50% or ODI improvement <40% of baseline. Other outcomes analyzed were the duration of the procedure, and fluoroscopy shots used during the procedure.

Results: We enrolled 60 patients in the study, 54 patients were available till the final follow-up with 26 patients in the cESI group and 28 patients in the tfESI group. The mean age of the cESI group (M: F 12:14) and tfESI group (M:F 10:18) was 36.1 (±4.1) years and 38.9 (±3.9) years, respectively. The pain and functional scores were significantly reduced compared to the baseline scores in both the groups (P < 0.001) and the reduction between the two groups was comparable at every follow-up. The tfESI group experienced significantly more failures (n = 8) at 6 months compared to the cESI group (n = 2) (P = 0.048). The tfESI group had significantly longer mean procedure time (18.8 min) and more fluoroscopy usage (16 shots) compared to cESI group with mean procedure time of 13 min (P = 0.014) and fluoroscopy usage of 10 shots (P = 0.023), respectively. No major adverse events were reported for either of the groups.

Conclusion: cESI is a simple, safe, and efficacious technique comparable to tfESI in the management of unilateral L5-S1 paracentral discogenic radicular pain with significantly less procedural time and fluoroscopy usage. Further, large-scale studies are needed to validate the study results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信