{"title":"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fluoroscopy-guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Unilateral L5-S1 Paracentral Discogenic Radicular Pain.","authors":"Sathish Muthu, Praveen Thangavel, Sivaraman Duraisamy, Arun Anand Palaniappan","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the key management strategies in the management of discogenic radicular pain. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided ESI through caudal (cESI) and transforaminal (tfESI) routes for unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective non-randomized comparative study conducted between January 2023 and January 2024 in a tertiary care hospital included patients presenting with unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain who failed 6 weeks of conservative care. The pain and functional outcome was analyzed using numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and Oswestry disability index, respectively, at baseline, 3-week, 6-week, and 6-month post-intervention. Procedure failure is defined as NPRS score improvement <50% or ODI improvement <40% of baseline. Other outcomes analyzed were the duration of the procedure, and fluoroscopy shots used during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 60 patients in the study, 54 patients were available till the final follow-up with 26 patients in the cESI group and 28 patients in the tfESI group. The mean age of the cESI group (M: F 12:14) and tfESI group (M:F 10:18) was 36.1 (±4.1) years and 38.9 (±3.9) years, respectively. The pain and functional scores were significantly reduced compared to the baseline scores in both the groups (P < 0.001) and the reduction between the two groups was comparable at every follow-up. The tfESI group experienced significantly more failures (n = 8) at 6 months compared to the cESI group (n = 2) (P = 0.048). The tfESI group had significantly longer mean procedure time (18.8 min) and more fluoroscopy usage (16 shots) compared to cESI group with mean procedure time of 13 min (P = 0.014) and fluoroscopy usage of 10 shots (P = 0.023), respectively. No major adverse events were reported for either of the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cESI is a simple, safe, and efficacious technique comparable to tfESI in the management of unilateral L5-S1 paracentral discogenic radicular pain with significantly less procedural time and fluoroscopy usage. Further, large-scale studies are needed to validate the study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 2","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is one of the key management strategies in the management of discogenic radicular pain. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy-guided ESI through caudal (cESI) and transforaminal (tfESI) routes for unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain.
Materials and methods: This prospective non-randomized comparative study conducted between January 2023 and January 2024 in a tertiary care hospital included patients presenting with unilateral paracentral L5-S1 discogenic radicular pain who failed 6 weeks of conservative care. The pain and functional outcome was analyzed using numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and Oswestry disability index, respectively, at baseline, 3-week, 6-week, and 6-month post-intervention. Procedure failure is defined as NPRS score improvement <50% or ODI improvement <40% of baseline. Other outcomes analyzed were the duration of the procedure, and fluoroscopy shots used during the procedure.
Results: We enrolled 60 patients in the study, 54 patients were available till the final follow-up with 26 patients in the cESI group and 28 patients in the tfESI group. The mean age of the cESI group (M: F 12:14) and tfESI group (M:F 10:18) was 36.1 (±4.1) years and 38.9 (±3.9) years, respectively. The pain and functional scores were significantly reduced compared to the baseline scores in both the groups (P < 0.001) and the reduction between the two groups was comparable at every follow-up. The tfESI group experienced significantly more failures (n = 8) at 6 months compared to the cESI group (n = 2) (P = 0.048). The tfESI group had significantly longer mean procedure time (18.8 min) and more fluoroscopy usage (16 shots) compared to cESI group with mean procedure time of 13 min (P = 0.014) and fluoroscopy usage of 10 shots (P = 0.023), respectively. No major adverse events were reported for either of the groups.
Conclusion: cESI is a simple, safe, and efficacious technique comparable to tfESI in the management of unilateral L5-S1 paracentral discogenic radicular pain with significantly less procedural time and fluoroscopy usage. Further, large-scale studies are needed to validate the study results.