Laparoscopic Management of Giant Hydrosalpinx in a Nulliparous Woman.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lijuan Zhao, Yanqing Hao, Songying Zhang
{"title":"Laparoscopic Management of Giant Hydrosalpinx in a Nulliparous Woman.","authors":"Lijuan Zhao, Yanqing Hao, Songying Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A 26-year-old nulliparous woman with lower abdominal pain, mildly elevated inflammatory markers, normal tumor markers and sonographic findings of an 11.9 × 6.1 cm cystic structure in the right adnexa, was treated with antibiotics for suspected hydrosalpinx. Over two years, subsequent ultrasounds demonstrated progressive cystic enlargement (Fig 1), with dimensions of 11.6 × 26 cm on CT imaging. Although her pain was mild, laparoscopic removal was recommended given the size of the pathology, which the patient consented to. At laparoscopy, a giant hydrosalpinx (Figure 2A), torted 3.5 times at the ampullary region (Figure 2B) was noted. Hydrotubation of the left tube demonstrated substantial resistance to flow (Figure 2C). Following fluid aspiration and detorsion of the right fallopian tube, the serosa was incised using bipolar coagulation to expose the lumen. Careful dissection was performed to separate and excise the serosal layer toward the uterine cornua. Non-absorbable sutures were placed at the interstitial-isthmic junction, and both tubes were subsequently resected [1]. Efforts were made to preserve blood supply between the ovaries and fallopian tubes throughout the procedure. Pathology confirmed bilateral chronic salpingitis, with normal Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels. Giant hydrosalpinx is rare and presents substantive diagnostic and management challenges, particularly for young, nulliparous women desiring to conceive. These cystic structures can easily be misdiagnosed as ovarian cysts, making comprehensive imaging essential for accurate diagnosis [2-3]. Although this patient experienced mild symptoms, she developed isolated tubal torsion. Active management of large, persistent, or complex adnexal masses is often warranted and may necessitate surgical intervention. Surgical management focuses on preserving ovarian reserve to improve subsequent birth rates following in vitro fertilization (IVF) [4]. A retrospective clinical study [1] indicates that cornual suturing during salpingectomy may reduce ectopic pregnancy rates from 7.24% to 2.39%. Further validation through randomized controlled trials is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 26-year-old nulliparous woman with lower abdominal pain, mildly elevated inflammatory markers, normal tumor markers and sonographic findings of an 11.9 × 6.1 cm cystic structure in the right adnexa, was treated with antibiotics for suspected hydrosalpinx. Over two years, subsequent ultrasounds demonstrated progressive cystic enlargement (Fig 1), with dimensions of 11.6 × 26 cm on CT imaging. Although her pain was mild, laparoscopic removal was recommended given the size of the pathology, which the patient consented to. At laparoscopy, a giant hydrosalpinx (Figure 2A), torted 3.5 times at the ampullary region (Figure 2B) was noted. Hydrotubation of the left tube demonstrated substantial resistance to flow (Figure 2C). Following fluid aspiration and detorsion of the right fallopian tube, the serosa was incised using bipolar coagulation to expose the lumen. Careful dissection was performed to separate and excise the serosal layer toward the uterine cornua. Non-absorbable sutures were placed at the interstitial-isthmic junction, and both tubes were subsequently resected [1]. Efforts were made to preserve blood supply between the ovaries and fallopian tubes throughout the procedure. Pathology confirmed bilateral chronic salpingitis, with normal Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels. Giant hydrosalpinx is rare and presents substantive diagnostic and management challenges, particularly for young, nulliparous women desiring to conceive. These cystic structures can easily be misdiagnosed as ovarian cysts, making comprehensive imaging essential for accurate diagnosis [2-3]. Although this patient experienced mild symptoms, she developed isolated tubal torsion. Active management of large, persistent, or complex adnexal masses is often warranted and may necessitate surgical intervention. Surgical management focuses on preserving ovarian reserve to improve subsequent birth rates following in vitro fertilization (IVF) [4]. A retrospective clinical study [1] indicates that cornual suturing during salpingectomy may reduce ectopic pregnancy rates from 7.24% to 2.39%. Further validation through randomized controlled trials is necessary.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信