Should limit values be set for infrasound caused by wind turbines?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska, Tadeusz Wszołek, Adam Dudarewicz, Paweł Małecki
{"title":"Should limit values be set for infrasound caused by wind turbines?","authors":"Małgorzata Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska, Tadeusz Wszołek, Adam Dudarewicz, Paweł Małecki","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study focuses on setting outdoor exposure limits for wind turbine infrasound, as most countries currently have no specific limits for this type of noise. A review of the literature on the effects of wind turbine infrasound and the methods used worldwide to measure and assess environmental exposure to infrasound formed the basis for setting limits. According to the literature, human tolerance to infrasound is defined by the hearing threshold, which is not yet standardized. Therefore, a G96 curve (corresponding to tones with the G-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) equal to 96 dB) was used to determine the mean hearing threshold in the 1-20 Hz frequency range. Infrasound that cannot be heard (or felt) is not annoying and does not cause other adverse health effects. The infrasound levels measured around wind farms are well below the hearing threshold. Few countries have set limits for infrasound in either outdoor or indoor environments. The study proposes the G-weighted equivalent SPL as the basis for assessing exposure to infrasound from wind turbines. It also specifies preliminary short-term indices (i.e., G-weighted equivalent SPLs for daytime [L<sub>Geq, D</sub>] and nighttime [L<sub>Geq, N</sub>]) and long-term indices (i.e., averaged G-weighted day-evening-night infrasound level [L<sub>DEN(G)</sub>] and G-weighted night infrasound level [L<sub>N(G)</sub>]). In order to avoid annoyance and other possible harmful effects, regardless of land use, 90 dB was provisionally adopted as an acceptable value for L<sub>Geq, D</sub> and L<sub>DEN(G)</sub>, and 85 dB for L<sub>Geq, N</sub> and L<sub>N(G)</sub>. The study highlights the importance of considering specific exposure limits for wind turbine infrasound to ensure the well-being and comfort of people living near wind turbines. IInt J Occup Med Environ Health. 2025;38(1):3-17.</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":" ","pages":"3-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focuses on setting outdoor exposure limits for wind turbine infrasound, as most countries currently have no specific limits for this type of noise. A review of the literature on the effects of wind turbine infrasound and the methods used worldwide to measure and assess environmental exposure to infrasound formed the basis for setting limits. According to the literature, human tolerance to infrasound is defined by the hearing threshold, which is not yet standardized. Therefore, a G96 curve (corresponding to tones with the G-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) equal to 96 dB) was used to determine the mean hearing threshold in the 1-20 Hz frequency range. Infrasound that cannot be heard (or felt) is not annoying and does not cause other adverse health effects. The infrasound levels measured around wind farms are well below the hearing threshold. Few countries have set limits for infrasound in either outdoor or indoor environments. The study proposes the G-weighted equivalent SPL as the basis for assessing exposure to infrasound from wind turbines. It also specifies preliminary short-term indices (i.e., G-weighted equivalent SPLs for daytime [LGeq, D] and nighttime [LGeq, N]) and long-term indices (i.e., averaged G-weighted day-evening-night infrasound level [LDEN(G)] and G-weighted night infrasound level [LN(G)]). In order to avoid annoyance and other possible harmful effects, regardless of land use, 90 dB was provisionally adopted as an acceptable value for LGeq, D and LDEN(G), and 85 dB for LGeq, N and LN(G). The study highlights the importance of considering specific exposure limits for wind turbine infrasound to ensure the well-being and comfort of people living near wind turbines. IInt J Occup Med Environ Health. 2025;38(1):3-17.

应该为风力涡轮机引起的次声设定限值吗?
这项研究的重点是为风力涡轮机的次声设定室外暴露限制,因为大多数国家目前对这类噪音没有具体的限制。对风力涡轮机次声影响的文献回顾以及世界范围内用于测量和评估环境暴露于次声的方法构成了设定限制的基础。根据文献,人类对次声的容忍度是由听觉阈值来定义的,这个阈值还没有标准化。因此,采用G96曲线(对应于g加权声压级(SPL)为96 dB的音调)来确定1-20 Hz频率范围内的平均听力阈值。听不到(或感觉不到)的次声并不烦人,也不会对健康造成其他不利影响。在风力发电场周围测量的次声水平远低于听力阈值。很少有国家对室外或室内环境中的次声设定了限制。该研究建议将g加权等效声级作为评估风力涡轮机次声暴露的基础。它还规定了初步的短期指标(即白天[LGeq, D]和夜间[LGeq, N]的G加权等效SPLs)和长期指标(即平均G加权日-夜次声水平[LDEN(G)]和G加权夜间次声水平[LN(G)])。为了避免干扰和其他可能的有害影响,无论土地用途如何,LGeq、D和LDEN(G)的可接受值暂时采用90 dB, LGeq、N和LN(G)的可接受值暂时采用85 dB。该研究强调了考虑风力涡轮机次声的特定暴露限制的重要性,以确保居住在风力涡轮机附近的人们的健康和舒适。国际医学与环境卫生杂志,2015;38(1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信