A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of elagolix therapy alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with uterine fibroid associated heavy menstrual bleeding.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-386
Xianying Wang, Jingxin Li, Yang Liu, Yingying Zheng, Xiaoli Wang, Guoqiang Liu
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of elagolix therapy alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with uterine fibroid associated heavy menstrual bleeding.","authors":"Xianying Wang, Jingxin Li, Yang Liu, Yingying Zheng, Xiaoli Wang, Guoqiang Liu","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elagolix is an oral small molecule second-generation nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist drug that can quickly and reversibly inhibit female gonadotropins and ovarian sex hormones. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) caused by uterine fibroids. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy for the treatment of uterine fibroids with HMB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled studies on the application of elagolix alone or with add-back therapy in patients with uterine fibroids and HMB from databases establishment to June 15, 2021. The outcomes reference menstrual blood loss (MBL), amenorrhea, uterine fibroid symptom quality of life (UFS-QoL), hemoglobin level, bone mineral density loss, and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint is MBL. Fixed/random effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR)/mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two studies with four trials involving 1,217 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo, when elagolix was used alone or given with additional therapy, the number of participants who satisfied the MBL was greater (MBL <80 mL and MBL was reduced by more than 50% in the last month), improved hemoglobin levels (increased by more than 2 g/dL from baseline to the final treatment month) criteria as well as triggered amenorrhea. Elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy improved the quality of life of patients. Compared with the elagolix treatment alone or with add-back therapy, the placebo was superior in terms of less bone mineral density change and a lower incidence of AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicated that elagolix alone or in use with add-back therapy can be considered as a satisfactory treatment plan for the majority of patients who are diagnosed with uterine fibroids and HMB; however, the specific treatment plan should also consider patients' physical condition and any adverse reactions to the drug, based on existing research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"60-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elagolix is an oral small molecule second-generation nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist drug that can quickly and reversibly inhibit female gonadotropins and ovarian sex hormones. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy to treat women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) caused by uterine fibroids. Hence, this study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy for the treatment of uterine fibroids with HMB.

Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled studies on the application of elagolix alone or with add-back therapy in patients with uterine fibroids and HMB from databases establishment to June 15, 2021. The outcomes reference menstrual blood loss (MBL), amenorrhea, uterine fibroid symptom quality of life (UFS-QoL), hemoglobin level, bone mineral density loss, and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint is MBL. Fixed/random effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR)/mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome.

Results: Two studies with four trials involving 1,217 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the placebo, when elagolix was used alone or given with additional therapy, the number of participants who satisfied the MBL was greater (MBL <80 mL and MBL was reduced by more than 50% in the last month), improved hemoglobin levels (increased by more than 2 g/dL from baseline to the final treatment month) criteria as well as triggered amenorrhea. Elagolix alone or in combination with add-back therapy improved the quality of life of patients. Compared with the elagolix treatment alone or with add-back therapy, the placebo was superior in terms of less bone mineral density change and a lower incidence of AEs.

Conclusions: This study indicated that elagolix alone or in use with add-back therapy can be considered as a satisfactory treatment plan for the majority of patients who are diagnosed with uterine fibroids and HMB; however, the specific treatment plan should also consider patients' physical condition and any adverse reactions to the drug, based on existing research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信