Evaluating implementation by rural clinics of evidence-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephanie Evett MPH, Shelley Walker  , Grace W. Ryan MPH, PhD, Eliza Steere MPH, Eliza Daly MPH, CHES, Emily A. Janio MPH, Stephanie Pedraza Marin AA, Natoshia M. Askelson MPH, PhD
{"title":"Evaluating implementation by rural clinics of evidence-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination","authors":"Stephanie Evett MPH,&nbsp;Shelley Walker  ,&nbsp;Grace W. Ryan MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Eliza Steere MPH,&nbsp;Eliza Daly MPH, CHES,&nbsp;Emily A. Janio MPH,&nbsp;Stephanie Pedraza Marin AA,&nbsp;Natoshia M. Askelson MPH, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the well-established link between vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and a decreased risk of cancer, HPV vaccine uptake in rural communities is low. Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote HPV vaccination exist but are not universally implemented in rural settings due to various challenges. To understand the support needed by rural clinics in implementing EBIs, the University of Iowa partnered with the American Cancer Society (ACS) to evaluate an ACS HPV Vaccinating Adolescents against Cancers Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative that was delivered to six clinics in two rural health systems. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the learning collaborative approach for helping rural clinics implement EBIs aimed at increasing HPV vaccine uptake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinic staff at six time points throughout the 2-year intervention. Interviews were conducted over the phone and were recorded and transcribed. Members of the research team coded the interviews using codebooks informed by the interview guides. The analysis compared the health systems and identified the changes they made in response to assistance provided by the collaborative.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Clinic staff implemented the following EBIs: utilizing the immunization registry, strong provider recommendation, and provider education. Implementation of scheduling next dose fluctuated during the intervention. Differences were noted in the two health systems’ implementation using electronic health records for patient and provider reminders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Small, rural clinics can implement effective EBIs, given proper support. This is important as such EBIs can increase HPV vaccination rates and help prevent HPV-associated cancers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the well-established link between vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) and a decreased risk of cancer, HPV vaccine uptake in rural communities is low. Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote HPV vaccination exist but are not universally implemented in rural settings due to various challenges. To understand the support needed by rural clinics in implementing EBIs, the University of Iowa partnered with the American Cancer Society (ACS) to evaluate an ACS HPV Vaccinating Adolescents against Cancers Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative that was delivered to six clinics in two rural health systems. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the learning collaborative approach for helping rural clinics implement EBIs aimed at increasing HPV vaccine uptake.

Methods

Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinic staff at six time points throughout the 2-year intervention. Interviews were conducted over the phone and were recorded and transcribed. Members of the research team coded the interviews using codebooks informed by the interview guides. The analysis compared the health systems and identified the changes they made in response to assistance provided by the collaborative.

Results

Clinic staff implemented the following EBIs: utilizing the immunization registry, strong provider recommendation, and provider education. Implementation of scheduling next dose fluctuated during the intervention. Differences were noted in the two health systems’ implementation using electronic health records for patient and provider reminders.

Conclusion

Small, rural clinics can implement effective EBIs, given proper support. This is important as such EBIs can increase HPV vaccination rates and help prevent HPV-associated cancers.

评估农村诊所实施以证据为基础的干预措施以促进HPV疫苗接种
尽管接种人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗与降低癌症风险之间存在明确的联系,但HPV疫苗在农村社区的接种率很低。促进人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的循证干预措施(EBIs)已经存在,但由于各种挑战,在农村地区尚未普遍实施。为了了解农村诊所在实施EBIs时所需要的支持,爱荷华大学与美国癌症协会(ACS)合作,评估了ACS为青少年接种HPV疫苗以预防癌症质量改进学习合作项目,该项目已交付给两个农村卫生系统的六个诊所。该研究旨在评估学习协作方法在帮助农村诊所实施旨在提高HPV疫苗吸收率的ebi方面的有效性。方法采用半结构化访谈法,在2年干预期间的6个时间点对临床工作人员进行访谈。采访是通过电话进行的,并有录音和文字记录。研究小组成员使用由访谈指南提供的代码本对访谈进行编码。该分析比较了卫生系统,并确定了它们为响应合作组织提供的援助而做出的改变。结果临床工作人员实施了以下ebi:利用免疫登记、强有力的提供者推荐和提供者教育。下一剂量计划的实施在干预期间波动。注意到两个卫生系统在使用电子健康记录提醒患者和提供者方面的差异。结论农村小诊所在适当的支持下,可实施有效的ebi。这很重要,因为这样的ebi可以提高HPV疫苗接种率,并有助于预防HPV相关的癌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信