Polymers as Sensing Layers in MEMS Biosensors for Molecular Diagnosis

Q3 Materials Science
Arpana Niranjan, Pallavi Gupta, Manisha Rajoria, I. M. Noor
{"title":"Polymers as Sensing Layers in MEMS Biosensors for Molecular Diagnosis","authors":"Arpana Niranjan,&nbsp;Pallavi Gupta,&nbsp;Manisha Rajoria,&nbsp;I. M. Noor","doi":"10.1002/masy.202400113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polymers have been used significantly in MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) biosensors as substrates, sensor materials, packaging, surface encapsulation, and transducer elements. The sensing layer is a component that interacts with the target molecule. The choice of material for the sensing layer affects the sensitivity of the sensor. This research explores four commonly used polymers (polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), nylon, poly methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and polyethylene) as a sensor layer for bio-recognition in MEMS biosensors. The study is simulation-based. Two models, namely, a simple micro-cantilever beam and piezoelectric cantilever MEMS, are regarded in the paper. Different properties, such as stress and displacements, are studied, as well as voltage, in the case of the piezoelectric model. The comparative study contributes to understanding how different polymer materials and readout methods impact the choice of material for the sensing layer for MEMS biosensors. Results show that for applications using displacement measurement for further analysis, a simple cantilever is more suitable. The PED model has low displacement sensitivity but is an excellent choice when electric output is required. PDMA shows the best results among the materials used for comparative analysis. The final choice of materials depends on the specific application; PDMA provides flexibility and ease of fabrication, whereas PMMA is more suitable for applications requiring rigidity and chemical resistance. PDMA has 1.63 times more voltage sensitivity than PMMA. Furthermore benefits and challenges of using polymer as a sensing layer are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18107,"journal":{"name":"Macromolecular Symposia","volume":"414 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macromolecular Symposia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/masy.202400113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymers have been used significantly in MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) biosensors as substrates, sensor materials, packaging, surface encapsulation, and transducer elements. The sensing layer is a component that interacts with the target molecule. The choice of material for the sensing layer affects the sensitivity of the sensor. This research explores four commonly used polymers (polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), nylon, poly methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and polyethylene) as a sensor layer for bio-recognition in MEMS biosensors. The study is simulation-based. Two models, namely, a simple micro-cantilever beam and piezoelectric cantilever MEMS, are regarded in the paper. Different properties, such as stress and displacements, are studied, as well as voltage, in the case of the piezoelectric model. The comparative study contributes to understanding how different polymer materials and readout methods impact the choice of material for the sensing layer for MEMS biosensors. Results show that for applications using displacement measurement for further analysis, a simple cantilever is more suitable. The PED model has low displacement sensitivity but is an excellent choice when electric output is required. PDMA shows the best results among the materials used for comparative analysis. The final choice of materials depends on the specific application; PDMA provides flexibility and ease of fabrication, whereas PMMA is more suitable for applications requiring rigidity and chemical resistance. PDMA has 1.63 times more voltage sensitivity than PMMA. Furthermore benefits and challenges of using polymer as a sensing layer are also discussed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Macromolecular Symposia
Macromolecular Symposia Materials Science-Polymers and Plastics
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
期刊介绍: Macromolecular Symposia presents state-of-the-art research articles in the field of macromolecular chemistry and physics. All submitted contributions are peer-reviewed to ensure a high quality of published manuscripts. Accepted articles will be typeset and published as a hardcover edition together with online publication at Wiley InterScience, thereby guaranteeing an immediate international dissemination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信