Differentiating between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: A machine learning-based approach

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/bco2.493
Abdolreza Haghpanah, Nazanin Ayareh, Ashkan Akbarzadeh, Dariush Irani, Fatemeh Hosseini, Farid Sabahi Moghadam, Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani, Iman Shamohammadi
{"title":"Differentiating between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: A machine learning-based approach","authors":"Abdolreza Haghpanah,&nbsp;Nazanin Ayareh,&nbsp;Ashkan Akbarzadeh,&nbsp;Dariush Irani,&nbsp;Fatemeh Hosseini,&nbsp;Farid Sabahi Moghadam,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani,&nbsp;Iman Shamohammadi","doi":"10.1002/bco2.493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Infertility is a major global concern, with azoospermia, being the most severe form of male infertility. Distinguishing between obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is crucial due to their differing treatment approaches. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict azoospermia subtypes using clinical, ultrasonographic, semen and hormonal analysis data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included all subjects diagnosed with azoospermia. All patients were evaluated by at least one urologist, had their semen sample assessed on at least two different occasions for diagnosis and underwent a testicular biopsy to determine the type of azoospermia, categorized into OA and NOA. Clinical factors, hormonal levels, semen parameters and testicular features were compared between the OA and NOA groups. Three machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machine and random forest, were evaluated for their accuracy in differentiating the two subtypes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included a total of 427 patients with azoospermia, of which 326 had NOA and 101 had OA. The median age of the patients was 33.0 (IQR: 7.0) years. Our findings revealed that factors such as body mass index, testicular length, volume and longitudinal axis, semen parameters and hormonal levels differed significantly between the two groups. When these variables were input into the machine learning-based models, logistic regression achieved the highest F1-score and area under the curve value among the three models evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study underscores the potential of machine learning to differentiate between azoospermia subtypes using readily available clinical data. However, further research is required to validate and refine the model before it can be applied clinically.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.493","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Infertility is a major global concern, with azoospermia, being the most severe form of male infertility. Distinguishing between obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is crucial due to their differing treatment approaches. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model to predict azoospermia subtypes using clinical, ultrasonographic, semen and hormonal analysis data.

Methods

This retrospective study included all subjects diagnosed with azoospermia. All patients were evaluated by at least one urologist, had their semen sample assessed on at least two different occasions for diagnosis and underwent a testicular biopsy to determine the type of azoospermia, categorized into OA and NOA. Clinical factors, hormonal levels, semen parameters and testicular features were compared between the OA and NOA groups. Three machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machine and random forest, were evaluated for their accuracy in differentiating the two subtypes.

Results

The study included a total of 427 patients with azoospermia, of which 326 had NOA and 101 had OA. The median age of the patients was 33.0 (IQR: 7.0) years. Our findings revealed that factors such as body mass index, testicular length, volume and longitudinal axis, semen parameters and hormonal levels differed significantly between the two groups. When these variables were input into the machine learning-based models, logistic regression achieved the highest F1-score and area under the curve value among the three models evaluated.

Conclusions

This study underscores the potential of machine learning to differentiate between azoospermia subtypes using readily available clinical data. However, further research is required to validate and refine the model before it can be applied clinically.

Abstract Image

区分梗阻性和非梗阻性无精子症:基于机器学习的方法
不育是全球关注的主要问题,无精子症是男性不育最严重的形式。区分阻塞性无精子症(OA)和非阻塞性无精子症(NOA)是至关重要的,因为它们的治疗方法不同。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习模型,利用临床、超声、精液和激素分析数据预测无精子症亚型。方法回顾性研究纳入所有诊断为无精子症的患者。所有患者至少由一名泌尿科医生进行评估,在至少两次不同的情况下评估他们的精液样本以进行诊断,并进行睾丸活检以确定无精子症的类型,分为OA和NOA。比较OA组和NOA组的临床因素、激素水平、精液参数和睾丸特征。三种机器学习模型,包括逻辑回归、支持向量机和随机森林,评估了它们区分两种亚型的准确性。结果共纳入427例无精子症患者,其中NOA 326例,OA 101例。患者的中位年龄为33.0岁(IQR: 7.0)。我们的研究结果显示,两组之间的体重指数、睾丸长度、体积和纵轴、精液参数和激素水平等因素存在显著差异。当这些变量输入到基于机器学习的模型中时,逻辑回归在评估的三种模型中获得了最高的f1得分和曲线下面积值。本研究强调了机器学习在利用现有临床数据区分无精子症亚型方面的潜力。然而,在临床应用之前,需要进一步的研究来验证和完善模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信