Predicting cancer survival at different stages: Insights from fair and explainable machine learning approaches

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Tejasvi Sanjay Kamble , Hongtao Wang , Nicole Myers , Nickolas Littlefield , Leah Reid , Cynthia S. McCarthy , Young Ji Lee , Hongfang Liu , Liron Pantanowitz , Soheyla Amirian , Hooman H. Rashidi , Ahmad P. Tafti
{"title":"Predicting cancer survival at different stages: Insights from fair and explainable machine learning approaches","authors":"Tejasvi Sanjay Kamble ,&nbsp;Hongtao Wang ,&nbsp;Nicole Myers ,&nbsp;Nickolas Littlefield ,&nbsp;Leah Reid ,&nbsp;Cynthia S. McCarthy ,&nbsp;Young Ji Lee ,&nbsp;Hongfang Liu ,&nbsp;Liron Pantanowitz ,&nbsp;Soheyla Amirian ,&nbsp;Hooman H. Rashidi ,&nbsp;Ahmad P. Tafti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>While prior machine learning (ML) models for cancer survivability prediction often treated all cancer stages uniformly, cancer survivability prediction should involve understanding how different stages impact the outcomes. Additionally, the success of ML-powered cancer survival prediction models depends a lot on being fair and easy to understand, especially for different stages of cancer. This study addresses cancer survivability prediction using fair and explainable ML methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Focusing on bladder, breast, and prostate cancers using SEER Program data, we developed and validated fair and explainable ML strategies to train separate models for each stage. These computational strategies also advance the fairness and explainability of the ML models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The current work highlights the important role of ML fairness and explainability in stage-specific cancer survivability prediction, capturing and interpreting the associated factors influencing cancer survivability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This contribution advocates for integrating fairness and explainability in these ML models to ensure equitable, fair, interpretable, and transparent predictions, ultimately enhancing patient care and shared decision-making in cancer treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 105822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

While prior machine learning (ML) models for cancer survivability prediction often treated all cancer stages uniformly, cancer survivability prediction should involve understanding how different stages impact the outcomes. Additionally, the success of ML-powered cancer survival prediction models depends a lot on being fair and easy to understand, especially for different stages of cancer. This study addresses cancer survivability prediction using fair and explainable ML methods.

Methods

Focusing on bladder, breast, and prostate cancers using SEER Program data, we developed and validated fair and explainable ML strategies to train separate models for each stage. These computational strategies also advance the fairness and explainability of the ML models.

Results

The current work highlights the important role of ML fairness and explainability in stage-specific cancer survivability prediction, capturing and interpreting the associated factors influencing cancer survivability.

Conclusions

This contribution advocates for integrating fairness and explainability in these ML models to ensure equitable, fair, interpretable, and transparent predictions, ultimately enhancing patient care and shared decision-making in cancer treatment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信