{"title":"Comparison of Different Sensor Locations on Freezing-of-Gait Ratio Results","authors":"Slavka Netukova , Lucie Horakova , Evžen Růžička , Petr Dusek , Zoltan Szabo , Radim Krupička","doi":"10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Freezing of gait (FoG) is a walking disturbance in the Parkinson's disease (PD). The freezing ratio (FoG-ratio) is a parameter used to quantify overall freezing severity rather than to assess single freezing episodes. Originally the FoG-ratio was designed to be computed from lower limb acceleration. However, some available measurement systems get their data from a single sensor located elsewhere, e.g. on the lower back.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The objective of our paper is to analyse whether acceleration signals measured on different body locations result in a consistent FoG-ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty-four people with PD and 65 people without neurological disorders completed an instrumented Timed Up&Go Test (iTUG) twice. The FoG-ratios from inertial units placed on the chest, lower back, left and right lower limbs were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>There were significant differences between the tested FoG-ratios in the control group as well as in the PD group for both segments. Four significant, but not consistent, correlations were revealed for the turn segment in the PD group. Eight correlations were revealed in the control group. The inter-trial reliability of all the tested cases for gait was good (rho>0.75) but only in one case for turning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, the placement of sensors affected the FoG-ratio parameter output. The different FoG-ratios reflect different amounts of power in the locomotion band of body segments. This could result in inconclusive validity and incomparability of freezing severity presented in studies when the sensor is placed somewhere other than on the lower limbs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14605,"journal":{"name":"Irbm","volume":"46 2","pages":"Article 100881"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irbm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1959031825000065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Freezing of gait (FoG) is a walking disturbance in the Parkinson's disease (PD). The freezing ratio (FoG-ratio) is a parameter used to quantify overall freezing severity rather than to assess single freezing episodes. Originally the FoG-ratio was designed to be computed from lower limb acceleration. However, some available measurement systems get their data from a single sensor located elsewhere, e.g. on the lower back.
Purpose
The objective of our paper is to analyse whether acceleration signals measured on different body locations result in a consistent FoG-ratio.
Methods
Eighty-four people with PD and 65 people without neurological disorders completed an instrumented Timed Up&Go Test (iTUG) twice. The FoG-ratios from inertial units placed on the chest, lower back, left and right lower limbs were calculated.
Findings
There were significant differences between the tested FoG-ratios in the control group as well as in the PD group for both segments. Four significant, but not consistent, correlations were revealed for the turn segment in the PD group. Eight correlations were revealed in the control group. The inter-trial reliability of all the tested cases for gait was good (rho>0.75) but only in one case for turning.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the placement of sensors affected the FoG-ratio parameter output. The different FoG-ratios reflect different amounts of power in the locomotion band of body segments. This could result in inconclusive validity and incomparability of freezing severity presented in studies when the sensor is placed somewhere other than on the lower limbs.
期刊介绍:
IRBM is the journal of the AGBM (Alliance for engineering in Biology an Medicine / Alliance pour le génie biologique et médical) and the SFGBM (BioMedical Engineering French Society / Société française de génie biologique médical) and the AFIB (French Association of Biomedical Engineers / Association française des ingénieurs biomédicaux).
As a vehicle of information and knowledge in the field of biomedical technologies, IRBM is devoted to fundamental as well as clinical research. Biomedical engineering and use of new technologies are the cornerstones of IRBM, providing authors and users with the latest information. Its six issues per year propose reviews (state-of-the-art and current knowledge), original articles directed at fundamental research and articles focusing on biomedical engineering. All articles are submitted to peer reviewers acting as guarantors for IRBM''s scientific and medical content. The field covered by IRBM includes all the discipline of Biomedical engineering. Thereby, the type of papers published include those that cover the technological and methodological development in:
-Physiological and Biological Signal processing (EEG, MEG, ECG…)-
Medical Image processing-
Biomechanics-
Biomaterials-
Medical Physics-
Biophysics-
Physiological and Biological Sensors-
Information technologies in healthcare-
Disability research-
Computational physiology-
…